Effect of transanal vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision on 5-year overall survival in patients with rectal cancer: The TaLaR trial.

3631 Background: Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has emerged as a widely adopted surgical approach for rectal cancer. Prior studies have reported favorable short-term outcomes, histopathological quality, and complication profiles for taTME compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (laTME). However, the long-term oncologic effectiveness of taTME remains debated. In our previous work, we demonstrated that 3-year disease-free survival after taTME was noninferior to that after laTME among patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer. Building on these findings, the present study aimed to report the 5-year overall survival (OS) between taTME and laTME. Methods: We conducted a phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial to compare the survival outcomes of taTME versus laTME in patients with rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. This trial encompassed 16 hospitals across 10 provinces in China, with a total enrollment of 1,115 patients. We set the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoints for analysis. This analysis of the 5-year overall survival was conducted following a predefined modified intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02966483. Results: As of June 2025, the overall 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 83.60%, comprising 86.06% in the transanal TME (taTME) group and 81.24% in the laparoscopic TME (laTME) group. The overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 75.90%, with DFS rates of 77.65% in the taTME group and 74.18% in the laTME group. Conclusions: Based on preliminary results from a five-year follow-up, taTME is expected to achieve a five-year overall survival (OS) that is non-inferior to laTME. Our findings will support the routine use of taTME in mid-to-low rectal cancer, particularly in men, obese individuals, and those who have received neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02966483 . 5-year survival results between the laTME group and the taTME group. laTME taTME HR 5-year OS(97.5% CI) 81.24% (77.82%-84.82%) 86.06%(83.04%-89.20%) 0.73 (0.54-1.10) 5-year DFS(95% CI) 74.18%(70.45%-78.10%) 77.65%(74.15%-81.32%) 0.86(0.68-1.11)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.3631
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of transanal vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision on 5-year overall survival in patients with rectal cancer: The TaLaR trial.

Liang Kang, Yue Wang, Ming Xie, Qi Xu et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Effect of transanal vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision on 5-year overall survival in patients with rectal cancer: The TaLaR trial.

Liang Kang, Yue Wang, Ming Xie, Qi Xu, Miao Wu, Y Xiao, MingYang Ren, Yongchun Song, Xu Qingwen, Quan Wang, Shuangling Luo, Hong Zhang, Ziwei Zeng, Huashan Liu, Yi Zhang, Weidong Tong, Jun Ouyang, Dan Ma, Bo Feng
article en

Abstract

3631 Background: Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has emerged as a widely adopted surgical approach for rectal cancer. Prior studies have reported favorable short-term outcomes, histopathological quality, and complication profiles for taTME compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (laTME). However, the long-term oncologic effectiveness of taTME remains debated. In our previous work, we demonstrated that 3-year disease-free survival after taTME was noninferior to that after laTME among patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer. Building on these findings, the present study aimed to report the 5-year overall survival (OS) between taTME and laTME. Methods: We conducted a phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial to compare the survival outcomes of taTME versus laTME in patients with rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. This trial encompassed 16 hospitals across 10 provinces in China, with a total enrollment of 1,115 patients. We set the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoints for analysis. This analysis of the 5-year overall survival was conducted following a predefined modified intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02966483. Results: As of June 2025, the overall 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 83.60%, comprising 86.06% in the transanal TME (taTME) group and 81.24% in the laparoscopic TME (laTME) group. The overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 75.90%, with DFS rates of 77.65% in the taTME group and 74.18% in the laTME group. Conclusions: Based on preliminary results from a five-year follow-up, taTME is expected to achieve a five-year overall survival (OS) that is non-inferior to laTME. Our findings will support the routine use of taTME in mid-to-low rectal cancer, particularly in men, obese individuals, and those who have received neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02966483 . 5-year survival results between the laTME group and the taTME group. laTME taTME HR 5-year OS(97.5% CI) 81.24% (77.82%-84.82%) 86.06%(83.04%-89.20%) 0.73 (0.54-1.10) 5-year DFS(95% CI) 74.18%(70.45%-78.10%) 77.65%(74.15%-81.32%) 0.86(0.68-1.11)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
North Sichuan Medical University (CN), Central South University (CN), Army Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Guangdong Medical College (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Jilin University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Renji Hospital (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Daping Hospital (CN), Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Nanfang Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (CN), Xinqiao Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), First Hospital of Jilin University (CN), First Hospital of China Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China (CN), Second People’s Hospital of Yibin (CN), Third Xiangya Hospital (CN), Nanchong Central Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College (CN), Southern Medical University (CN), China Medical University (CN), University of South China (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.