Comparative Analysis of Feature Extraction Methods for ECG Arrhythmia Classification Using Ensemble Learning

Electrocardiogram (ECG) arrhythmia classification remains critical for automated cardiac diagnosis, yet feature extraction methods are frequently adopted without systematic comparative evaluation. This study presents a controlled comparative analysis of four signal processing techniques—Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), Hilbert–Huang Transform (HHT), and Synchrosqueezing Wavelet Transform (SSWT)—for ECG feature extraction. Using the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database with ANSI/AAMI EC57:1998 standard mapping, we trained Cascade Forest classifiers on each feature set under identical preprocessing and SMOTE-based class balancing conditions to ensure a fair comparison. DWT features achieved superior performance (accuracy: 98.79%, macro-F1: 92.93%, precision: 94.39%) compared to MFCC (88.30% macro-F1), SSWT (84.54% macro-F1), and HHT (83.59% macro-F1), particularly for clinically challenging minority arrhythmia classes. However, DWT’s performance advantage incurred substantial computational cost (10,050 s), while MFCC provided competitive results with a 62% lower computational burden. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for feature extraction method selection in interpretable ECG classification systems, demonstrating critical performance-efficiency trade-offs relevant to clinical deployment contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioMedInformatics
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics6030033
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Feature Extraction Methods for ECG Arrhythmia Classification Using Ensemble Learning

Mahmoud Elbattah, Victor Adeleye
BioMedInformatics
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Comparative Analysis of Feature Extraction Methods for ECG Arrhythmia Classification Using Ensemble Learning

Mahmoud Elbattah, Victor Adeleye
article en

Abstract

Electrocardiogram (ECG) arrhythmia classification remains critical for automated cardiac diagnosis, yet feature extraction methods are frequently adopted without systematic comparative evaluation. This study presents a controlled comparative analysis of four signal processing techniques—Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), Hilbert–Huang Transform (HHT), and Synchrosqueezing Wavelet Transform (SSWT)—for ECG feature extraction. Using the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database with ANSI/AAMI EC57:1998 standard mapping, we trained Cascade Forest classifiers on each feature set under identical preprocessing and SMOTE-based class balancing conditions to ensure a fair comparison. DWT features achieved superior performance (accuracy: 98.79%, macro-F1: 92.93%, precision: 94.39%) compared to MFCC (88.30% macro-F1), SSWT (84.54% macro-F1), and HHT (83.59% macro-F1), particularly for clinically challenging minority arrhythmia classes. However, DWT’s performance advantage incurred substantial computational cost (10,050 s), while MFCC provided competitive results with a 62% lower computational burden. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for feature extraction method selection in interpretable ECG classification systems, demonstrating critical performance-efficiency trade-offs relevant to clinical deployment contexts.

BioMedInformaticsVol. 6(3)
University of East London (GB), University of the West of England (GB), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.