Machine learning–based prognostic models for mortality prediction after unplanned hospitalization in cancer patients.

11122 Background: Unplanned hospitalizations in oncology patients often indicate acute clinical deterioration and are associated with high mortality. Prognostic assessment at admission remains a challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. Machine learning (ML) methods can integrate clinical and laboratory features to generate individualized mortality predictions, although the data is scarce. We aimed to develop and validate ML-based models to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day all-cause mortality in adult cancer patients with unplanned hospitalizations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with cancer who were admitted for unplanned hospitalizations at Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital between January 2018 and August 2024. Class imbalance was addressed using SMOTE, and ANOVA-based feature selection retained the top 20 predictors. Nine ML algorithms were tested, including SVM, kNN, decision trees, neural networks, and ensemble models. Model performance was assessed via 5-fold cross-validation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. Results: A total of 1646 cancer patients with unplanned hospitalizations were included. The most common cancers were gastrointestinal malignancies (32.8%), lung cancer (17.4%), and breast cancer (9.8%). For in-hospital mortality prediction, Random Forest achieved the best performance on the original dataset (AUC-ROC: 0.89; accuracy: 84.6%). After SMOTE, SVM yielded the superior results (AUC-ROC: 0.98; accuracy: 93.6%). For 30-day mortality prediction, Random Forest was optimal pre-SMOTE (AUC-ROC:0.85; accuracy:83.6%), whereas LightGBM reached the highest post-SMOTE performance (AUC-ROC:0.97; accuracy:91.8). For 90-day mortality prediction, XGBoost demonstrated the best performance on the original dataset (AUC-ROC: 0.84; accuracy: 80.4%). Following the application of SMOTE, LightGBM outperformed the other models (AUC-ROC:0.90; accuracy:82.3%). Conclusions: This first study focusing on predicting in-hospital mortality in cancer patients with unplanned admissions shows that ML models based on routine admission data can reliably predict early- and long-term mortality. Incorporating such models into workflows may support early risk stratification, shared decision-making, and individualized care planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.11122
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning–based prognostic models for mortality prediction after unplanned hospitalization in cancer patients.

Neyran Kertmen, Zafer Arık, Alev Türker, Hilal Arslan et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Machine learning–based prognostic models for mortality prediction after unplanned hospitalization in cancer patients.

Neyran Kertmen, Zafer Arık, Alev Türker, Hilal Arslan, Naciye Güdük, Nur Evşan Boyraz, Mustafa Berkay TAŞTEKİN, Emrach Chousein, Taha Koray Sahin, Erencan Yakut, Firat Sirvan, Deniz Can Guven, Ayse Belemir Esen
article en

Abstract

11122 Background: Unplanned hospitalizations in oncology patients often indicate acute clinical deterioration and are associated with high mortality. Prognostic assessment at admission remains a challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. Machine learning (ML) methods can integrate clinical and laboratory features to generate individualized mortality predictions, although the data is scarce. We aimed to develop and validate ML-based models to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day all-cause mortality in adult cancer patients with unplanned hospitalizations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with cancer who were admitted for unplanned hospitalizations at Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital between January 2018 and August 2024. Class imbalance was addressed using SMOTE, and ANOVA-based feature selection retained the top 20 predictors. Nine ML algorithms were tested, including SVM, kNN, decision trees, neural networks, and ensemble models. Model performance was assessed via 5-fold cross-validation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. Results: A total of 1646 cancer patients with unplanned hospitalizations were included. The most common cancers were gastrointestinal malignancies (32.8%), lung cancer (17.4%), and breast cancer (9.8%). For in-hospital mortality prediction, Random Forest achieved the best performance on the original dataset (AUC-ROC: 0.89; accuracy: 84.6%). After SMOTE, SVM yielded the superior results (AUC-ROC: 0.98; accuracy: 93.6%). For 30-day mortality prediction, Random Forest was optimal pre-SMOTE (AUC-ROC:0.85; accuracy:83.6%), whereas LightGBM reached the highest post-SMOTE performance (AUC-ROC:0.97; accuracy:91.8). For 90-day mortality prediction, XGBoost demonstrated the best performance on the original dataset (AUC-ROC: 0.84; accuracy: 80.4%). Following the application of SMOTE, LightGBM outperformed the other models (AUC-ROC:0.90; accuracy:82.3%). Conclusions: This first study focusing on predicting in-hospital mortality in cancer patients with unplanned admissions shows that ML models based on routine admission data can reliably predict early- and long-term mortality. Incorporating such models into workflows may support early risk stratification, shared decision-making, and individualized care planning.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Hacettepe University Hospital (TR), Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.