Long-term responders to trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the BeTAS real-world study.

3583 Background: The phase III SUNLIGHT trial established trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (FTD/TPI+BEV) as a standard treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of at least two prior regimens. However, limited evidence exists regarding patients achieving durable benefit in routine clinical practice. We aimed to characterize the prevalence, clinical features, and outcomes of long-term responders treated with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in a large real-world cohort. Methods: BeTAS is a multicenter ambispective real-world study conducted within the Galician Research Group on Gastrointestinal Tumors. Consecutive patients with previously treated mCRC receiving FTD/TPI+BEV after failure or intolerance to ≥2 prior regimens were included. Long-term responders (LTRs) were defined using a pre-specified landmark of progression-free survival (PFS) ≥9 months. Baseline characteristics, treatment response, and survival outcomes were compared between LTRs and non-LTRs. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using a 9-month landmark analysis to minimize immortal time bias. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression was performed. Results: Among 576 patients, median PFS and OS were 4.9 months (95% CI 4.3–5.5) and 10.8 months (95% CI 9.8–11.9), respectively. LTRs accounted for 20.3% of the cohort (n=117). Compared with non-LTRs, LTRs more frequently had ≤2 metastatic sites (83.8% vs 67.5%, p =0.001), absence of liver metastases (28.4% vs 16.7%, p =0.004), longer time from metastatic diagnosis ( p =0.046), and Tabernero best prognostic characteristics ( p =0.007). Among evaluable patients, objective response rate was higher in LTRs (22.1% vs 5.5%, p <0.001), as was disease control rate (100% vs 39.0%, p <0.001). Median PFS was 15.3 versus 3.6 months, and landmark OS was 23.5 versus 8.1 months (both p <0.001). Long-term response remained independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14–0.26; p <0.001). Conclusions: In real-world practice, approximately one in five previously treated patients with mCRC achieve durable benefit with FTD/TPI+BEV. Identification of clinical factors associated with long-term response may support improved patient selection in later-line treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.3583
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term responders to trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the BeTAS real-world study.

Elena Gallardo Martín, María Pilar Ochoa Rivas, Marta Llanos, Marcos Melián et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Long-term responders to trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the BeTAS real-world study.

Elena Gallardo Martín, María Pilar Ochoa Rivas, Marta Llanos, Marcos Melián, Sara Agraso Busto, B. Gomez, David Gutiérrez Abad, A. Soilan Lopez, Nieves Martínez Lago, R. Ferreiro Monteagudo, Ismael Ghanem, Sandra López Peraita, Luis Cabezón Gutiérrez, Paula Carla Antonilli, Antia Cousillas Castiñeiras, Ana Fernandez Fernandez Montes, Ana Lopez Alfonso, Martin Perez Martelo, Ana M. Jimenez Gordo, Maria Carmen Riesco Martinez
article en

Abstract

3583 Background: The phase III SUNLIGHT trial established trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (FTD/TPI+BEV) as a standard treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of at least two prior regimens. However, limited evidence exists regarding patients achieving durable benefit in routine clinical practice. We aimed to characterize the prevalence, clinical features, and outcomes of long-term responders treated with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in a large real-world cohort. Methods: BeTAS is a multicenter ambispective real-world study conducted within the Galician Research Group on Gastrointestinal Tumors. Consecutive patients with previously treated mCRC receiving FTD/TPI+BEV after failure or intolerance to ≥2 prior regimens were included. Long-term responders (LTRs) were defined using a pre-specified landmark of progression-free survival (PFS) ≥9 months. Baseline characteristics, treatment response, and survival outcomes were compared between LTRs and non-LTRs. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using a 9-month landmark analysis to minimize immortal time bias. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression was performed. Results: Among 576 patients, median PFS and OS were 4.9 months (95% CI 4.3–5.5) and 10.8 months (95% CI 9.8–11.9), respectively. LTRs accounted for 20.3% of the cohort (n=117). Compared with non-LTRs, LTRs more frequently had ≤2 metastatic sites (83.8% vs 67.5%, p =0.001), absence of liver metastases (28.4% vs 16.7%, p =0.004), longer time from metastatic diagnosis ( p =0.046), and Tabernero best prognostic characteristics ( p =0.007). Among evaluable patients, objective response rate was higher in LTRs (22.1% vs 5.5%, p <0.001), as was disease control rate (100% vs 39.0%, p <0.001). Median PFS was 15.3 versus 3.6 months, and landmark OS was 23.5 versus 8.1 months (both p <0.001). Long-term response remained independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14–0.26; p <0.001). Conclusions: In real-world practice, approximately one in five previously treated patients with mCRC achieve durable benefit with FTD/TPI+BEV. Identification of clinical factors associated with long-term response may support improved patient selection in later-line treatment.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Universidade da Coruña (ES), Hospital Universitario de Canarias (ES), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), University Hospital Complex Of Vigo (ES), Hospital Universitario de Torrejón (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (ES), Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (ES), Hospital Universitario de Burgos (ES), Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (ES), Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (ES), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Ourense (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.