Moral injury in healthcare workers: An intervention to mitigate distress

BackgroundThe psychological distress of individuals working in high-stakes, value-based environments (e.g., hospitals, nursing homes, and community health centers) is receiving growing recognition as moral injury (MI). While MI and other mental health challenges, like PTSD and burnout, have similarities and overlaps in symptoms, identification of these differences is essential, as the distinct needs of MI treatment require professionals to address its unique characteristics. Further, MI creates dual threats to healthcare operations, affecting workforce stability and individual psychological impact for healthcare workers themselves.Research aimThrough the lens of moral distress framework, our research investigates how a reading-based intervention impacts MI symptoms in healthcare employees.Research designThe research design utilized a 5-week plan to track MI symptoms before and after a self-led coping skill development treatment initiative.Participants and research contextIn total, 40 healthcare workers participated in the study. The majority of the participants were recruited from healthcare centers in Georgia and South Carolina, and a range of medical positions were represented including registered nurses, mental health therapists, emergency medical technicians, trauma technicians, obstetricians, and medical assistants.Ethical considerationsThe present study was approved by Valdosta State University's IRB (reference number 04607-2025). All participants remained anonymous.Findings/resultsOut of all participants, 48.7% experienced at least some improvement to their MI scores; 23.1% experienced notable improvements following the intervention.ConclusionsThe present study provides evidence for a reading-based, self-managed intervention having large impacts on healthcare providers with MI. These results suggest that self-directed interventions will not eliminate MI from an entire workforce but can be effective in providing assistance to individuals, especially those who are already exhibiting high levels of MI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261449301
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral injury in healthcare workers: An intervention to mitigate distress

Haley Sherman, Connor Bland, Kristin Kirchner, Pearce Persaud
Nursing Ethics
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Moral injury in healthcare workers: An intervention to mitigate distress

Haley Sherman, Connor Bland, Kristin Kirchner, Pearce Persaud
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe psychological distress of individuals working in high-stakes, value-based environments (e.g., hospitals, nursing homes, and community health centers) is receiving growing recognition as moral injury (MI). While MI and other mental health challenges, like PTSD and burnout, have similarities and overlaps in symptoms, identification of these differences is essential, as the distinct needs of MI treatment require professionals to address its unique characteristics. Further, MI creates dual threats to healthcare operations, affecting workforce stability and individual psychological impact for healthcare workers themselves.Research aimThrough the lens of moral distress framework, our research investigates how a reading-based intervention impacts MI symptoms in healthcare employees.Research designThe research design utilized a 5-week plan to track MI symptoms before and after a self-led coping skill development treatment initiative.Participants and research contextIn total, 40 healthcare workers participated in the study. The majority of the participants were recruited from healthcare centers in Georgia and South Carolina, and a range of medical positions were represented including registered nurses, mental health therapists, emergency medical technicians, trauma technicians, obstetricians, and medical assistants.Ethical considerationsThe present study was approved by Valdosta State University's IRB (reference number 04607-2025). All participants remained anonymous.Findings/resultsOut of all participants, 48.7% experienced at least some improvement to their MI scores; 23.1% experienced notable improvements following the intervention.ConclusionsThe present study provides evidence for a reading-based, self-managed intervention having large impacts on healthcare providers with MI. These results suggest that self-directed interventions will not eliminate MI from an entire workforce but can be effective in providing assistance to individuals, especially those who are already exhibiting high levels of MI.

Nursing Ethics
Valdosta State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.