Correlates of patient enrollment in a population-based randomized controlled trial of cascade genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer susceptibility.

10528 Background: Clinical trials that enroll patients through virtual approaches are growing but there is little information about the impact on access. The Genetic Information and Family Testing (GIFT) study was a population-based cluster RCT that evaluated an online platform that delivered cancer genetic education and home germline testing to families with hereditary cancer susceptibility. We examined correlates of patient enrollment to address potential barriers to trial access. Methods: We identified a random sample of adult patients with any cancer type diagnosed in Georgia or California in 2018-19 who linked to a pathogenic variant (PV) in a cancer susceptibility gene through a SEER-based data infrastructure. We initiated a mailed survey four years after diagnosis. We invited all respondents who recalled a PV on testing to enroll online in GIFT. Enrolled patients could invite their first- and second-degree relatives to enroll through the online platform. The primary endpoint was the proportion of relatives who received testing through the platform. We examined clinical and sociodemographic correlates of patient enrollment. Results: 4,300 patients were selected and 2,285 completed the survey (53.1%); 2,006 of 2,285 respondents were eligible and invited to GIFT (87.8) and 412 enrolled (20.5). The Table shows clinical and sociodemographic correlates of patient enrollment for the 1,994 with complete data. There were no substantial differences in enrollment by PV grouping, cancer type, sex, or race/ethnic groups. Enrollment was lower in older patients, those with lower education levels, and those living in census tracts with higher poverty levels. Conclusions: GIFT successfully enrolled a diverse patient population through a virtual approach. Moderate sociodemographic gradients observed in GIFT motivate strategies to ensure access to clinical trials that use virtual approaches to patient enrollment. Trial Registration: NCT05552664 at clinicaltrials.gov. Patients Enrolled n % p Gene Type with PV 0.601 BRCA1/2 or other breast cancer-related 1,650 22 Lynch Syndrome or other gastrointestinal (GI)-related 225 23 Cancer type 0.702 GI 145 20 Ovary/uterine 86 23 Female breast 1,234 22 Prostate 72 24 Other 407 19 Sex 0.594 Male 222 20 Female 1,722 22 Age <.001 <45 501 27 45-64 1,025 22 65+ 414 15

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.10528
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlates of patient enrollment in a population-based randomized controlled trial of cascade genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer susceptibility.

Jennifer Lee Caswell-Jin, SJ Katz, Christine M. Veenstra, Allison W. Kurian et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Correlates of patient enrollment in a population-based randomized controlled trial of cascade genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer susceptibility.

Jennifer Lee Caswell-Jin, SJ Katz, Christine M. Veenstra, Allison W. Kurian, Lawrence C. An, Paul Abrahamse
article en

Abstract

10528 Background: Clinical trials that enroll patients through virtual approaches are growing but there is little information about the impact on access. The Genetic Information and Family Testing (GIFT) study was a population-based cluster RCT that evaluated an online platform that delivered cancer genetic education and home germline testing to families with hereditary cancer susceptibility. We examined correlates of patient enrollment to address potential barriers to trial access. Methods: We identified a random sample of adult patients with any cancer type diagnosed in Georgia or California in 2018-19 who linked to a pathogenic variant (PV) in a cancer susceptibility gene through a SEER-based data infrastructure. We initiated a mailed survey four years after diagnosis. We invited all respondents who recalled a PV on testing to enroll online in GIFT. Enrolled patients could invite their first- and second-degree relatives to enroll through the online platform. The primary endpoint was the proportion of relatives who received testing through the platform. We examined clinical and sociodemographic correlates of patient enrollment. Results: 4,300 patients were selected and 2,285 completed the survey (53.1%); 2,006 of 2,285 respondents were eligible and invited to GIFT (87.8) and 412 enrolled (20.5). The Table shows clinical and sociodemographic correlates of patient enrollment for the 1,994 with complete data. There were no substantial differences in enrollment by PV grouping, cancer type, sex, or race/ethnic groups. Enrollment was lower in older patients, those with lower education levels, and those living in census tracts with higher poverty levels. Conclusions: GIFT successfully enrolled a diverse patient population through a virtual approach. Moderate sociodemographic gradients observed in GIFT motivate strategies to ensure access to clinical trials that use virtual approaches to patient enrollment. Trial Registration: NCT05552664 at clinicaltrials.gov. Patients Enrolled n % p Gene Type with PV 0.601 BRCA1/2 or other breast cancer-related 1,650 22 Lynch Syndrome or other gastrointestinal (GI)-related 225 23 Cancer type 0.702 GI 145 20 Ovary/uterine 86 23 Female breast 1,234 22 Prostate 72 24 Other 407 19 Sex 0.594 Male 222 20 Female 1,722 22 Age <.001 <45 501 27 45-64 1,025 22 65+ 414 15

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US), University of Michigan (US), Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University (US)
American Cancer Society, National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.