Effectiveness and safety of IBI310 combined with sintilimab versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): A randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter phase III clinical study.

4148 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have demonstrated efficacy in aHCC. Despite improved outcomes with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based regimens, prognosis remains poor and there is a continued unmet need for alternative therapies with long-term survival benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IBI310 (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) combined with sintilimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in the first-line treatment of aHCC. Methods: Pts were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to IBI310+sintilimab group or sorafenib group. The experimental group received IBI310 3mg/kg intravenously (IV) and sintilimab 200 mg IV on day 1 of every 3 weeks. The control group received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily (BID) continuously until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death or other protocol-specified discontinuation criteria. During the study, the IBI310 dose was adjusted to 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. Primary end points included overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR)assessed by the independent radiology review committee (IRRC) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), safety, etc. Results: As of August 2022, 344 patients were enrolled and allocated to Group 1 (G1, IBI310 3mg/kg + sintilimab, n=84), Group 2 (G2, modified-dose IBI310 1mg/kg + sintilimab, n=145) and Group 3 (G3, sorafenib, n=115). Overall, PFS and ORR improved with IBI310+sintilimab vs Sorafenib. The median OS in the primary endpoint was 44.0 months(G1), 36.1 months(G2) and 22.9 months(G3), respectively. Confirmed ORRs were significantly higher in the combination therapy groups (G1: 41.7%; G2: 22.1%) versus the control group (2.6%). Median PFS of three groups were 13.5 months(G1), 6.1 months(G2) and 2.8 months(G3), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 60.7% (G1), 34.7% (G2), and 35.1% (G3) of patients. Conclusions: Compared with sorafenib group, combination treatment of IBI310 + sintilimab as first-line treatment demonstrated survival benefits and a manageable safety profile in aHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04720716 . Survival data. IBI310(3mg/kg)+Sintilimab(N=84) IBI310(1mg/kg)+Sintilimab(N=145) Sorafenib(N=115) mOS, m 44.0 36.1 22.9 Confirmed ORR, n(%) 35(41.7) 32(22.1) 3(2.6) mPFS, m 13.5 6.1 2.8

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.4148
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and safety of IBI310 combined with sintilimab versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): A randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter phase III clinical study.

Feixiang Wu, 任正刚, J Liu, Rui Liao et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Effectiveness and safety of IBI310 combined with sintilimab versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): A randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter phase III clinical study.

Feixiang Wu, 任正刚, J Liu, Rui Liao, B Zhang, Zhengwen Cai, G X Li, Jia Luo, Jun Yao, Wei Wang, Wei-Dong Jia, Jia Fan, Jin Lu, Chaoliu Dai, Yanqiao Zhang
article en

Abstract

4148 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have demonstrated efficacy in aHCC. Despite improved outcomes with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based regimens, prognosis remains poor and there is a continued unmet need for alternative therapies with long-term survival benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IBI310 (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) combined with sintilimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in the first-line treatment of aHCC. Methods: Pts were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to IBI310+sintilimab group or sorafenib group. The experimental group received IBI310 3mg/kg intravenously (IV) and sintilimab 200 mg IV on day 1 of every 3 weeks. The control group received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily (BID) continuously until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death or other protocol-specified discontinuation criteria. During the study, the IBI310 dose was adjusted to 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. Primary end points included overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR)assessed by the independent radiology review committee (IRRC) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), safety, etc. Results: As of August 2022, 344 patients were enrolled and allocated to Group 1 (G1, IBI310 3mg/kg + sintilimab, n=84), Group 2 (G2, modified-dose IBI310 1mg/kg + sintilimab, n=145) and Group 3 (G3, sorafenib, n=115). Overall, PFS and ORR improved with IBI310+sintilimab vs Sorafenib. The median OS in the primary endpoint was 44.0 months(G1), 36.1 months(G2) and 22.9 months(G3), respectively. Confirmed ORRs were significantly higher in the combination therapy groups (G1: 41.7%; G2: 22.1%) versus the control group (2.6%). Median PFS of three groups were 13.5 months(G1), 6.1 months(G2) and 2.8 months(G3), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 60.7% (G1), 34.7% (G2), and 35.1% (G3) of patients. Conclusions: Compared with sorafenib group, combination treatment of IBI310 + sintilimab as first-line treatment demonstrated survival benefits and a manageable safety profile in aHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04720716 . Survival data. IBI310(3mg/kg)+Sintilimab(N=84) IBI310(1mg/kg)+Sintilimab(N=145) Sorafenib(N=115) mOS, m 44.0 36.1 22.9 Confirmed ORR, n(%) 35(41.7) 32(22.1) 3(2.6) mPFS, m 13.5 6.1 2.8

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Harbin Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Guangxi Medical University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital (CN), Tongji Hospital (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN), China Medical University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Good health and well-being, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.