The interference effect of direct eye gaze in the Stroop paradigm

Direct eye gaze is a salient social stimulus that may hinder concurrent task performance, even when presented with another prominent distracter, such as the incongruent word in the Stroop paradigm. Previous studies (Chevallier et al., 2013;Conty et al., 2010) reported a stronger Stroop effect when direct gaze (vs. closed eyes) was shown above the letter strings, though not all studies found this effect. We had two main goals. The first was to replicate the increased Stroop effect under direct eye gaze. The second was to test whether this effect is specific to another person's eyes (ostensive nature explanation) or also occurs for one's own eyes (salience explanation). In two experiments (one with a trial-based and one with a block-based manipulation), participants performed the Stroop task while presented with either their own or another person's direct gaze versus closed eyes. We found no increased Stroop effect under direct eye gaze compared to closed eyes, irrespective of whether one's own eyes or another person's eyes were presented. We conducted a third experiment to directly replicate the original findings byConty et al. (2010)andChevallier et al. (2013), including only another person's eyes. Again, no increase in the Stroop effect under direct eye gaze was found. A pooled analysis across the three experiments provided strong evidence for the null hypothesis. Taken together, we could not replicate previous findings of direct eye gaze increasing the Stroop effect. Our findings underline the central importance of replication studies and negative findings in experimental psychology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106981
Primary Topic
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interference effect of direct eye gaze in the Stroop paradigm

Danna Oomen, Letizia Amodeo, Marcel Braß, Annabel D. Nijhof et al.
Acta Psychologica
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
article

The interference effect of direct eye gaze in the Stroop paradigm

Danna Oomen, Letizia Amodeo, Marcel Braß, Annabel D. Nijhof, Jan R. Wiersema
article en

Abstract

Direct eye gaze is a salient social stimulus that may hinder concurrent task performance, even when presented with another prominent distracter, such as the incongruent word in the Stroop paradigm. Previous studies (Chevallier et al., 2013;Conty et al., 2010) reported a stronger Stroop effect when direct gaze (vs. closed eyes) was shown above the letter strings, though not all studies found this effect. We had two main goals. The first was to replicate the increased Stroop effect under direct eye gaze. The second was to test whether this effect is specific to another person's eyes (ostensive nature explanation) or also occurs for one's own eyes (salience explanation). In two experiments (one with a trial-based and one with a block-based manipulation), participants performed the Stroop task while presented with either their own or another person's direct gaze versus closed eyes. We found no increased Stroop effect under direct eye gaze compared to closed eyes, irrespective of whether one's own eyes or another person's eyes were presented. We conducted a third experiment to directly replicate the original findings byConty et al. (2010)andChevallier et al. (2013), including only another person's eyes. Again, no increase in the Stroop effect under direct eye gaze was found. A pooled analysis across the three experiments provided strong evidence for the null hypothesis. Taken together, we could not replicate previous findings of direct eye gaze increasing the Stroop effect. Our findings underline the central importance of replication studies and negative findings in experimental psychology.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 267
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), Ghent University (BE)
Universiteit Gent
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.