Dexamethasone reduction or omission with NEPA and olanzapine for HEC: A phase III trial.

12000 Background: Prolonged dexamethasone (DEX) in antiemetic regimens for highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) may impair immunotherapy efficacy. We evaluated if DEX can be reduced or omitted when combined with NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) and olanzapine without compromising control. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase III non-inferiority trial, adults receiving HEC were randomized 1:1:1 to: Standard Regimen (NEPA day1, olanzapine days1-4, DEX 12mg day1/8mg days2-4); DEX-sparing Regimen (same, DEX 6mg day1 only); or DEX-free Regimen (same, no DEX). The primary endpoint was overall complete response (CR: no emesis/no rescue) 0-120h. A hierarchical testing sequence (DEX-sparing vs Standard, then DEX-free vs Standard) with a -12% non-inferiority margin controlled type I error (one-sided α=0.025). Results: Among 644 randomized patients (median age 54.9 years; 66.9% female), the overall CR rates were 72.4% for Standard, 72.2% for DEX-sparing (rate difference [RD] -0.19%, 95% CI -8.77 to 8.38; P for non-inferiority = 0.004), and 70.1% for DEX-free (RD -2.24%, 95% CI -10.81 to 6.38; P for non-inferiority = 0.013). Both experimental regimens met the non-inferiority criterion. Acute-phase (0-24 h) CR rates were 81.5%, 82.6%, and 80.8% (intergroup comparison, P>0.05), and delayed-phase (24-120 h) CR rates were 77.1%, 77.6%, and 73.9% ((P>0.05), respectively, with no significant differences. For complete nausea control, the DEX-free regimen was inferior beyond 24 hours, whereas the DEX-sparing regimen remained comparable to Standard throughout. Steroid-related adverse events, such as insomnia, were primarily reported in the Standard regimen group. Conclusions: NEPA plus olanzapine with single-day low-dose or no DEX is non-inferior to standard 4-day DEX for CINV prevention in HEC, supporting steroid-sparing strategies relevant for chemo-immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT06331520 . Baseline patient characteristics and chemotherapy regimen. Total(N=644) Standard Regimen(N=217) DEX-sparing Regimen(N=213) DEX-free Regimen(N=214) Age, years 54.9 ±12.0 54.2 ±11.7 55.2±12.0 55.3 ±12.2 Male 219 (34.0) 73 (33.6) 74 (34.7) 72 (33.6) Female 425 (66.0) 144 (66.4) 139 (65.2) 142 (66.4) Breast cancer 280 (43.5) 101 (46.5) 92 (43.2) 87 (40.6) Lung cancer 141 (21.9) 45 (20.7) 50 (23.5) 46 (21.5) AC regimen 148 (23.0) 57 (26.3) 52 (24.4) 39 (18.2) Platinum-based regimen 472 (73.3) 153 (70.5) 152 (71.4) 167 (78.0)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.12000
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dexamethasone reduction or omission with NEPA and olanzapine for HEC: A phase III trial.

L Y Zhang, X. Zhuang, Chen Yong, Y Liu et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Dexamethasone reduction or omission with NEPA and olanzapine for HEC: A phase III trial.

L Y Zhang, X. Zhuang, Chen Yong, Y Liu, Jianhua Zhao, Junhua Zhang, Weifei Fan, Yanchun Meng, Yu Mao, Yiqun Du, Shaodong Tian, Jinsong Liu, Zikang Li, Xiaojun Liu, Ling Yang, Weng Jie, Fei Yan, Hao Wu, Shencun Fang, Qin Zhou
article en

Abstract

12000 Background: Prolonged dexamethasone (DEX) in antiemetic regimens for highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) may impair immunotherapy efficacy. We evaluated if DEX can be reduced or omitted when combined with NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) and olanzapine without compromising control. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase III non-inferiority trial, adults receiving HEC were randomized 1:1:1 to: Standard Regimen (NEPA day1, olanzapine days1-4, DEX 12mg day1/8mg days2-4); DEX-sparing Regimen (same, DEX 6mg day1 only); or DEX-free Regimen (same, no DEX). The primary endpoint was overall complete response (CR: no emesis/no rescue) 0-120h. A hierarchical testing sequence (DEX-sparing vs Standard, then DEX-free vs Standard) with a -12% non-inferiority margin controlled type I error (one-sided α=0.025). Results: Among 644 randomized patients (median age 54.9 years; 66.9% female), the overall CR rates were 72.4% for Standard, 72.2% for DEX-sparing (rate difference [RD] -0.19%, 95% CI -8.77 to 8.38; P for non-inferiority = 0.004), and 70.1% for DEX-free (RD -2.24%, 95% CI -10.81 to 6.38; P for non-inferiority = 0.013). Both experimental regimens met the non-inferiority criterion. Acute-phase (0-24 h) CR rates were 81.5%, 82.6%, and 80.8% (intergroup comparison, P>0.05), and delayed-phase (24-120 h) CR rates were 77.1%, 77.6%, and 73.9% ((P>0.05), respectively, with no significant differences. For complete nausea control, the DEX-free regimen was inferior beyond 24 hours, whereas the DEX-sparing regimen remained comparable to Standard throughout. Steroid-related adverse events, such as insomnia, were primarily reported in the Standard regimen group. Conclusions: NEPA plus olanzapine with single-day low-dose or no DEX is non-inferior to standard 4-day DEX for CINV prevention in HEC, supporting steroid-sparing strategies relevant for chemo-immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT06331520 . Baseline patient characteristics and chemotherapy regimen. Total(N=644) Standard Regimen(N=217) DEX-sparing Regimen(N=213) DEX-free Regimen(N=214) Age, years 54.9 ±12.0 54.2 ±11.7 55.2±12.0 55.3 ±12.2 Male 219 (34.0) 73 (33.6) 74 (34.7) 72 (33.6) Female 425 (66.0) 144 (66.4) 139 (65.2) 142 (66.4) Breast cancer 280 (43.5) 101 (46.5) 92 (43.2) 87 (40.6) Lung cancer 141 (21.9) 45 (20.7) 50 (23.5) 46 (21.5) AC regimen 148 (23.0) 57 (26.3) 52 (24.4) 39 (18.2) Platinum-based regimen 472 (73.3) 153 (70.5) 152 (71.4) 167 (78.0)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Jiangsu University (CN), Huaihua University (CN), Yichun University (CN), Quzhou City People's Hospital (CN), Ya'an Polytechnic College (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Jingdezhen University (CN), Yan'an University (CN), The First People's Hospital of Changzhou (CN), Xinyu University (CN), Nanjing Brain Hospital (CN), First People's Hospital of Kunshan (CN), Jintan People's Hospital (CN), Yueyang Hospital (CN), Liuyang City Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN), Qujiang People's Hospital (CN), The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou (CN), Loudi Central Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.