Evaluating the Utility of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening in Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Elective Orthopaedic Surgery

BACKGROUND: Use of preoperative Staphylococcus aureus nasal screening and decolonization varies across orthopaedic surgery. The efficacy of universal nasal screening with regard to surgical site infection (SSI) rates remains unclear, particularly in elective orthopaedic procedures. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent elective orthopaedic surgery. Patients were stratified by S. aureus nasal screening status within 90 days prior to surgery. Deep SSI (within 90 days postoperatively) was the primary outcome, and superficial SSI (within 7 to 30 days postoperatively) was defined as the secondary outcome. We used doubly robust adjustment involving propensity-score matching on 9 variables followed by logistic regression analysis with demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: The cohorts comprised 25,005 patients each (mean age, 63 years; 51% female; 88% White). After adjustment, screening was associated with lower odds of developing deep SSI (odds ratio [OR], 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39 to 0.70]; p < 0.001) and superficial SSI (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.73]; p < 0.001). A positive, versus negative, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) result was associated with an increased risk of deep (1.47% versus 0.41%; OR, 3.65 [95% CI, 1.59 to 8.38]; p < 0.001) and superficial (12.96% versus 7.63%; OR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.34 to 2.42]; p < 0.001) SSI. Among screened patients with a deep SSI, only 5.7% had tested positive for MRSA on the screening test. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative S. aureus nasal screening was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of developing deep and superficial SSIs following elective orthopaedic surgery. However, the overall incidence of deep infection was low, and the MRSA infection rate was negligible. These findings suggest that universal S. aureus nasal screening may have limited value and support consideration of targeted screening in higher-risk surgical populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.25.01171
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Utility of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening in Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Elective Orthopaedic Surgery

Daniel G. Tobert, Grace X. Xiong, Stephanie T. Kha, A.R. Lucaciu et al.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Evaluating the Utility of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening in Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Elective Orthopaedic Surgery

Daniel G. Tobert, Grace X. Xiong, Stephanie T. Kha, A.R. Lucaciu, R.J.P. van der Wal, J. Coan, A. Gholipour, L.J. Leijs
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of preoperative Staphylococcus aureus nasal screening and decolonization varies across orthopaedic surgery. The efficacy of universal nasal screening with regard to surgical site infection (SSI) rates remains unclear, particularly in elective orthopaedic procedures. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent elective orthopaedic surgery. Patients were stratified by S. aureus nasal screening status within 90 days prior to surgery. Deep SSI (within 90 days postoperatively) was the primary outcome, and superficial SSI (within 7 to 30 days postoperatively) was defined as the secondary outcome. We used doubly robust adjustment involving propensity-score matching on 9 variables followed by logistic regression analysis with demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: The cohorts comprised 25,005 patients each (mean age, 63 years; 51% female; 88% White). After adjustment, screening was associated with lower odds of developing deep SSI (odds ratio [OR], 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39 to 0.70]; p < 0.001) and superficial SSI (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.73]; p < 0.001). A positive, versus negative, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) result was associated with an increased risk of deep (1.47% versus 0.41%; OR, 3.65 [95% CI, 1.59 to 8.38]; p < 0.001) and superficial (12.96% versus 7.63%; OR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.34 to 2.42]; p < 0.001) SSI. Among screened patients with a deep SSI, only 5.7% had tested positive for MRSA on the screening test. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative S. aureus nasal screening was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of developing deep and superficial SSIs following elective orthopaedic surgery. However, the overall incidence of deep infection was low, and the MRSA infection rate was negligible. These findings suggest that universal S. aureus nasal screening may have limited value and support consideration of targeted screening in higher-risk surgical populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US), Mass General Brigham (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.