The Auditory-Visual Stroop Test to Assess Subjects with Tinnitus

Background/Objectives: In this three-stage study, we aimed to adapt an Auditory-Visual Stroop test (AV-Stroop test) for tinnitus subjects, evaluate the correlation between performance in the conventional Stroop test (C-Stroop test) and the AV-Stroop test; assess the effect of cognitive screening test performance on the AV-Stroop test’s results; and apply the AV-Stroop test in participants with tinnitus and controls. Methods: At the First Stage, the AV-Stroop test was adapted using white noise (WN), pure tone (PT), and narrow band (NB) sound stimuli. At the Second Stage, results of the AV-Stroop test, the C-Stroop test, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) were compared (n = 45). At the Third Stage, the AV-Stroop test was applied to participants with and without tinnitus (n = 70). The tinnitus group was assessed with an additional test track (stimuli matched to tinnitus spectral characteristics, Tinnitus Pitch). Results: We adapted 34 training and evaluation tracks for the AV-Stroop test. AV-Stroop test’s results were correlated with C-Stroop test’s total task time (WN, p-value = 0.002; NB and PT, p-value < 0.001 comparing C-Stroop word reading task; and WN, NB, and PT, p-value < 0.001 for C-Stroop color naming task), and number of errors (NB, p-value < 0.001 comparing C-Stroop word reading task, and p-value = 0.012 for C-Stroop color naming task). Participants’ MOCA scores were not associated with AV-Stroop test performance. Participants with tinnitus required more time and made more errors in the AV-Stroop test. Additionally, the tinnitus group made more errors in the Tinnitus Pitch track. Conclusions: The AV-Stroop test proved to be an accessible, easy-to-administer tool for evaluating attentional and inhibitory control in participants with tinnitus. The stimulus with spectral characteristics similar to tinnitus perception was more effective in assessing top-down executive control in participants with the symptom.