Development of a Prognostic Model for Patients Aged ≤65 Years With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Existing prognostic models for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were developed using all-age cohorts, and their validity in non-elderly patients remains unclear. We aimed to develop and validate our prognostic model for patients aged ≤65 years with mRCC, including non–clear cell histologies, and to establish a practical risk stratification system. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> We retrospectively analyzed 210 patients with mRCC from multiple Japanese institutions. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Independent prognostic factors were identified using a multivariable Cox regression analysis. A simplified scoring system was constructed to stratify patients into risk groups. Model discrimination was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), with internal validation by bootstrap resampling. Clinical utility was assessed by a decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed based on the identified independent prognostic factors. <h3>Results:</h3> During a median follow-up of 57 months, 77 OS events occurred; median OS was 65.7 months. Histopathological type, liver metastasis, C-reactive protein, serum-corrected calcium, and time to systemic therapy were independently associated with worse OS. Our prognostic model stratified patients into favorable- (n=89), intermediate- (n=76), and poor- (n=45) risk groups, with median OS of 95.1, 37.7, and 9.6 months, respectively (<i>p</i>&lt;0.001). The 5-year C-index was 0.74, exceeding that of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model (0.70). In DCA, our prognostic model showed higher net benefit across threshold of 0.3-0.6, corresponding to an average reduction of 3.26 unnecessary treatment escalations per 100 patients. The nomogram showed time-dependent C-indices of 0.83, 0.84, and 0.87 at 1, 3, and 5 years. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Our prognostic model provides superior discrimination to and higher clinical utility than the IMDC model for predicting OS in non-elderly patients with mRCC, supporting age-specific risk stratification in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anticancer Research
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18198
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Prognostic Model for Patients Aged ≤65 Years With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keita Tamura, Takuhisa Nukaya, Daisuke Motoyama, Yuya Oishi et al.
Anticancer Research
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Development of a Prognostic Model for Patients Aged ≤65 Years With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keita Tamura, Takuhisa Nukaya, Daisuke Motoyama, Yuya Oishi, Seitetsu Sugiyama, KYOHEI WATANABE, SHINYA WATANABE, TERUO INAMOTO, HARUHITO AZUMA, KEIICHIRO MORI, RYOICHI MAENOSONO, KAZUMASA KOMURA, SHINGO TOYODA, YUTO MATSUSHITA, TAKAFUMI YANAGISAWA, KIYOSHI TAKAHARA, JK-FOOT STUDY GROUP, KAZUTOSHI FUJITA, KENSUKE BEKKU, MOTOO ARAKI, HIROMITSU WATANABE
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Existing prognostic models for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were developed using all-age cohorts, and their validity in non-elderly patients remains unclear. We aimed to develop and validate our prognostic model for patients aged ≤65 years with mRCC, including non–clear cell histologies, and to establish a practical risk stratification system. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> We retrospectively analyzed 210 patients with mRCC from multiple Japanese institutions. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Independent prognostic factors were identified using a multivariable Cox regression analysis. A simplified scoring system was constructed to stratify patients into risk groups. Model discrimination was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), with internal validation by bootstrap resampling. Clinical utility was assessed by a decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed based on the identified independent prognostic factors. <h3>Results:</h3> During a median follow-up of 57 months, 77 OS events occurred; median OS was 65.7 months. Histopathological type, liver metastasis, C-reactive protein, serum-corrected calcium, and time to systemic therapy were independently associated with worse OS. Our prognostic model stratified patients into favorable- (n=89), intermediate- (n=76), and poor- (n=45) risk groups, with median OS of 95.1, 37.7, and 9.6 months, respectively (<i>p</i>&lt;0.001). The 5-year C-index was 0.74, exceeding that of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model (0.70). In DCA, our prognostic model showed higher net benefit across threshold of 0.3-0.6, corresponding to an average reduction of 3.26 unnecessary treatment escalations per 100 patients. The nomogram showed time-dependent C-indices of 0.83, 0.84, and 0.87 at 1, 3, and 5 years. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Our prognostic model provides superior discrimination to and higher clinical utility than the IMDC model for predicting OS in non-elderly patients with mRCC, supporting age-specific risk stratification in this population.

Anticancer ResearchVol. 46(6)
Jikei University School of Medicine (JP), Shizuoka University (JP), Fujita Health University (JP), Okayama University (JP), Kawasaki Medical School (JP), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), Shizuoka General Hospital (JP), Shizuoka Medical Center (JP), Fujieda Municipal General Hospital (JP), JA Shizuoka Koseiren ENSHU hospital (JP), Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JP), Kindai University (JP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.