Intracranial, Intra-, and Epidural Pressure Changes During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To characterize and compare intracranial, intradural (cervical, thoracic, lumbar), and lumbar epidural pressure changes during transforaminal and interlaminar endoscopic lumbar procedures under gravity and pump irrigation, with and without simulated outflow occlusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: High-pressure irrigation improves visualization and hemostasis during endoscopic lumbar discectomy but may increase spinal canal and intracranial pressures and contribute to neurologic complications if not well controlled. METHODS: Three fresh-frozen human cadavers were instrumented with pressure probes in the lumbar epidural space (L3-4), intradural space at C5-6, T8-9, and L3-4, and intracranially. At L3-4, transforaminal and interlaminar uniportal approaches were performed using gravity irrigation (50, 100, 130 cmH2O) and two pump systems (30-120 mmHg; arthroscopy pump and spine-certified pump). Each setting was tested with open outflow and with temporary outflow occlusion by blocking the working channel. Pressure readings were recorded as relative increases (Delta mmHg) from baseline. RESULTS: Without occlusion, the interlaminar approach produced higher lumbar epidural pressure increases than the transforaminal approach across all irrigation modalities (up to 10 mmHg). Differences at intradural levels and intracranially were small (<5 mmHg). With outflow occlusion, the pressure differential narrowed or reversed, with transforaminal access producing higher lumbar epidural and intradural pressures at higher pump settings. Intracranial pressure differences remained modest, with only small increases under occlusion at higher pump settings. CONCLUSIONS: Irrigation generates compartment- and approach-specific pressure responses. Interlaminar access shows higher baseline lumbar epidural pressure, whereas transforaminal access is more susceptible to pressure surges during occlusion. Even small intracranial pressure increases may be clinically important in susceptible patients; careful irrigation pressure control and avoidance of prolonged outflow occlusion are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000005758
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intracranial, Intra-, and Epidural Pressure Changes During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

J. M. Spirig, Najmeh Kheram, Vincent Hagel, Alexandra Stauffer et al.
Spine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Intracranial, Intra-, and Epidural Pressure Changes During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

J. M. Spirig, Najmeh Kheram, Vincent Hagel, Alexandra Stauffer, Carl M. Zipser, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Jonas Widmer, Jana F. Schader, Mazda Farshad
article en

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To characterize and compare intracranial, intradural (cervical, thoracic, lumbar), and lumbar epidural pressure changes during transforaminal and interlaminar endoscopic lumbar procedures under gravity and pump irrigation, with and without simulated outflow occlusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: High-pressure irrigation improves visualization and hemostasis during endoscopic lumbar discectomy but may increase spinal canal and intracranial pressures and contribute to neurologic complications if not well controlled. METHODS: Three fresh-frozen human cadavers were instrumented with pressure probes in the lumbar epidural space (L3-4), intradural space at C5-6, T8-9, and L3-4, and intracranially. At L3-4, transforaminal and interlaminar uniportal approaches were performed using gravity irrigation (50, 100, 130 cmH2O) and two pump systems (30-120 mmHg; arthroscopy pump and spine-certified pump). Each setting was tested with open outflow and with temporary outflow occlusion by blocking the working channel. Pressure readings were recorded as relative increases (Delta mmHg) from baseline. RESULTS: Without occlusion, the interlaminar approach produced higher lumbar epidural pressure increases than the transforaminal approach across all irrigation modalities (up to 10 mmHg). Differences at intradural levels and intracranially were small (<5 mmHg). With outflow occlusion, the pressure differential narrowed or reversed, with transforaminal access producing higher lumbar epidural and intradural pressures at higher pump settings. Intracranial pressure differences remained modest, with only small increases under occlusion at higher pump settings. CONCLUSIONS: Irrigation generates compartment- and approach-specific pressure responses. Interlaminar access shows higher baseline lumbar epidural pressure, whereas transforaminal access is more susceptible to pressure surges during occlusion. Even small intracranial pressure increases may be clinically important in susceptible patients; careful irrigation pressure control and avoidance of prolonged outflow occlusion are recommended.

Spine
University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.