Final analysis of the investigator-initiated randomized study of anti–PD-L1 durvalumab (durva) with radiation versus chemoradiation (CRT) for intermediate-risk HPV-positive (HPV+) locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OPSCC): Can

6017 Background: Primary immunotherapy (IO) with radiotherapy remains an investigational approach in HPV+ LA-OPSCC. The CCTG-led international phase II, randomized, non-comparative, HN.9 (NCT03410615) trial evaluated the efficacy of the of durva+RT as a chemo-sparing approach in patients (pts) with intermediate-risk, HPV+, LA-OPSCC. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed, PDL1-unselected, pathologically proven, treatment-naïve HPV+ LA-OPSCC (UICC/AJCC 8th Edition T1-2N1 or T3N0-1 smokers [≥10 pack years] or T1-3 N2 with any smoking history) eligible for definitive CRT were randomized (1:2) to Arm A (CRT: 70Gy/35F + cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Q3W on days 1,22,43 of RT) vs Arm B (durva IV 1500 mg, days -7, 22 of RT, followed by adjuvant durva for 6 doses). Primary objective was 3-year EFS in Arm B (efficacy if one-sided 90% CI lower bound [LB] >83%). Secondary objectives: QoL (MDADI, FACT-HN at baseline, end of RT, 3,6,12,24 and 36 mo), OS, safety, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional control (LRC). Safety was assessed per CTCAE v5. The trial closed early based on emerging external efficacy data of IO in HN LA setting, enrolling 129 pts overall (80 of the planned 120 in Arm B) with approximately 80% power retained for the primary analysis. Results: 129 pts were randomized across 21 Canadian and European sites. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. At the data cutoff (Sep 19, 2025), median follow-up time was 55.7 mo. In both arms, all pts received the planned RT schedule. In Arm A, the median number of cisplatin cycles was 2 (21% received <200m/m 2 and 79%≥ 200 mg/m 2 ). In arm B, all pts (100%) received durva concurrent to RT. 126 pts were eligible for efficacy analysis. The estimated 3-year EFS in Arm B was 80% (one-sided 90% CI: LB 73%); the prespecified efficacy criterion (LB >83%) was not met. The 3-year EFS in Arm A was 89%. The estimated 3-year OS rates were 92% in both arms. At 3 years, LRC were 97 and 91% in Arms A and B respectively. DMFS was 89% in Arm A and 86% in Arm B. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events any time during trial were similar between Arm B (69%) and Arm A (63%). QoL completion was 96% at baseline and 80%+ throughout; acute worsening during RT followed by gradual recovery (slower in arm B during adjuvant durva), with longer-term persistence of isolated issues (hearing loss, dry mouth) was similar to published experience for drug+RT regimens. Conclusions: Durva+RT did not improve 3-year EFS in the overall patient population of intermediate-risk HPV+ OPSCC. No new safety signal was observed. Specific toxicities varied by arm, but overall QoL experience, including swallowing, was similar between arms and with prior trials. Subgroup analysis, blood, tissue and microbiome-based correlates are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03410615 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.6017
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Final analysis of the investigator-initiated randomized study of anti–PD-L1 durvalumab (durva) with radiation versus chemoradiation (CRT) for intermediate-risk HPV-positive (HPV+) locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OPSCC): Can

Craig Harlos, Khalil Sultanem, J RINGASH, J WALDRON et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Final analysis of the investigator-initiated randomized study of anti–PD-L1 durvalumab (durva) with radiation versus chemoradiation (CRT) for intermediate-risk HPV-positive (HPV+) locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OPSCC): Can

Craig Harlos, Khalil Sultanem, J RINGASH, J WALDRON, Osama Souied, Alexander V. Louie, Scott Victor Bratman, Wendy R. Parulekar, C Wang, Anna Spreafico, John Hilton, Kate Whelan, Andrew Robinson, Jean-Pascal H. Machiels, Lisa F. L. Licitra, Lillian L. Siu, Wei Tu, John WT Walker, Marc Oliva, Andrea McNiven
article en

Abstract

6017 Background: Primary immunotherapy (IO) with radiotherapy remains an investigational approach in HPV+ LA-OPSCC. The CCTG-led international phase II, randomized, non-comparative, HN.9 (NCT03410615) trial evaluated the efficacy of the of durva+RT as a chemo-sparing approach in patients (pts) with intermediate-risk, HPV+, LA-OPSCC. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed, PDL1-unselected, pathologically proven, treatment-naïve HPV+ LA-OPSCC (UICC/AJCC 8th Edition T1-2N1 or T3N0-1 smokers [≥10 pack years] or T1-3 N2 with any smoking history) eligible for definitive CRT were randomized (1:2) to Arm A (CRT: 70Gy/35F + cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Q3W on days 1,22,43 of RT) vs Arm B (durva IV 1500 mg, days -7, 22 of RT, followed by adjuvant durva for 6 doses). Primary objective was 3-year EFS in Arm B (efficacy if one-sided 90% CI lower bound [LB] >83%). Secondary objectives: QoL (MDADI, FACT-HN at baseline, end of RT, 3,6,12,24 and 36 mo), OS, safety, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional control (LRC). Safety was assessed per CTCAE v5. The trial closed early based on emerging external efficacy data of IO in HN LA setting, enrolling 129 pts overall (80 of the planned 120 in Arm B) with approximately 80% power retained for the primary analysis. Results: 129 pts were randomized across 21 Canadian and European sites. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. At the data cutoff (Sep 19, 2025), median follow-up time was 55.7 mo. In both arms, all pts received the planned RT schedule. In Arm A, the median number of cisplatin cycles was 2 (21% received <200m/m 2 and 79%≥ 200 mg/m 2 ). In arm B, all pts (100%) received durva concurrent to RT. 126 pts were eligible for efficacy analysis. The estimated 3-year EFS in Arm B was 80% (one-sided 90% CI: LB 73%); the prespecified efficacy criterion (LB >83%) was not met. The 3-year EFS in Arm A was 89%. The estimated 3-year OS rates were 92% in both arms. At 3 years, LRC were 97 and 91% in Arms A and B respectively. DMFS was 89% in Arm A and 86% in Arm B. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events any time during trial were similar between Arm B (69%) and Arm A (63%). QoL completion was 96% at baseline and 80%+ throughout; acute worsening during RT followed by gradual recovery (slower in arm B during adjuvant durva), with longer-term persistence of isolated issues (hearing loss, dry mouth) was similar to published experience for drug+RT regimens. Conclusions: Durva+RT did not improve 3-year EFS in the overall patient population of intermediate-risk HPV+ OPSCC. No new safety signal was observed. Specific toxicities varied by arm, but overall QoL experience, including swallowing, was similar between arms and with prior trials. Subgroup analysis, blood, tissue and microbiome-based correlates are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03410615 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University Health Network (CA), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Kingston General Hospital (CA), Jewish General Hospital (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES), CancerCare Manitoba (CA), Health and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke (CA), Alberta Cancer Foundation (CA), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Manitoba (CA), UCLouvain (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.