Global sex-based disparities in pancreatic cancer clinical trial enrollment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

1654 Background: Sex-based disparities in oncology trial enrollment are well recognized, yet their magnitude and consistency in pancreatic cancer clinical trials remain poorly-defined. We conducted a global systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify women’s representation in pancreatic cancer trials relative to disease incidence. Methods: We identified phase I–III randomized and prospective interventional pancreatic cancer trials published through November 2025 in the top 25 general medicine, oncology, and gastroenterology journals. Women’s enrollment was compared with sex-specific pancreatic cancer incidence from Global Burden of Disease estimates. Enrollment disparity difference (EDD) was calculated as the proportion of women enrolled minus the proportion of women in the underlying disease population. Random-effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and temporal meta-regression were performed. Results: Among 191 eligible trials including 37,688 participants, 16,393 (43.5%) were women. Overall, women were significantly under-enrolled, with a pooled EDD of −0.050 (95% CI, −0.058 to −0.042). Under-enrollment was observed across all geographic regions, with the largest disparity in European trials (EDD −0.069; 95% CI, −0.080 to −0.058). Significant disparities were present across all trial phases except combined phase I/II studies and were most pronounced in trials enrolling fewer than 50 participants (EDD −0.081; 95% CI, −0.105 to −0.057). Women remained under-enrolled across chemotherapy, immunotherapy/biologic, vaccine, and multimodal trials, while no significant disparity was observed in radiotherapy studies. Trials with women in leadership roles demonstrated slightly attenuated but persistent under-enrollment (EDD −0.046 vs −0.052). Temporal analyses showed narrowing of disparities between 2016 and 2020, followed by worsening under-enrollment from 2021 to 2025 (EDD −0.033). Sensitivity analyses limited to chemotherapy, immunotherapy/biologic, and phase III trials confirmed consistent patterns of under-representation. Conclusions: Women are persistently under-enrolled in pancreatic cancer clinical trials worldwide, with disparities evident across regions, trial phases, and treatment modalities. Recent reversals in progress highlight the need for durable, equity-focused trial design and enrollment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1654
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global sex-based disparities in pancreatic cancer clinical trial enrollment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Ahmad Nadeem, Abdul Rafeh Awan, Mohammed Quazi, Amir H. Sohail
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Global sex-based disparities in pancreatic cancer clinical trial enrollment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Ahmad Nadeem, Abdul Rafeh Awan, Mohammed Quazi, Amir H. Sohail
article en

Abstract

1654 Background: Sex-based disparities in oncology trial enrollment are well recognized, yet their magnitude and consistency in pancreatic cancer clinical trials remain poorly-defined. We conducted a global systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify women’s representation in pancreatic cancer trials relative to disease incidence. Methods: We identified phase I–III randomized and prospective interventional pancreatic cancer trials published through November 2025 in the top 25 general medicine, oncology, and gastroenterology journals. Women’s enrollment was compared with sex-specific pancreatic cancer incidence from Global Burden of Disease estimates. Enrollment disparity difference (EDD) was calculated as the proportion of women enrolled minus the proportion of women in the underlying disease population. Random-effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and temporal meta-regression were performed. Results: Among 191 eligible trials including 37,688 participants, 16,393 (43.5%) were women. Overall, women were significantly under-enrolled, with a pooled EDD of −0.050 (95% CI, −0.058 to −0.042). Under-enrollment was observed across all geographic regions, with the largest disparity in European trials (EDD −0.069; 95% CI, −0.080 to −0.058). Significant disparities were present across all trial phases except combined phase I/II studies and were most pronounced in trials enrolling fewer than 50 participants (EDD −0.081; 95% CI, −0.105 to −0.057). Women remained under-enrolled across chemotherapy, immunotherapy/biologic, vaccine, and multimodal trials, while no significant disparity was observed in radiotherapy studies. Trials with women in leadership roles demonstrated slightly attenuated but persistent under-enrollment (EDD −0.046 vs −0.052). Temporal analyses showed narrowing of disparities between 2016 and 2020, followed by worsening under-enrollment from 2021 to 2025 (EDD −0.033). Sensitivity analyses limited to chemotherapy, immunotherapy/biologic, and phase III trials confirmed consistent patterns of under-representation. Conclusions: Women are persistently under-enrolled in pancreatic cancer clinical trials worldwide, with disparities evident across regions, trial phases, and treatment modalities. Recent reversals in progress highlight the need for durable, equity-focused trial design and enrollment strategies.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
West Virginia University (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Nishtar Medical College and Hospital (PK), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.