The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Transsphenoidal Surgical Approaches to the Sellar and Parasellar Area—A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Transsphenoidal surgery has become the gold standard for the treatment of sellar and parasellar lesions, but it remains associated with significant anatomical challenges and the risk of intraoperative complications. The limitations of conventional imaging in depicting the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the skull base have led to a growing interest in virtual (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies, which offer enhanced spatial visualization, preoperative simulation, and image-guided intraoperative navigation. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current evidence on the role of virtual and augmented reality in transsphenoidal surgical interventions, with a focus on their impact on preoperative planning, intraoperative orientation, surgical outcomes, and neurosurgical training. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for the period 2015–2025. MeSH terms and free-text keywords related to transsphenoidal surgery, sphenoid sinus anatomy, and VR/AR technologies were combined using Boolean operators. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 for RCTs; methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies and AMSTAR 2 for systematic reviews. Clinical, morphometric, and experimental studies evaluating VR/AR applications were included. Data were extracted using a standardized protocol and synthesized through qualitative analysis, with subgroup analysis by technology type (VR vs. AR) and clinical application domain. Results: A total of 218 publications were identified, of which 52 met the inclusion criteria (clinical studies n = 12, simulation and technology studies n = 30, morphological studies n = 10). VR-based three-dimensional reconstructions were consistently associated with improved preoperative spatial orientation and anatomical landmark recognition. AR systems demonstrated a meaningful contribution to intraoperative navigation, with reported reductions in time to target and improved visualization of critical neurovascular structures. VR platforms showed high effectiveness in surgical training, with shorter learning curves and improved technical performance. However, the majority of included studies were small observational cohorts, simulation studies, or expert overviews, with substantial heterogeneity in methodology, technology platforms, and outcome measures, precluding quantitative meta-analysis. Conclusions: Virtual and augmented reality represent clinically promising adjuncts to transsphenoidal surgery, with demonstrated benefits in preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and surgical training. These conclusions should be interpreted in the context of a predominantly early-phase and heterogeneous evidence base. Standardized protocols, larger prospective studies, and randomized trials are needed before the integration of VR/AR with navigation systems and artificial intelligence can be established as a routine component of personalized transsphenoidal surgery.