Pre-transplant MRD negativity and TP53 mutation status determine survival after CAR-T therapy bridged to allo-HSCT for refractory/relapse B-ALL.

6556 Background: The feasibility and outcomes of bridging relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) following CAR-T therapy require further investigation. This study evaluated long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in this setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 300 consecutive R/R B-lineage leukemia patients (295 B-ALL, 98.3%) who underwent allo-HSCT after CAR-T therapy. Somatic mutation screening via next-generation sequencing was performed on 179 patients. Univariate Cox regression analyzed factors associated with transplant outcomes. A contemporaneous cohort of 36 transplanted patients without prior CAR-T served as a comparator. Results: Median age at transplant was 14 years (range, 1-68). Prior to HSCT, 220 (73.3%), 75 (25.0%), and 5 (1.7%) patients received CD19-, CD22-, and Mix-CAR-T, respectively; 265 (88.3%) achieved complete remission (CR), and 39 (13.0%) were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for the CAR-T bridging cohort were 64.0% (95%CI, 58.6-69.8%), 74.5% (95%CI, 69.5-79.9%), 28.4% (95%CI, 23.6-34.1%), and 7.6% (95%CI, 5.04-11.3%), respectively. Outcomes did not differ significantly from the non-CAR-T cohort (OS, p=0.54; DFS, p=0.24). Failure to achieve CR pre-HSCT (HR=3.31, p<0.0001) and MRD-positivity (HR=3.69, p<0.0001) were risk factors for relapse, while chronic graft-versus-host disease was protective (HR=0.35, p=0.0002). Pre-HSCT MRD-positivity, fungal infection, and viral cystitis increased NRM risk. TP53 (15.1%), KMT2D (14.5%), NRAS (14.0%), KRAS (13.4%), and ABL1 (9.5%) were the most frequently mutated genes. TP53 mutation was a significant risk factor for inferior DFS (HR=3.37, p<0.0001) and OS (HR=3.56, p<0.0001). GNAS and KDM6A mutations predicted higher CIR, while ETV6 mutation was associated with increased NRM. Conclusions: Bridging to allo-HSCT after CAR-T therapy is a feasible and effective strategy for R/R B-ALL, providing substantial long-term survival. Achieving pre-transplant CR and MRD-negative status is critical for outcome. Somatic mutations, particularly TP53, hold significant prognostic value, aiding in risk stratification and treatment optimization for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.6556
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-transplant MRD negativity and TP53 mutation status determine survival after CAR-T therapy bridged to allo-HSCT for refractory/relapse B-ALL.

Tong Wu, Xiaopei Wen, Jing Li, Qinlong Zheng et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Pre-transplant MRD negativity and TP53 mutation status determine survival after CAR-T therapy bridged to allo-HSCT for refractory/relapse B-ALL.

Tong Wu, Xiaopei Wen, Jing Li, Qinlong Zheng, Jiahong Zhai, Zongyang Ming, Xianxuan Wang, Qian Fei, Keyan Yang, Yanzhi Song, Yongqiang Zhao, Zhihui Li, Lei Wang
article en

Abstract

6556 Background: The feasibility and outcomes of bridging relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) following CAR-T therapy require further investigation. This study evaluated long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in this setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 300 consecutive R/R B-lineage leukemia patients (295 B-ALL, 98.3%) who underwent allo-HSCT after CAR-T therapy. Somatic mutation screening via next-generation sequencing was performed on 179 patients. Univariate Cox regression analyzed factors associated with transplant outcomes. A contemporaneous cohort of 36 transplanted patients without prior CAR-T served as a comparator. Results: Median age at transplant was 14 years (range, 1-68). Prior to HSCT, 220 (73.3%), 75 (25.0%), and 5 (1.7%) patients received CD19-, CD22-, and Mix-CAR-T, respectively; 265 (88.3%) achieved complete remission (CR), and 39 (13.0%) were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for the CAR-T bridging cohort were 64.0% (95%CI, 58.6-69.8%), 74.5% (95%CI, 69.5-79.9%), 28.4% (95%CI, 23.6-34.1%), and 7.6% (95%CI, 5.04-11.3%), respectively. Outcomes did not differ significantly from the non-CAR-T cohort (OS, p=0.54; DFS, p=0.24). Failure to achieve CR pre-HSCT (HR=3.31, p<0.0001) and MRD-positivity (HR=3.69, p<0.0001) were risk factors for relapse, while chronic graft-versus-host disease was protective (HR=0.35, p=0.0002). Pre-HSCT MRD-positivity, fungal infection, and viral cystitis increased NRM risk. TP53 (15.1%), KMT2D (14.5%), NRAS (14.0%), KRAS (13.4%), and ABL1 (9.5%) were the most frequently mutated genes. TP53 mutation was a significant risk factor for inferior DFS (HR=3.37, p<0.0001) and OS (HR=3.56, p<0.0001). GNAS and KDM6A mutations predicted higher CIR, while ETV6 mutation was associated with increased NRM. Conclusions: Bridging to allo-HSCT after CAR-T therapy is a feasible and effective strategy for R/R B-ALL, providing substantial long-term survival. Achieving pre-transplant CR and MRD-negative status is critical for outcome. Somatic mutations, particularly TP53, hold significant prognostic value, aiding in risk stratification and treatment optimization for these patients.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
302 Military Hospital of China (CN), Beijing Fengtai Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.