Cancer outcome among adolescents in Canada.

10024 Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer, commonly defined as patients aged 15–39 years at diagnosis, experience higher morbidity and mortality compared with other age groups. In this study, we compared outcomes of adolescents with newly diagnosed cancer treated at Canadian pediatric oncology centers with those of younger children. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the population-based CYP-C database, including children aged 1–18 years with newly diagnosed cancer across Canada (2015–2020). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between adolescents (15–18 years) and younger children (1 to <15 years) across cancer subtypes using Kaplan–Meier analyses and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of the 6,794 patients, adolescents aged 15–18 years comprised 16% (n=1,075) of the cohort. Median age at diagnosis was 16 years (IQR: 15.7–17.2), and among those with solid tumors, 26% (n=150) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. The most frequent adolescent cancers were Hodgkin lymphoma (20%), gliomas and other glioneuronal tumors (12%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (11%), osteosarcoma (6%), thyroid carcinoma (6%), malignant extracranial germ cell tumors (5%), and Ewing sarcoma (4%). Adolescents with leukemia had comparable 5-year EFS (71% vs. 79%; p=0.06) and OS (83% vs. 89%; p=0.07) to younger children, as did those with non-central nervous system (CNS) solid tumors for EFS (65% vs. 65%; p=0.55) and OS (74% vs. 75%; p=0.23). Among patients with sarcomas, adolescents had similar 5-year EFS (50.7% vs. 52.0%, p=0.55) and OS (55.6 vs. 59.7%, p=0.14) to younger children. Adolescents with CNS tumors had superior EFS (83% vs. 66%; p=0.005) and OS (89% vs. 73%; p=0.006), primarily driven by ependymoma and choroid plexus tumors, and other gliomas/glioneuronal tumors excluding pilocytic astrocytoma. Conclusions: Although AYA with cancer are often reported to have poorer outcomes, adolescents aged 15–18 years treated exclusively in Canadian pediatric oncology centers did not have inferior outcomes to younger children, underscoring the effectiveness of pediatric treatment approaches. 5-year EFS and 5-year OS of adolescents (≥15 years-old) vs. younger children (1 to < 15 years old) across major cancer categories. - Adolescents 5-year EFS (%) [95% CI] Younger children 5-year EFS (%) [95% CI] p-value Adolescents 5-year OS (%) [95% CI] Younger children 5-year OS (%) [95% CI] p-value All cancers 76.4 [72.8-79.9] 72.6 [70.8-74.3] 0.12 84.7 [81.4-87.4] 81.1 [79.6-82.7] 0.13 Leukemias 71.2 [58.7-80.5] 79.0 [75.8-81.9] 0.06 83.2 [73.3-89.7] 88.6 [86.2-90.6] 0.07 Lymphomas 88.5 [82.6-92.5] 87.3 [82.6-90.7] 0.63 96.2 [91.9-98.3] 95.5 [92.7-97.3] 0.50 Non-CNS solid tumors 65.4 [58.6-71.3] 65.2 [61.8-68.3] 0.55 73.5 [66.7-79.0] 74.8 [71.5-77.9] 0.23 CNS tumors 83.1 [74.2-89.1] 66.3 [62.5-69.8] 0.005 89.1 [82.0-93.5] 72.5 [68.8-75.9] 0.006

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.10024
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer outcome among adolescents in Canada.

Sapna Oberoi, Monia Marzouki, Hallie Coltin, Tony H. Truong et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Cancer outcome among adolescents in Canada.

Sapna Oberoi, Monia Marzouki, Hallie Coltin, Tony H. Truong, Laura Wheaton, Samuel Sassine, Lesleigh S. Abbott, Maria Kondyli, Paul James Gibson, Marie‐Claude Pelland‐Marcotte, Ketan Kulkarni, Donna Johnston, Thai Hoa Tran, Nida Usmani, Josée Brossard, Nicolas Prud'homme, Catherine Vézina, Sylvia Shew-Wai Cheng, Lillian Sung, Sarah McKillop
article en

Abstract

10024 Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer, commonly defined as patients aged 15–39 years at diagnosis, experience higher morbidity and mortality compared with other age groups. In this study, we compared outcomes of adolescents with newly diagnosed cancer treated at Canadian pediatric oncology centers with those of younger children. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the population-based CYP-C database, including children aged 1–18 years with newly diagnosed cancer across Canada (2015–2020). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between adolescents (15–18 years) and younger children (1 to <15 years) across cancer subtypes using Kaplan–Meier analyses and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of the 6,794 patients, adolescents aged 15–18 years comprised 16% (n=1,075) of the cohort. Median age at diagnosis was 16 years (IQR: 15.7–17.2), and among those with solid tumors, 26% (n=150) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. The most frequent adolescent cancers were Hodgkin lymphoma (20%), gliomas and other glioneuronal tumors (12%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (11%), osteosarcoma (6%), thyroid carcinoma (6%), malignant extracranial germ cell tumors (5%), and Ewing sarcoma (4%). Adolescents with leukemia had comparable 5-year EFS (71% vs. 79%; p=0.06) and OS (83% vs. 89%; p=0.07) to younger children, as did those with non-central nervous system (CNS) solid tumors for EFS (65% vs. 65%; p=0.55) and OS (74% vs. 75%; p=0.23). Among patients with sarcomas, adolescents had similar 5-year EFS (50.7% vs. 52.0%, p=0.55) and OS (55.6 vs. 59.7%, p=0.14) to younger children. Adolescents with CNS tumors had superior EFS (83% vs. 66%; p=0.005) and OS (89% vs. 73%; p=0.006), primarily driven by ependymoma and choroid plexus tumors, and other gliomas/glioneuronal tumors excluding pilocytic astrocytoma. Conclusions: Although AYA with cancer are often reported to have poorer outcomes, adolescents aged 15–18 years treated exclusively in Canadian pediatric oncology centers did not have inferior outcomes to younger children, underscoring the effectiveness of pediatric treatment approaches. 5-year EFS and 5-year OS of adolescents (≥15 years-old) vs. younger children (1 to < 15 years old) across major cancer categories. - Adolescents 5-year EFS (%) [95% CI] Younger children 5-year EFS (%) [95% CI] p-value Adolescents 5-year OS (%) [95% CI] Younger children 5-year OS (%) [95% CI] p-value All cancers 76.4 [72.8-79.9] 72.6 [70.8-74.3] 0.12 84.7 [81.4-87.4] 81.1 [79.6-82.7] 0.13 Leukemias 71.2 [58.7-80.5] 79.0 [75.8-81.9] 0.06 83.2 [73.3-89.7] 88.6 [86.2-90.6] 0.07 Lymphomas 88.5 [82.6-92.5] 87.3 [82.6-90.7] 0.63 96.2 [91.9-98.3] 95.5 [92.7-97.3] 0.50 Non-CNS solid tumors 65.4 [58.6-71.3] 65.2 [61.8-68.3] 0.55 73.5 [66.7-79.0] 74.8 [71.5-77.9] 0.23 CNS tumors 83.1 [74.2-89.1] 66.3 [62.5-69.8] 0.005 89.1 [82.0-93.5] 72.5 [68.8-75.9] 0.006

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Dalhousie University (CA), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA), Montreal Children's Hospital (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CA), McMaster Children's Hospital (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA), CancerCare Manitoba (CA), Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus (CA), BC Children's Hospital (CA), Kingston Health Sciences Centre (CA), Stollery Children's Hospital (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.