WALTER HALLSTEIN AND EUROPEAN LEGAL INTEGRATION

This article tries to reconstruct the figure of Walter Hallstein, as an emblematic representative (practical and theoretical) of the fundamental directions taken, over the decades, by the development of European integration. Thus, we attempt to analyze some essential elements of his theoretical-legal conception, to emphasize the critical links with the ideological dimension of the Union’s structure. First, we provide a brief comparison with other theorists of European integration. Second, we trace, specifically, some fundamental thematic elements that emerge from internal reflection on Hallstein’s writings. Third, we highlight the similarities with the theoretical positions of that complex of doctrines attributable to the so-called German ‘ordoliberalism’. Considering these analytical passages, we try to argue the profound connection of Hallstein’s perspective with some founding paradigms of the architectural structure of the EU, which see the centrality of law as one of their key elements. The perspective of the German politician and jurist sees the legal dimension as the indefectible requirement for a solid and structured European integration (even if this does not exclude the importance of politics and economics). The centrality of law is what reveals the relevance of Hallstein’s positions to understand, on a genealogical level, and from a philosophical-political profile, a good part of the historical and institutional developments of the EU.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
East-West Studies
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82533/ews.2025.15.953
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WALTER HALLSTEIN AND EUROPEAN LEGAL INTEGRATION

Jacopo Volpi Volpi
East-West Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
article

WALTER HALLSTEIN AND EUROPEAN LEGAL INTEGRATION

Jacopo Volpi Volpi
article en

Abstract

This article tries to reconstruct the figure of Walter Hallstein, as an emblematic representative (practical and theoretical) of the fundamental directions taken, over the decades, by the development of European integration. Thus, we attempt to analyze some essential elements of his theoretical-legal conception, to emphasize the critical links with the ideological dimension of the Union’s structure. First, we provide a brief comparison with other theorists of European integration. Second, we trace, specifically, some fundamental thematic elements that emerge from internal reflection on Hallstein’s writings. Third, we highlight the similarities with the theoretical positions of that complex of doctrines attributable to the so-called German ‘ordoliberalism’. Considering these analytical passages, we try to argue the profound connection of Hallstein’s perspective with some founding paradigms of the architectural structure of the EU, which see the centrality of law as one of their key elements. The perspective of the German politician and jurist sees the legal dimension as the indefectible requirement for a solid and structured European integration (even if this does not exclude the importance of politics and economics). The centrality of law is what reveals the relevance of Hallstein’s positions to understand, on a genealogical level, and from a philosophical-political profile, a good part of the historical and institutional developments of the EU.

East-West Studies
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.