Assessment of the “world guidelines for falls prevention and management” algorithm in older volunteers

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: 30% of people aged 65 + fall at least once a year. The "world guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative" (WGFs) have published an algorithm for fall risk prediction (low, intermediate or high risk) and proposed measures requiring health resources adapted to the risk level. We performed a real-life study to estimate the distribution of fall risk categories according to the WGFs algorithm in a population of old volunteers. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in unselected 65-85-year-old participants attending an information meeting on WGFs falls and wishing a personalized assessment of their falls-risk. RESULTS: Among the 165 participants tested (mean age: 78.3 ± 6.1, 82% females), the number of fallers was significantly higher (51.2% 95% CL: 43.6-58.8%). than in previous published studies testing the WFGs. The intermediate risk concerned 15.1% and the high risk 47.3% of participants. In fallers, 90.1% were at high risk. CONCLUSION: Information meetings about the WGFs could raise awareness among older people and help identify people at high risk of falling. In accordance with previous studies, most fallers would be classified at high risk of falling by using the WGFs, which makes it difficult to propose the multifactorial assessments and tailored interventions recommended by the WGFs in around 25% of all 65+.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-026-03405-4
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the “world guidelines for falls prevention and management” algorithm in older volunteers

Hubert Blain, J Bousquet, Olivier Coste, M.-C. Picot et al.
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Assessment of the “world guidelines for falls prevention and management” algorithm in older volunteers

Hubert Blain, J Bousquet, Olivier Coste, M.-C. Picot, Gilles Berrut, Pierre Louis Bernard, Maxence Josset
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: 30% of people aged 65 + fall at least once a year. The "world guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative" (WGFs) have published an algorithm for fall risk prediction (low, intermediate or high risk) and proposed measures requiring health resources adapted to the risk level. We performed a real-life study to estimate the distribution of fall risk categories according to the WGFs algorithm in a population of old volunteers. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in unselected 65-85-year-old participants attending an information meeting on WGFs falls and wishing a personalized assessment of their falls-risk. RESULTS: Among the 165 participants tested (mean age: 78.3 ± 6.1, 82% females), the number of fallers was significantly higher (51.2% 95% CL: 43.6-58.8%). than in previous published studies testing the WFGs. The intermediate risk concerned 15.1% and the high risk 47.3% of participants. In fallers, 90.1% were at high risk. CONCLUSION: Information meetings about the WGFs could raise awareness among older people and help identify people at high risk of falling. In accordance with previous studies, most fallers would be classified at high risk of falling by using the WGFs, which makes it difficult to propose the multifactorial assessments and tailored interventions recommended by the WGFs in around 25% of all 65+.

Aging Clinical and Experimental ResearchVol. 38(1)
Airbus (France) (FR), Inserm (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Service de Santé de la Jeunesse (CH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier (FR), Hôpital Saint Charles (FR), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.