Comparison of Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anesthesia Using Isobaric Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Introduction: Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia is increasingly used as an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of its potential benefits in providing effective intraoperative anesthesia and improved postoperative recovery. The present study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects, block characteristics, and postoperative analgesia effects of isobaric levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine in thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia. Materials and methods: In this prospective comparative study, 60 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups of 30 each. Levobupivacaine was administered intrathecally with fentanyl (25 µg) in one group and levobupivacaine and dexmedetomidine (5 µg) in the other. Hemodynamic parameters, duration of analgesia, features of sensory and motor block, and side effects were recorded. The Chi-square/Fisher's exact test and the independent samples t-test were used for statistical analysis. A statistically significant p-value is one that is less than 0.05. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The onset of sensory block was significantly faster in the fentanyl group (3.46 ± 1.09 min) compared to the dexmedetomidine group (3.96 ± 0.77 min, p = 0.045). However, the duration of sensory block (190.43 ± 8.48 vs. 157.76 ± 16.31 min, p < 0.001) and duration of analgesia (279.43 ± 30.49 vs. 183.03 ± 20.87 min, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the dexmedetomidine group. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in both groups, although dexmedetomidine was associated with greater reductions in heart rate and blood pressure during the early intraoperative period. The incidence of adverse effects was comparable, with no cases of postoperative nausea and vomiting observed. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine demonstrated superior efficacy as an intrathecal adjuvant by significantly prolonging sensory blockade and postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl, albeit with a modest increase in manageable hemodynamic effects. These findings support its preferential use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, where prolonged pain relief and stable intraoperative conditions are desired.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109732
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anesthesia Using Isobaric Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Bhawna Singh, Samrat Arya, Mohd Khalik
Cureus
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anesthesia Using Isobaric Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Bhawna Singh, Samrat Arya, Mohd Khalik
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia is increasingly used as an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of its potential benefits in providing effective intraoperative anesthesia and improved postoperative recovery. The present study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects, block characteristics, and postoperative analgesia effects of isobaric levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine in thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia. Materials and methods: In this prospective comparative study, 60 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups of 30 each. Levobupivacaine was administered intrathecally with fentanyl (25 µg) in one group and levobupivacaine and dexmedetomidine (5 µg) in the other. Hemodynamic parameters, duration of analgesia, features of sensory and motor block, and side effects were recorded. The Chi-square/Fisher's exact test and the independent samples t-test were used for statistical analysis. A statistically significant p-value is one that is less than 0.05. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The onset of sensory block was significantly faster in the fentanyl group (3.46 ± 1.09 min) compared to the dexmedetomidine group (3.96 ± 0.77 min, p = 0.045). However, the duration of sensory block (190.43 ± 8.48 vs. 157.76 ± 16.31 min, p < 0.001) and duration of analgesia (279.43 ± 30.49 vs. 183.03 ± 20.87 min, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the dexmedetomidine group. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in both groups, although dexmedetomidine was associated with greater reductions in heart rate and blood pressure during the early intraoperative period. The incidence of adverse effects was comparable, with no cases of postoperative nausea and vomiting observed. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine demonstrated superior efficacy as an intrathecal adjuvant by significantly prolonging sensory blockade and postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl, albeit with a modest increase in manageable hemodynamic effects. These findings support its preferential use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, where prolonged pain relief and stable intraoperative conditions are desired.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.