Analysis of genomic and clinical predictors of overall survival and PSA response: Results from the PRECISION registry.

5051 Background: Outcomes in advanced prostate cancer vary substantially according to clinical and genomic characteristics among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We sought to identify predictors of overall survival (OS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response using data from the PRECISION real-world registry of mCRPC patients treated with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Methods: Patient-level data from five centers (Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, University of British Colombia, University of Washington, Yale University) were aggregated, including demographics, clinical characteristics, genomic alterations, treatments, and clinical outcomes. OS was defined as the time from the first date of PARPi treatment to death or the last date the patient was known to be alive. PSA response was defined as a confirmed ≥50% decline from the PSA level measured closest to the start of PARPi treatment. Ten candidate variables per endpoint were selected via a random forest-based feature selection. Cox models stratified by study were used for OS, and logistic regression models with study included as an additional covariate were used for PSA response. Similarly, non- BRCA mutation status was defined as the presence of any observed mutation in genes other than BRCA , including ATM , CHEK2 , MSH2 , PALB2 , BRIP1 , and BARD1 . Results: The combined dataset included n = 327 patients, with heterogeneity in baseline characteristics and treatments across studies. The prevalence of BRCA ( BRCA1 or BRCA2 ) and non BRCA mutations was 39% and 37% respectively. Median OS for patients with BRCA mutations was 21 months (95% CI:16–28), compared with 15 months (95% CI: 14–18) for those without BRCA mutations. No difference in median OS was observed between patients with and without non- BRCA mutations: 16 months (95%CI: 14-22) and 17 months (15-21), respectively. Cox models identified age, N stage, PSMA–lutetium therapy, PARPi use within a clinical trial, prior taxane treatment (docetaxel or cabazitaxel), and BRCA as important predictors of OS. The corresponding hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals are shown in the table below. Conclusions: These results from real-world data highlight the importance of incorporating genomic information and treatment-specific variables when predicting outcomes in advanced prostate cancer and demonstrate the utility of multi-study integrative analyses. Predictor Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Age 1.02 (1.01–1.04) N stage 1.91 (1.18–3.12) PSMA–lutetium therapy 0.35 (0.20–0.62) PARPi use (within clinical trial) 0.68 (0.48–0.98) Prior taxane treatment (docetaxel or cabazitaxel) 1.44 (1.02–2.02) BRCA mutation 0.50 (0.36–0.69)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5051
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of genomic and clinical predictors of overall survival and PSA response: Results from the PRECISION registry.

Corinne Maurice‐Dror, Hyotae Kim, Kevin Zarrabi, Alexander W. Wyatt et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Analysis of genomic and clinical predictors of overall survival and PSA response: Results from the PRECISION registry.

Corinne Maurice‐Dror, Hyotae Kim, Kevin Zarrabi, Alexander W. Wyatt, Jacob E. Berchuck, A. Tewari, Marc Yorker, Susan Halabi, Christopher McNair, Veda N. Giri, Khaldoun Hamade, Laura Gross, Heather H. Cheng, Rhonda L. Bitting
article en

Abstract

5051 Background: Outcomes in advanced prostate cancer vary substantially according to clinical and genomic characteristics among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We sought to identify predictors of overall survival (OS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response using data from the PRECISION real-world registry of mCRPC patients treated with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Methods: Patient-level data from five centers (Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, University of British Colombia, University of Washington, Yale University) were aggregated, including demographics, clinical characteristics, genomic alterations, treatments, and clinical outcomes. OS was defined as the time from the first date of PARPi treatment to death or the last date the patient was known to be alive. PSA response was defined as a confirmed ≥50% decline from the PSA level measured closest to the start of PARPi treatment. Ten candidate variables per endpoint were selected via a random forest-based feature selection. Cox models stratified by study were used for OS, and logistic regression models with study included as an additional covariate were used for PSA response. Similarly, non- BRCA mutation status was defined as the presence of any observed mutation in genes other than BRCA , including ATM , CHEK2 , MSH2 , PALB2 , BRIP1 , and BARD1 . Results: The combined dataset included n = 327 patients, with heterogeneity in baseline characteristics and treatments across studies. The prevalence of BRCA ( BRCA1 or BRCA2 ) and non BRCA mutations was 39% and 37% respectively. Median OS for patients with BRCA mutations was 21 months (95% CI:16–28), compared with 15 months (95% CI: 14–18) for those without BRCA mutations. No difference in median OS was observed between patients with and without non- BRCA mutations: 16 months (95%CI: 14-22) and 17 months (15-21), respectively. Cox models identified age, N stage, PSMA–lutetium therapy, PARPi use within a clinical trial, prior taxane treatment (docetaxel or cabazitaxel), and BRCA as important predictors of OS. The corresponding hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals are shown in the table below. Conclusions: These results from real-world data highlight the importance of incorporating genomic information and treatment-specific variables when predicting outcomes in advanced prostate cancer and demonstrate the utility of multi-study integrative analyses. Predictor Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Age 1.02 (1.01–1.04) N stage 1.91 (1.18–3.12) PSMA–lutetium therapy 0.35 (0.20–0.62) PARPi use (within clinical trial) 0.68 (0.48–0.98) Prior taxane treatment (docetaxel or cabazitaxel) 1.44 (1.02–2.02) BRCA mutation 0.50 (0.36–0.69)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
BC Cancer Agency (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Emory University (US), Duke University (US), University of Washington (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Prostate Cancer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.