Determining Barriers to Submitting Antimicrobial-Resistant Isolates to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network): A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network) was developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to detect and prevent antimicrobial-resistant threats. However, low submission rates of antimicrobial-resistant isolates limit the AR Lab Network’s ability to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study expands on a study conducted in Texas Public Health Region 8 (PHR8). Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate submission barriers for antimicrobial-resistant isolates in Texas acute care hospitals (ACH) and critical access hospitals (CAH). Methods: A survey was designed and emailed to laboratory professionals to identify barriers to antimicrobial-resistant isolate submission. Responses were analyzed using two-sided Fisher’s exact tests to identify associations between responses and respondent characteristics. Results: Of the Texas laboratory personnel invited to participate, 123 responses from 211 hospitals were received, for a response rate of 58.29%. Lack of awareness of the AR Lab Network was the most frequently cited submission barrier (50.48% of respondents). Other submission barriers included submission to another laboratory (49.53%), lack of staff time (42.86%), lack of training or certified personnel (41.9%), and a submission process that was too time-consuming (40%). Discussion: As in the Texas PHR8 study, it was found that, regardless of the respondent’s role, time in that role, or the type of hospital in which they worked, the most common barrier to antimicrobial-resistant isolate submission was lack of awareness of the AR Lab Network. In the future, the identified barriers will be addressed by implementing educational outreach programs about the AR Lab Network for Texas hospitals and healthcare facilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109758
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining Barriers to Submitting Antimicrobial-Resistant Isolates to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network): A Cross-Sectional Study

Rachel Pittman, Rebecca L. Sanchez, Ryan Nguyen
Cureus
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Determining Barriers to Submitting Antimicrobial-Resistant Isolates to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network): A Cross-Sectional Study

Rachel Pittman, Rebecca L. Sanchez, Ryan Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Background: The Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network) was developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to detect and prevent antimicrobial-resistant threats. However, low submission rates of antimicrobial-resistant isolates limit the AR Lab Network’s ability to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study expands on a study conducted in Texas Public Health Region 8 (PHR8). Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate submission barriers for antimicrobial-resistant isolates in Texas acute care hospitals (ACH) and critical access hospitals (CAH). Methods: A survey was designed and emailed to laboratory professionals to identify barriers to antimicrobial-resistant isolate submission. Responses were analyzed using two-sided Fisher’s exact tests to identify associations between responses and respondent characteristics. Results: Of the Texas laboratory personnel invited to participate, 123 responses from 211 hospitals were received, for a response rate of 58.29%. Lack of awareness of the AR Lab Network was the most frequently cited submission barrier (50.48% of respondents). Other submission barriers included submission to another laboratory (49.53%), lack of staff time (42.86%), lack of training or certified personnel (41.9%), and a submission process that was too time-consuming (40%). Discussion: As in the Texas PHR8 study, it was found that, regardless of the respondent’s role, time in that role, or the type of hospital in which they worked, the most common barrier to antimicrobial-resistant isolate submission was lack of awareness of the AR Lab Network. In the future, the identified barriers will be addressed by implementing educational outreach programs about the AR Lab Network for Texas hospitals and healthcare facilities.

Cureus
University of the Incarnate Word (US)
U.S. Department of State, Texas Department of State Health Services
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.