Racial representation in clinical trials supporting NCCN breast cancer guidelines: A retrospective analysis.

1651 Background: Racial disparities in breast cancer are well established, with Black women having disproportionately higher mortality rates. The NCCN guidelines are valuable in the management of breast cancer, highlighting the importance of evaluating racial representation and its trends over time within the studies cited in these guidelines. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 735 references cited in NCCN Breast Cancer Guidelines Version 4.2025. All clinical trials were included, while reviews, case reports, and non-clinical references were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was the reporting of racial demographics within each reference. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess statistically significant differences in racial representation across time periods. Results: Of 735 references screened, 384 met the inclusion criteria, and 89 (23%) reported racial demographics. Studies reported a total of 87.9% White, 4.5% Black, 4.1% Asian, 0.5% Hispanic, 0.1% American Indian/Alaska Native, 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 0.1% reporting more than one race. Time block 5 had significantly more reported races than blocks 2, 3, and 4 (p-value < 0.05). A statistically significant decrease in percentage reported as White was seen when comparing time blocks 1 to 5 (p = 0.0495), 2 to 5 (p = 0.0336), and 2 to 6 (p = 0.028). Changes in representation among other racial groups were primarily driven by Black and Asian groups, with Asians comprising the largest proportion in time blocks 4 (6.1%) and 6 (17.9%), while the Black race was the largest group in all other time blocks. All other racial groups remained consistently low across time blocks. Conclusions: Only 23% of references reported racial data. While the proportion of the White race decreased over time and an increased representation of other racial groups was observed, the overall reporting of these groups remained low across all time periods. This emphasizes the need for standardized reporting of race in clinical trials to ensure that NCCN guidelines accurately reflect the diversity of patients in breast cancer care. Race demographics from clinical trials cited in the NCCN breast cancer guidelines. Time block Time Bracket Percentage of White Percentage of Non-White Percentage of Black Percentage of Asian Percentage of Hispanic Percentage of AI/AN Percentage of NI/PI Percentage of More than one race 1 1980-1999 95.6% 1.6% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2 2000-2004 92.4% 1.4% 4.6% 0.1% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 3 2005-2009 86.9% 5.4% 5.2% 1.6% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4 2010-2014 88.7% 1.8% 2.8% 6.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 5 2015-2019 87.1% 1.8% 5.7% 4.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 6 2020-2025 78.3% 0.2% 3.1% 17.9% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% Total 87.9% 2.7% 4.5% 4.1%

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1651
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial representation in clinical trials supporting NCCN breast cancer guidelines: A retrospective analysis.

Niket Shah, Shreya Motkur, Sarah Gergis, Angel Dongol et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Racial representation in clinical trials supporting NCCN breast cancer guidelines: A retrospective analysis.

Niket Shah, Shreya Motkur, Sarah Gergis, Angel Dongol, Sai Sushrutha Mudupula Vemula, James Hosner, Maha Bayya, Daniel Isaac, Jason Law, Ling Wang, Lakshmi Thulluri, Naomi Shah, Suhail Sapkota, Soumith Sanka
article en

Abstract

1651 Background: Racial disparities in breast cancer are well established, with Black women having disproportionately higher mortality rates. The NCCN guidelines are valuable in the management of breast cancer, highlighting the importance of evaluating racial representation and its trends over time within the studies cited in these guidelines. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 735 references cited in NCCN Breast Cancer Guidelines Version 4.2025. All clinical trials were included, while reviews, case reports, and non-clinical references were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was the reporting of racial demographics within each reference. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess statistically significant differences in racial representation across time periods. Results: Of 735 references screened, 384 met the inclusion criteria, and 89 (23%) reported racial demographics. Studies reported a total of 87.9% White, 4.5% Black, 4.1% Asian, 0.5% Hispanic, 0.1% American Indian/Alaska Native, 0.0% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 0.1% reporting more than one race. Time block 5 had significantly more reported races than blocks 2, 3, and 4 (p-value < 0.05). A statistically significant decrease in percentage reported as White was seen when comparing time blocks 1 to 5 (p = 0.0495), 2 to 5 (p = 0.0336), and 2 to 6 (p = 0.028). Changes in representation among other racial groups were primarily driven by Black and Asian groups, with Asians comprising the largest proportion in time blocks 4 (6.1%) and 6 (17.9%), while the Black race was the largest group in all other time blocks. All other racial groups remained consistently low across time blocks. Conclusions: Only 23% of references reported racial data. While the proportion of the White race decreased over time and an increased representation of other racial groups was observed, the overall reporting of these groups remained low across all time periods. This emphasizes the need for standardized reporting of race in clinical trials to ensure that NCCN guidelines accurately reflect the diversity of patients in breast cancer care. Race demographics from clinical trials cited in the NCCN breast cancer guidelines. Time block Time Bracket Percentage of White Percentage of Non-White Percentage of Black Percentage of Asian Percentage of Hispanic Percentage of AI/AN Percentage of NI/PI Percentage of More than one race 1 1980-1999 95.6% 1.6% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2 2000-2004 92.4% 1.4% 4.6% 0.1% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 3 2005-2009 86.9% 5.4% 5.2% 1.6% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4 2010-2014 88.7% 1.8% 2.8% 6.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 5 2015-2019 87.1% 1.8% 5.7% 4.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 6 2020-2025 78.3% 0.2% 3.1% 17.9% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% Total 87.9% 2.7% 4.5% 4.1%

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Sparrow Hospital (US), The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute (US), McLaren Greater Lansing (US), Michigan State University (US), Marshall University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.