Developing harmonized tumor microenvironment subtypes for patient stratification in clinical trials.

3120 Background: Accurate patient stratification by tumor microenvironment (TME) is critical for optimizing immunotherapy and targeted therapy outcomes. Existing transcriptome-based classification methods often focus on limited TME aspects and tumor types, restricting their clinical utility. Here, we developed a harmonized (H) TME classification by integrating findings from published pan-cancer TME profiling with reported immune evasion mechanisms. Methods: We used agglomerative clustering of gene signature scores (ssGSEA) and pathway activities (PROGENy) encompassing immune cells, fibrosis, vascularization, hypoxia, and other signals to acquire 9 transcriptomic HTME subtypes (Table 1) independently on TCGA (n=7,362) and internal (n=5,186) pan-cancer cohorts with high reproducibility (Spearman r =0.94). Next, we validated the subtypes on 29,875 solid cancer samples from open-source transcriptomic datasets by applying the K-Nearest Neighbors classifier. Differential expression analysis followed by Spearman correlation and PCA were used for comparison among classifications. Adjusted Cox models for survival and logistic regressions for response were applied. Results: Correlative analysis between existing classifications and HTME subtypes revealed patient stratification along 3 principal biological axes: adaptive immune response vs. tumor cell activity, fibrosis vs. antigen-presenting activity, and proliferation vs. vascularization, with, HTME uniquely covering all three axes. When applied to the selected clinical cohorts, HTME effectively distinguished patients by response (logOR) or progression-free survival (logHR) in a diagnosis- and therapy-specific manner (Table 1; showing values with p≤0.05). Conclusions: The proposed HTME patient stratification framework, publicly available and applicable to any RNA-seq sample, constitutes a practical tool for biomarker discovery and trial design across solid tumors. logOR and logHR metrics of HTME subtypes based on diagnosis and treatment type. BRCA Basal-like, Luminal, Normal-like; ICIlogOR [CI] BRCA HER2+; anti-HER2logOR [CI] ccRCC; TKIPFS logHR [CI] ccRCC; anti-VEGFR+anti-PDL1PFS logHR [CI] ccRCC; anti-mTORPFS logHR [CI] SKCM; ICIlogOR [CI] NSCLC; ICIlogOR [CI] Lymphoid-Cell-Enriched B-Cell-Enriched/Angiogenic -0.9 [-1.5, -0.3]** -0.7 [-1.4, -0.1]* 1.1 [0.2, 2.0]* Immune-Enriched/Hypoxic -1.8 [-3.2, -0.4]* 0.6 [0.1, 1.0]** 1.1 [0.4, 1.8]** -1.3 [-2.5, -0.1]* Highly Immune-Enriched/Inflamed -2.9 [-5.3, -0.4]* -1.5 [-2.3, -0.6]*** 1.1 [0.2, 1.9]* -2.1 [-3.6, -0.5]** -1.1 [-1.9, -0.2]* Immune-Enriched/Fibrotic 1.0 [0.5, 1.6]*** 2.3 [0.6, 4.1]** Fibrotic/Angiogenic/Myeloid 0.9 [0.4, 1.3]*** Fibrotic/Hypoxic 1.4 [0.4, 2.5]** Immune Desert 0.8 [0.0, 1.5]* 1.2 [0.2, 2.2]* 0.6 [0.1, 1.2]* Desert/Angiogenic 1.1 [0.1, 2.1]* -0.6 [-1.1, -0.1]* <jats:td c

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.3120
Primary Topic
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing harmonized tumor microenvironment subtypes for patient stratification in clinical trials.

Syune Ambaryan, Elena Ocheredko, Nathan Fowler, Nadezhda Lukashevich et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
article

Developing harmonized tumor microenvironment subtypes for patient stratification in clinical trials.

Syune Ambaryan, Elena Ocheredko, Nathan Fowler, Nadezhda Lukashevich, Anastasia Zotova, Michael Goldberg, Maria Savchenko, Sheila Yong, Sofya Kust, Aleksander Bagaev, Mikhail Shugay
article en

Abstract

3120 Background: Accurate patient stratification by tumor microenvironment (TME) is critical for optimizing immunotherapy and targeted therapy outcomes. Existing transcriptome-based classification methods often focus on limited TME aspects and tumor types, restricting their clinical utility. Here, we developed a harmonized (H) TME classification by integrating findings from published pan-cancer TME profiling with reported immune evasion mechanisms. Methods: We used agglomerative clustering of gene signature scores (ssGSEA) and pathway activities (PROGENy) encompassing immune cells, fibrosis, vascularization, hypoxia, and other signals to acquire 9 transcriptomic HTME subtypes (Table 1) independently on TCGA (n=7,362) and internal (n=5,186) pan-cancer cohorts with high reproducibility (Spearman r =0.94). Next, we validated the subtypes on 29,875 solid cancer samples from open-source transcriptomic datasets by applying the K-Nearest Neighbors classifier. Differential expression analysis followed by Spearman correlation and PCA were used for comparison among classifications. Adjusted Cox models for survival and logistic regressions for response were applied. Results: Correlative analysis between existing classifications and HTME subtypes revealed patient stratification along 3 principal biological axes: adaptive immune response vs. tumor cell activity, fibrosis vs. antigen-presenting activity, and proliferation vs. vascularization, with, HTME uniquely covering all three axes. When applied to the selected clinical cohorts, HTME effectively distinguished patients by response (logOR) or progression-free survival (logHR) in a diagnosis- and therapy-specific manner (Table 1; showing values with p≤0.05). Conclusions: The proposed HTME patient stratification framework, publicly available and applicable to any RNA-seq sample, constitutes a practical tool for biomarker discovery and trial design across solid tumors. logOR and logHR metrics of HTME subtypes based on diagnosis and treatment type. BRCA Basal-like, Luminal, Normal-like; ICIlogOR [CI] BRCA HER2+; anti-HER2logOR [CI] ccRCC; TKIPFS logHR [CI] ccRCC; anti-VEGFR+anti-PDL1PFS logHR [CI] ccRCC; anti-mTORPFS logHR [CI] SKCM; ICIlogOR [CI] NSCLC; ICIlogOR [CI] Lymphoid-Cell-Enriched B-Cell-Enriched/Angiogenic -0.9 [-1.5, -0.3]** -0.7 [-1.4, -0.1]* 1.1 [0.2, 2.0]* Immune-Enriched/Hypoxic -1.8 [-3.2, -0.4]* 0.6 [0.1, 1.0]** 1.1 [0.4, 1.8]** -1.3 [-2.5, -0.1]* Highly Immune-Enriched/Inflamed -2.9 [-5.3, -0.4]* -1.5 [-2.3, -0.6]*** 1.1 [0.2, 1.9]* -2.1 [-3.6, -0.5]** -1.1 [-1.9, -0.2]* Immune-Enriched/Fibrotic 1.0 [0.5, 1.6]*** 2.3 [0.6, 4.1]** Fibrotic/Angiogenic/Myeloid 0.9 [0.4, 1.3]*** Fibrotic/Hypoxic 1.4 [0.4, 2.5]** Immune Desert 0.8 [0.0, 1.5]* 1.2 [0.2, 2.2]* 0.6 [0.1, 1.2]* Desert/Angiogenic 1.1 [0.1, 2.1]* -0.6 [-1.1, -0.1]* <jats:td c

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Repligen (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.