Real-world adoption and sequencing of CLDN18.2, PD-L1, and HER2 testing in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

4035 Background: The FDA approval of zolbetuximab for CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEA) in Oct 2024, based on the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW trials, represents an important advance in biomarker-driven therapy. We aimed to describe real-world adoption of CLDN18.2 testing in the US, and CLDN18.2 co-expression with other clinically relevant biomarkers. Methods: Using the US-based, electronic health record-derived deidentified Flatiron Health Research Database, we evaluated biomarker testing patterns among patients diagnosed after 2016 across three periods: pre-SPOTLIGHT publication (2016–2022), post-SPOTLIGHT/pre-FDA approval (Jan 2023–Sep 2024), and post-FDA approval (Oct 2024 onward). We assessed CLDN18.2 testing uptake and co-expression with PD-L1 and HER2. Results: In total, our study included 11,099 patients (7,515 pre-SPOTLIGHT, 2,364 pre-FDA, 1,220 post-FDA). Compared to HER2 testing, 1.1% had CLDN18.2 testing pre-SPOTLIGHT, 21.3% pre-FDA and 39.5% post-FDA. The prevalence of biomarker positivity was as follows: HER2 20.1% (2,617/13,033), PD-L1 25.6% (1,913/7,487), CLDN18.2 42.6% (473/1,109). Among patients tested for all three biomarkers with available result dates, 69.9% underwent upfront comprehensive testing (HER2, PD-L1, CLDN18.2 within one week), while 30.1% had sequential testing, with a median interval of 91 days between tests. Among 1,034 patients tested for all three biomarkers, 13.9% were dual PD-L1/CLDN18.2 positive, and 4.4% were triple-positive. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, CLDN18.2 testing uptake increased following SPOTLIGHT but remained incomplete, and nearly one-third underwent sequential rather than upfront comprehensive biomarker testing, resulting in clinically meaningful delays. These findings highlight the need for improved education and implementation of upfront, comprehensive biomarker testing strategies to optimize treatment sequencing and preserve therapeutic options for patients with GEA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.4035
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world adoption and sequencing of CLDN18.2, PD-L1, and HER2 testing in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Osama Radi, X. Wang, Raghav Sundar, Yifei Zhang et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Real-world adoption and sequencing of CLDN18.2, PD-L1, and HER2 testing in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Osama Radi, X. Wang, Raghav Sundar, Yifei Zhang, Wei Wei
article en

Abstract

4035 Background: The FDA approval of zolbetuximab for CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEA) in Oct 2024, based on the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW trials, represents an important advance in biomarker-driven therapy. We aimed to describe real-world adoption of CLDN18.2 testing in the US, and CLDN18.2 co-expression with other clinically relevant biomarkers. Methods: Using the US-based, electronic health record-derived deidentified Flatiron Health Research Database, we evaluated biomarker testing patterns among patients diagnosed after 2016 across three periods: pre-SPOTLIGHT publication (2016–2022), post-SPOTLIGHT/pre-FDA approval (Jan 2023–Sep 2024), and post-FDA approval (Oct 2024 onward). We assessed CLDN18.2 testing uptake and co-expression with PD-L1 and HER2. Results: In total, our study included 11,099 patients (7,515 pre-SPOTLIGHT, 2,364 pre-FDA, 1,220 post-FDA). Compared to HER2 testing, 1.1% had CLDN18.2 testing pre-SPOTLIGHT, 21.3% pre-FDA and 39.5% post-FDA. The prevalence of biomarker positivity was as follows: HER2 20.1% (2,617/13,033), PD-L1 25.6% (1,913/7,487), CLDN18.2 42.6% (473/1,109). Among patients tested for all three biomarkers with available result dates, 69.9% underwent upfront comprehensive testing (HER2, PD-L1, CLDN18.2 within one week), while 30.1% had sequential testing, with a median interval of 91 days between tests. Among 1,034 patients tested for all three biomarkers, 13.9% were dual PD-L1/CLDN18.2 positive, and 4.4% were triple-positive. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, CLDN18.2 testing uptake increased following SPOTLIGHT but remained incomplete, and nearly one-third underwent sequential rather than upfront comprehensive biomarker testing, resulting in clinically meaningful delays. These findings highlight the need for improved education and implementation of upfront, comprehensive biomarker testing strategies to optimize treatment sequencing and preserve therapeutic options for patients with GEA.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Yale Cancer Center (US), Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.