Evaluating the appropriateness of prescribing antibiotics among persons with HIV (PWH) in an Urban HIV outpatient clinic in Uganda

BACKGROUND: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces a high burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Inappropriate antibiotic use is the major driver of AMR. Populations at high risk for infections, such as persons living with HIV (PWH), are more likely to experience AMR. However, data on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in outpatient settings for PWH are limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of antibiotic prescriptions from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2022 in an HIV tertiary care outpatient clinic in Uganda. We extracted data from patients' records and assessed appropriateness using a customized tool. Data were abstracted across three points of care: the general clinic, the urgent care unit, and the TB clinic for presumptive TB patients. Prescriptions were considered appropriate if they had a documented indication, the right drug, dose, frequency, and duration, when evaluated against national guidelines and the national formulary in some instances. Appropriateness was measured in proportions, and differences in patient characteristics were analyzed. Factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions were assessed using a modified Poisson regression model. RESULTS: We reviewed the medical records of 1367 participants, with a median age of 49 years (IQR: 42-57), and the majority, 944 (69.1%), were female. In total, the participants contributed 1823 antibiotic prescriptions, of which 1605 (88%) were inappropriate. Of the 1605 inappropriate prescriptions, 842 (52.5%) were due to absence of an indication, 539 (33.5%) to nonadherence to the guidelines, and 224 (14%) didn't have a suspected or confirmed infection. The urgent care unit had the highest proportion of inappropriate antibiotic use (82.4%), p = 0.02. Fluoroquinolones 14/124 (11.3%), macrolides 22/189 (11.6%), and cephalosporins 56/479 (11.7%) were the least appropriately prescribed classes of antibiotics. The male participants had a 17% lower prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions compared to females [adjusted PR 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.92)]. CONCLUSION: We found a high level of inappropriate antibiotic use among PWH in outpatient care. Notably, more than half of the prescriptions lacked a documented indication, highlighting poor documentation practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-026-01760-5
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the appropriateness of prescribing antibiotics among persons with HIV (PWH) in an Urban HIV outpatient clinic in Uganda

Herman Mwanja, Joseph Musaazi, Francis Kakooza, Grace Banturaki et al.
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Evaluating the appropriateness of prescribing antibiotics among persons with HIV (PWH) in an Urban HIV outpatient clinic in Uganda

Herman Mwanja, Joseph Musaazi, Francis Kakooza, Grace Banturaki, Brian Otaalo, A Kambugu, Eva Agnes Laker Odongpiny, Derek Ngabirano, Mackline Hope, Barbara Castelnuovo, Reuben Kiggundu, Noela C. Owarwo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces a high burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Inappropriate antibiotic use is the major driver of AMR. Populations at high risk for infections, such as persons living with HIV (PWH), are more likely to experience AMR. However, data on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in outpatient settings for PWH are limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of antibiotic prescriptions from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2022 in an HIV tertiary care outpatient clinic in Uganda. We extracted data from patients' records and assessed appropriateness using a customized tool. Data were abstracted across three points of care: the general clinic, the urgent care unit, and the TB clinic for presumptive TB patients. Prescriptions were considered appropriate if they had a documented indication, the right drug, dose, frequency, and duration, when evaluated against national guidelines and the national formulary in some instances. Appropriateness was measured in proportions, and differences in patient characteristics were analyzed. Factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions were assessed using a modified Poisson regression model. RESULTS: We reviewed the medical records of 1367 participants, with a median age of 49 years (IQR: 42-57), and the majority, 944 (69.1%), were female. In total, the participants contributed 1823 antibiotic prescriptions, of which 1605 (88%) were inappropriate. Of the 1605 inappropriate prescriptions, 842 (52.5%) were due to absence of an indication, 539 (33.5%) to nonadherence to the guidelines, and 224 (14%) didn't have a suspected or confirmed infection. The urgent care unit had the highest proportion of inappropriate antibiotic use (82.4%), p = 0.02. Fluoroquinolones 14/124 (11.3%), macrolides 22/189 (11.6%), and cephalosporins 56/479 (11.7%) were the least appropriately prescribed classes of antibiotics. The male participants had a 17% lower prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions compared to females [adjusted PR 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.92)]. CONCLUSION: We found a high level of inappropriate antibiotic use among PWH in outpatient care. Notably, more than half of the prescriptions lacked a documented indication, highlighting poor documentation practices.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
University of St Andrews (GB), Infectious Diseases Institute (UG), Makerere University (UG)
Wellcome Trust
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.