The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer incidence and cancer-specific mortality.

10589 Background: The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on cancer screening rates and cancer-related outcomes. The purpose of our study was to determine how the pandemic has affected cancer incidence, incidence by Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) stage, and cancer-specific mortality for the most common cancers in incidence and cancer-specific mortality. Methods: The data for our population-based cohort study was accessed by permission from the SEER dataset. We aggregated data for incidence and cancer-specific mortality regarding the leading ten cancers in incidence and cancer-specific mortality, plus cervical cancer, between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022 and further divided this time period into two 36-month pre-pandemic and post-pandemic groups. Demographic variables were collected for stratified analyses. Poisson regression models were used to estimate incidence and mortality rates for each cancer type, incorporating the natural logarithm of the total population as an offset term to account for differences in population size. Results: Nine of eleven cancers showed significantly higher IRRs (incidence rate ratios) for distant SEER stages during the 36-month post-pandemic period. Most importantly, several cancers with established screening modalities had significantly increased IRRs for distant SEER stage of disease including prostate cancer (IRR 1.175, 95% CI: 1.155-1.195, p<0.001), breast cancer (IRR 1.060, 95% CI: 1.040-1.080, p<0.001), and colorectal cancer (IRR 1.034, 95% CI: 1.020-1.048, p<0.001). Cancer-specific mortality showed significantly increased post-pandemic mortality rate ratios (MRRs) for pancreatic cancer (MRR 1.049, 95% CI: 1.041-1.056, p<0.001), prostate cancer (MRR 1.042, 95% CI: 1.032-1.051, p<0.001), and liver cancer (MRR 1.026, 95% CI: 1.016-1.036, p<0.001). Lung cancer (MRR 0.931, 95% CI: 0.927-0.935, p<0.001), Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (MRR 0.972, 95% CI: 0.961-0.983, p<0.001) and breast cancer (MRR 0.989, 95% CI: 0.981-0.996, p=0.004) all had significantly lower cancer-specific mortality in our post-pandemic period. Conclusions: In this large population-based cohort, we observed a shift towards more distant SEER stage cancer diagnoses in the post–pandemic period. The increase in advanced-stage diseases reflects a higher burden of disease and is particularly concerning for cancers with proven screening benefit. These findings suggest persistent downstream effects of disruptions in routine healthcare and cancer screening which have added to the public health crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.10589
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer incidence and cancer-specific mortality.

Stephanie Mackenzie, Richard A. Shellenberger, Remonda Khalil-Moawad, MacKenzie Mayo et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer incidence and cancer-specific mortality.

Stephanie Mackenzie, Richard A. Shellenberger, Remonda Khalil-Moawad, MacKenzie Mayo, Charles Tobin, Reba Dhillon, Eli Tidwell
article en

Abstract

10589 Background: The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on cancer screening rates and cancer-related outcomes. The purpose of our study was to determine how the pandemic has affected cancer incidence, incidence by Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) stage, and cancer-specific mortality for the most common cancers in incidence and cancer-specific mortality. Methods: The data for our population-based cohort study was accessed by permission from the SEER dataset. We aggregated data for incidence and cancer-specific mortality regarding the leading ten cancers in incidence and cancer-specific mortality, plus cervical cancer, between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022 and further divided this time period into two 36-month pre-pandemic and post-pandemic groups. Demographic variables were collected for stratified analyses. Poisson regression models were used to estimate incidence and mortality rates for each cancer type, incorporating the natural logarithm of the total population as an offset term to account for differences in population size. Results: Nine of eleven cancers showed significantly higher IRRs (incidence rate ratios) for distant SEER stages during the 36-month post-pandemic period. Most importantly, several cancers with established screening modalities had significantly increased IRRs for distant SEER stage of disease including prostate cancer (IRR 1.175, 95% CI: 1.155-1.195, p<0.001), breast cancer (IRR 1.060, 95% CI: 1.040-1.080, p<0.001), and colorectal cancer (IRR 1.034, 95% CI: 1.020-1.048, p<0.001). Cancer-specific mortality showed significantly increased post-pandemic mortality rate ratios (MRRs) for pancreatic cancer (MRR 1.049, 95% CI: 1.041-1.056, p<0.001), prostate cancer (MRR 1.042, 95% CI: 1.032-1.051, p<0.001), and liver cancer (MRR 1.026, 95% CI: 1.016-1.036, p<0.001). Lung cancer (MRR 0.931, 95% CI: 0.927-0.935, p<0.001), Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (MRR 0.972, 95% CI: 0.961-0.983, p<0.001) and breast cancer (MRR 0.989, 95% CI: 0.981-0.996, p=0.004) all had significantly lower cancer-specific mortality in our post-pandemic period. Conclusions: In this large population-based cohort, we observed a shift towards more distant SEER stage cancer diagnoses in the post–pandemic period. The increase in advanced-stage diseases reflects a higher burden of disease and is particularly concerning for cancers with proven screening benefit. These findings suggest persistent downstream effects of disruptions in routine healthcare and cancer screening which have added to the public health crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Trinity Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.