Antiemetic Efficacy of Aprepitant in Cisplatin–Gemcitabine Therapy for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Study

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a significant issue among the adverse events associated with chemotherapy, and the management of nausea remains inadequate. Although international guidelines classify gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) therapy as having a high emetogenic risk, Japanese guidelines categorize it as moderate risk. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of aprepitant as a prophylactic antiemetic in conjunction with GC therapy for biliary tract cancer in a real-world setting. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> This retrospective study was conducted at 12 hospitals in Japan. Patients who received their first cycle of GC therapy between January 2012 and June 2023 were included. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust for differences in the baseline patient characteristics. The primary endpoint was the total control (TC) rate in the delayed phase, which was defined as 24-120 h post chemotherapy. <h3>Results:</h3> After propensity-score matching, 129 patients were included in each group. The TC rates in the delayed phase and overall (0-168 h) were significantly higher in the aprepitant group than in the non-aprepitant group (90.7% <i>vs</i>. 71.3%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001 and 88.4% <i>vs</i>. 65.9%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001, respectively). The rates of nausea and vomiting of any grade were significantly lower in the aprepitant group than in the non-aprepitant group (11.6% <i>vs</i>. 33.3%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.01 and 0% <i>vs</i>. 7.0%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.01, respectively). <h3>Conclusion:</h3> The addition of aprepitant significantly improves the delayed-phase TC rate by approximately 20%. These findings suggest the significance of aprepitant in the management of CINV during GC therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anticancer Research
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18207
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antiemetic Efficacy of Aprepitant in Cisplatin–Gemcitabine Therapy for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Study

Hiroyuki Nagashima, Akihide Ota, Daisuke Hirate, Takako Obara et al.
Anticancer Research
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Antiemetic Efficacy of Aprepitant in Cisplatin–Gemcitabine Therapy for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Study

Hiroyuki Nagashima, Akihide Ota, Daisuke Hirate, Takako Obara, Shuichi TAKASAKI, Kengo Umehara, Ayuko Kusakabe, Taiki Watanabe, Koshi Fujikawa, Aya Kooka, Hiroyuki Kawaguchi, Tamotsu Sagawa, A. Shimizu, TOMOAKI HATAKEYAMA, Shinya Takada, YOSHITAKA SAITO, TAKASHI SHIMOGUCHIYA, RYO FUJIBAYASHI, KENTA MAEDA, YUKI HASEGAWA
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a significant issue among the adverse events associated with chemotherapy, and the management of nausea remains inadequate. Although international guidelines classify gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) therapy as having a high emetogenic risk, Japanese guidelines categorize it as moderate risk. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of aprepitant as a prophylactic antiemetic in conjunction with GC therapy for biliary tract cancer in a real-world setting. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> This retrospective study was conducted at 12 hospitals in Japan. Patients who received their first cycle of GC therapy between January 2012 and June 2023 were included. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust for differences in the baseline patient characteristics. The primary endpoint was the total control (TC) rate in the delayed phase, which was defined as 24-120 h post chemotherapy. <h3>Results:</h3> After propensity-score matching, 129 patients were included in each group. The TC rates in the delayed phase and overall (0-168 h) were significantly higher in the aprepitant group than in the non-aprepitant group (90.7% <i>vs</i>. 71.3%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001 and 88.4% <i>vs</i>. 65.9%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001, respectively). The rates of nausea and vomiting of any grade were significantly lower in the aprepitant group than in the non-aprepitant group (11.6% <i>vs</i>. 33.3%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.01 and 0% <i>vs</i>. 7.0%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.01, respectively). <h3>Conclusion:</h3> The addition of aprepitant significantly improves the delayed-phase TC rate by approximately 20%. These findings suggest the significance of aprepitant in the management of CINV during GC therapy.

Anticancer ResearchVol. 46(6)
Hokkaido University of Science (JP), Sapporo Medical University (JP), Hokkaido Pharmaceutical University (JP), NTT Medical Center (JP), Alpha Technologies (Canada) (CA), Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital (JP), Otaru Municipal Hospital (JP), Kin-ikyo Chuo Hospital (JP), National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center (JP), Tonan Hospital (JP), Hokkaido hospital (JP), Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital (JP), Hokushin General Hospital (JP), Teine Keijinkai Hospital (JP), Sapporo City General Hospital (JP), Toujinkai Hospital (JP), Japan Cancer Society (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.