Addition of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET to MRI to avoid unnecessary biopsy in men on active surveillance: Final results from a phase II diagnostic trial (PROMPT).

5125 Background: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is used in active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PC) but has limited specificity. This prospective trial evaluated whether combining 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET with mpMRI improves the detection of clinically significant PC (csPC) in patients on AS and reduces unnecessary biopsies prompted by false-positive mpMRI. Methods: In this IRB-approved, single-arm Phase II study, 91 patients on AS underwent PSMA PET and mpMRI on a dedicated PET/MRI scanner followed by systematic and targeted biopsies. PET and mpMRI were interpreted independently. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI versus the combined PSMA PET/MRI for csPC. Results: Among 246 targeted lesions, the area under the curve (AUC) for combined PSMA PET/MRI was (0.77) compared to mpMRI alone (0.70) (p=0.2). PSMA PET/MRI showed improved specificity (64.6% vs. 27.5%) with a comparable negative predictive value (89.1% vs. 89.7%). Of 57 csPC lesions, 6 (10.5%) were uniquely identified by the combination. Half of the biopsies for false-positive mpMRI or PET lesions (122/246; 50%) encompassing 17/91 (19%) of patients could have been avoided with combined imaging. Management changed in 9% of patients based on PET/MRI. Conclusions: In this first-in-field trial the addition of PSMA PET to mpMRI with dedicated PET/MRI imaging enhances sensitivity in detecting csPC and may reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies in AS patients. Incorporating PSMA PET/MRI into clinical practice could refine surveillance protocols and support biopsy omission in select men with negative imaging. The single health-system nature of the trial may limit the generalizability of our findings. Diagnostic accuracy of the mpMRI, PSMA PET/MRI, and for the combination, assessed using the “AND” operator. a Parameter MRI, PIRADS≥3 PSMA-PET, Likert≥3 MRI, PIRADS≥4 PSMA-PET, Likert≥4 MRI PIRADS≥3 ANDPET Likert≥3 MRI PIRADS≥3 ANDPET Likert≥4 MRI PIRADS≥4 ANDPET Likert≥3 MRI PIRADS≥4 ANDPET Likert≥4 Accuracy 41.9% 48.0% 63.8% 63.8% 66.7% 72.8% 78.5% 79.3% Sensitivity 89.5% 84.2% 71.9% 73.7% 73.7% 64.9% 63.2% 57.9% Specificity 27.5% 37.0% 61.4% 60.8% 64.6% 75.1% 83.1% 85.7% PPV 27.1% 28.7% 36.0% 36.2% 38.5% 44.0% 52.9% 55.0% NPV 89.7% 88.6% 87.9% 88.5% 89.1% 87.7% 88.2% 87.1% Number of lesions (% of 257) 188 (76) 167 (68) 114 (46) 116 (47) 109 (44) 84 (34) 68 (28) 60 (24) a The detection of clinically significant cancer was considered on per-lesion analysis. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PET = positron emission tomography; PI-RADS = Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen. PPV= positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5125
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addition of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET to MRI to avoid unnecessary biopsy in men on active surveillance: Final results from a phase II diagnostic trial (PROMPT).

David F. Jarrard, Steve Y. Cho, Jens Eickhoff, Jenna A. Cava et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Addition of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET to MRI to avoid unnecessary biopsy in men on active surveillance: Final results from a phase II diagnostic trial (PROMPT).

David F. Jarrard, Steve Y. Cho, Jens Eickhoff, Jenna A. Cava, Wei Huang, Changhee Lee, Marcelo Bigarella, Abigail Wiedmer, Edward Lawrence, Shane Wells
article en

Abstract

5125 Background: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is used in active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PC) but has limited specificity. This prospective trial evaluated whether combining 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET with mpMRI improves the detection of clinically significant PC (csPC) in patients on AS and reduces unnecessary biopsies prompted by false-positive mpMRI. Methods: In this IRB-approved, single-arm Phase II study, 91 patients on AS underwent PSMA PET and mpMRI on a dedicated PET/MRI scanner followed by systematic and targeted biopsies. PET and mpMRI were interpreted independently. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI versus the combined PSMA PET/MRI for csPC. Results: Among 246 targeted lesions, the area under the curve (AUC) for combined PSMA PET/MRI was (0.77) compared to mpMRI alone (0.70) (p=0.2). PSMA PET/MRI showed improved specificity (64.6% vs. 27.5%) with a comparable negative predictive value (89.1% vs. 89.7%). Of 57 csPC lesions, 6 (10.5%) were uniquely identified by the combination. Half of the biopsies for false-positive mpMRI or PET lesions (122/246; 50%) encompassing 17/91 (19%) of patients could have been avoided with combined imaging. Management changed in 9% of patients based on PET/MRI. Conclusions: In this first-in-field trial the addition of PSMA PET to mpMRI with dedicated PET/MRI imaging enhances sensitivity in detecting csPC and may reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies in AS patients. Incorporating PSMA PET/MRI into clinical practice could refine surveillance protocols and support biopsy omission in select men with negative imaging. The single health-system nature of the trial may limit the generalizability of our findings. Diagnostic accuracy of the mpMRI, PSMA PET/MRI, and for the combination, assessed using the “AND” operator. a Parameter MRI, PIRADS≥3 PSMA-PET, Likert≥3 MRI, PIRADS≥4 PSMA-PET, Likert≥4 MRI PIRADS≥3 ANDPET Likert≥3 MRI PIRADS≥3 ANDPET Likert≥4 MRI PIRADS≥4 ANDPET Likert≥3 MRI PIRADS≥4 ANDPET Likert≥4 Accuracy 41.9% 48.0% 63.8% 63.8% 66.7% 72.8% 78.5% 79.3% Sensitivity 89.5% 84.2% 71.9% 73.7% 73.7% 64.9% 63.2% 57.9% Specificity 27.5% 37.0% 61.4% 60.8% 64.6% 75.1% 83.1% 85.7% PPV 27.1% 28.7% 36.0% 36.2% 38.5% 44.0% 52.9% 55.0% NPV 89.7% 88.6% 87.9% 88.5% 89.1% 87.7% 88.2% 87.1% Number of lesions (% of 257) 188 (76) 167 (68) 114 (46) 116 (47) 109 (44) 84 (34) 68 (28) 60 (24) a The detection of clinically significant cancer was considered on per-lesion analysis. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PET = positron emission tomography; PI-RADS = Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen. PPV= positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.