Optimal timing of endocrine therapy interruption for pregnancy in young women with hormone receptor–positive early breast cancer.

627 Background: The POSITIVE trial showed that temporary interruption of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) after 18–30 months to attempt pregnancy did not increase short-term recurrence risk in young women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). However, whether this effect varies by baseline recurrence risk and the timing of interruption remains uncertain. Methods: Using the French National Health Data System (SNDS), we emulated two target trials among women aged ≤42 years with early-stage HR+ BC diagnosed between 2011 and 2020. Trial 1 emulated the POSITIVE design, comparing ET interruption at 18–30 months with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 months. Trial 2 compared nine ET-interruption windows (6-month intervals) with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 or ≥60 months. The primary endpoint was the 5-year risk of BC events. Analyses used a clone–censor–weight approach with marginal structural models. Results: In Trial 1 (n = 10,835), ET interruption at 18–30 months was associated with a 5-year BC event risk of 17.2%, compared with 16.0% for uninterrupted ET ≥24 months (risk difference, 1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.7 to 3.1). Risk varied by baseline recurrence risk: interruption had minimal impact in low- or intermediate-risk women (risk difference, −0.6 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.7 to 1.6) but increased risk in high-risk women (risk difference, 5.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 10.0). In Trial 2 (n = 22,916), earlier ET interruption was associated with higher 5-year BC risk, which decreased with longer prior ET duration. Compared with uninterrupted ET ≥24 months, interruption at 6–12 months increased risk by 8.3 percentage points, whereas interruption at 24–30 months increased risk by 2.7 percentage points. Low- or intermediate-risk women showed comparable risk when interruption occurred at 24–30 months, whereas high-risk women required ≥36–42 months of ET to achieve similar safety. Among pregnancy-seeking women, 64% conceived, and 47% resumed ET. Conclusions: The oncologic impact of temporary ET interruption depends on baseline recurrence risk and prior ET duration. Interruption after 24 months appears safe for low- or intermediate-risk women, whereas high-risk patients may benefit from delaying interruption to at least 36 months. These findings support a risk-adapted approach to fertility counseling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.627
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal timing of endocrine therapy interruption for pregnancy in young women with hormone receptor–positive early breast cancer.

Anne‐Sophie Hamy, Floriane Jochum, Paul Gougis, Marine Osada et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Optimal timing of endocrine therapy interruption for pregnancy in young women with hormone receptor–positive early breast cancer.

Anne‐Sophie Hamy, Floriane Jochum, Paul Gougis, Marine Osada, Élise Dumas, Chérif Akladios, Sylvie Giacchetti, Kerollos Wanis, Marc Espie, Florence Coussy, Fabien Reyal
article en

Abstract

627 Background: The POSITIVE trial showed that temporary interruption of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) after 18–30 months to attempt pregnancy did not increase short-term recurrence risk in young women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). However, whether this effect varies by baseline recurrence risk and the timing of interruption remains uncertain. Methods: Using the French National Health Data System (SNDS), we emulated two target trials among women aged ≤42 years with early-stage HR+ BC diagnosed between 2011 and 2020. Trial 1 emulated the POSITIVE design, comparing ET interruption at 18–30 months with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 months. Trial 2 compared nine ET-interruption windows (6-month intervals) with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 or ≥60 months. The primary endpoint was the 5-year risk of BC events. Analyses used a clone–censor–weight approach with marginal structural models. Results: In Trial 1 (n = 10,835), ET interruption at 18–30 months was associated with a 5-year BC event risk of 17.2%, compared with 16.0% for uninterrupted ET ≥24 months (risk difference, 1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.7 to 3.1). Risk varied by baseline recurrence risk: interruption had minimal impact in low- or intermediate-risk women (risk difference, −0.6 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.7 to 1.6) but increased risk in high-risk women (risk difference, 5.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 10.0). In Trial 2 (n = 22,916), earlier ET interruption was associated with higher 5-year BC risk, which decreased with longer prior ET duration. Compared with uninterrupted ET ≥24 months, interruption at 6–12 months increased risk by 8.3 percentage points, whereas interruption at 24–30 months increased risk by 2.7 percentage points. Low- or intermediate-risk women showed comparable risk when interruption occurred at 24–30 months, whereas high-risk women required ≥36–42 months of ET to achieve similar safety. Among pregnancy-seeking women, 64% conceived, and 47% resumed ET. Conclusions: The oncologic impact of temporary ET interruption depends on baseline recurrence risk and prior ET duration. Interruption after 24 months appears safe for low- or intermediate-risk women, whereas high-risk patients may benefit from delaying interruption to at least 36 months. These findings support a risk-adapted approach to fertility counseling.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Inserm (FR), University of Zurich (CH), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR), Institut Jean Godinot (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR), Institut Curie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.