Updated overall survival results from a randomized phase III trial of non–cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in HR+/HER2−/lymph node–positive breast cancer with residual disease following neoad

506 Background: Patients with HR+/HER2−, node-positive breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represent a high-risk population yet substantial recurrence risk. Whether additional non-cross-resistant chemotherapy after surgery provides long-term survival benefit beyond endocrine therapy remains uncertain. Our previous analysis of this phase III trial (NCT01019616) with shorter follow-up (median, 72.4 months) did not show a statistically significant survival benefit. Here we report updated survival outcomes with extended follow-up. Methods: Women aged < 65 years with invasive HR+/HER2−, node-positive breast cancer who completed anthracycline-containing NAC and had residual disease (Miller–Payne grade 1–3 and/or residual nodal involvement) were randomized 1:1 to receive either 4 cycles of non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (CT+ET) or endocrine therapy alone (ET). The primary endpoint was distant disease-free survival (DDFS); overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models with multivariable adjustment. Results: A total of 379 patients were randomized (CT+ET, n = 187; ET, n = 192) with balanced baseline characteristics. At median follow-up of 135.0 months, 52 deaths occurred: 18 (9.6%) in CT+ET versus 34 (17.7%) in ET. OS was significantly improved with CT+ET (log-rank P = 0.023). Ten-year OS rates were 89.9% versus 82.9% (adjusted HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32–0.99; P = 0.048). DDFS showed a favorable trend ( P = 0.059) with 10-year rates of 85.5% versus 78.3% (adjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41–1.09). Greatest benefit was observed in patients with residual node-positive disease (OS HR, 0.47) and Miller–Payne grade 3 response (OS HR, 0.31). Conclusions: This randomized phase III trial demonstrates long-term overall survival benefit from the addition of non-cross-resistant chemotherapy to endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2−, node-positive patients with residual disease after NAC. Clinical trial information: NCT01019616 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.506
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updated overall survival results from a randomized phase III trial of non–cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in HR+/HER2−/lymph node–positive breast cancer with residual disease following neoad

Zhaoqing Fan, Yang Yang, Tao Ouyang, Yingjian He
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Updated overall survival results from a randomized phase III trial of non–cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in HR+/HER2−/lymph node–positive breast cancer with residual disease following neoad

Zhaoqing Fan, Yang Yang, Tao Ouyang, Yingjian He
article en

Abstract

506 Background: Patients with HR+/HER2−, node-positive breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represent a high-risk population yet substantial recurrence risk. Whether additional non-cross-resistant chemotherapy after surgery provides long-term survival benefit beyond endocrine therapy remains uncertain. Our previous analysis of this phase III trial (NCT01019616) with shorter follow-up (median, 72.4 months) did not show a statistically significant survival benefit. Here we report updated survival outcomes with extended follow-up. Methods: Women aged < 65 years with invasive HR+/HER2−, node-positive breast cancer who completed anthracycline-containing NAC and had residual disease (Miller–Payne grade 1–3 and/or residual nodal involvement) were randomized 1:1 to receive either 4 cycles of non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (CT+ET) or endocrine therapy alone (ET). The primary endpoint was distant disease-free survival (DDFS); overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models with multivariable adjustment. Results: A total of 379 patients were randomized (CT+ET, n = 187; ET, n = 192) with balanced baseline characteristics. At median follow-up of 135.0 months, 52 deaths occurred: 18 (9.6%) in CT+ET versus 34 (17.7%) in ET. OS was significantly improved with CT+ET (log-rank P = 0.023). Ten-year OS rates were 89.9% versus 82.9% (adjusted HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32–0.99; P = 0.048). DDFS showed a favorable trend ( P = 0.059) with 10-year rates of 85.5% versus 78.3% (adjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41–1.09). Greatest benefit was observed in patients with residual node-positive disease (OS HR, 0.47) and Miller–Payne grade 3 response (OS HR, 0.31). Conclusions: This randomized phase III trial demonstrates long-term overall survival benefit from the addition of non-cross-resistant chemotherapy to endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2−, node-positive patients with residual disease after NAC. Clinical trial information: NCT01019616 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Ministry of Education (ET)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.