Prediction of cancer-associated thrombosis by machine learning: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study

BACKGROUND: Improved risk prediction of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains an unmet clinical need. We aimed to apply machine learning for the prediction of cancer-associated VTE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (Vienna-CATS), a prospective cohort study that included patients with cancer from 2003-2019, were used. Patient characteristics and laboratory measurements (including various routine and experimental laboratory assays) were used to train and validate six classification models for VTE prediction. Monte Carlo cross-validation was conducted, with 80% of the samples randomly assigned to the training set and 20% to the test set. Preprocessing algorithms fitted on the training data were applied to the test data to avoid data leakage. Discrimination and input parameter influence were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 2193 patients (46.6% women) with a median age of 62 (interquartile range 52-68) years were included. The most common tumor types were lung (18.1%), brain (15.3%), and breast cancer (15.1%). Within 6 months and 2 years, 124 (cumulative incidence: 6.4%) and 186 (10.7%) VTE events occurred. The best performing model for VTE prediction was machine learning-enhanced Logistic Regression (LGR) with an area under the curve of 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.67] at 6 months and 0.62 (95% CI 0.61-0.62) at 2 years-comparable to established risk assessment models (RAMs). In LGR, the strongest contributors to VTE risk were homozygous factor V Leiden mutation, rectal, testicular, and pancreatic cancer, newly diagnosed cancer, and history of VTE. CONCLUSION: Machine learning models incorporating extensive clinical and biomarker panels did not outperform existing RAMs for cancer-associated VTE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.107764
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of cancer-associated thrombosis by machine learning: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study

F. Moik, N. Vladic, C. Englisch, C.P. Spielvogel et al.
ESMO Open
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Prediction of cancer-associated thrombosis by machine learning: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study

F. Moik, N. Vladic, C. Englisch, C.P. Spielvogel, C. Ay, I. Pabinger, M. Preusser, T. Hoberstorfer, S. Nopp
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved risk prediction of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains an unmet clinical need. We aimed to apply machine learning for the prediction of cancer-associated VTE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (Vienna-CATS), a prospective cohort study that included patients with cancer from 2003-2019, were used. Patient characteristics and laboratory measurements (including various routine and experimental laboratory assays) were used to train and validate six classification models for VTE prediction. Monte Carlo cross-validation was conducted, with 80% of the samples randomly assigned to the training set and 20% to the test set. Preprocessing algorithms fitted on the training data were applied to the test data to avoid data leakage. Discrimination and input parameter influence were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 2193 patients (46.6% women) with a median age of 62 (interquartile range 52-68) years were included. The most common tumor types were lung (18.1%), brain (15.3%), and breast cancer (15.1%). Within 6 months and 2 years, 124 (cumulative incidence: 6.4%) and 186 (10.7%) VTE events occurred. The best performing model for VTE prediction was machine learning-enhanced Logistic Regression (LGR) with an area under the curve of 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.67] at 6 months and 0.62 (95% CI 0.61-0.62) at 2 years-comparable to established risk assessment models (RAMs). In LGR, the strongest contributors to VTE risk were homozygous factor V Leiden mutation, rectal, testicular, and pancreatic cancer, newly diagnosed cancer, and history of VTE. CONCLUSION: Machine learning models incorporating extensive clinical and biomarker panels did not outperform existing RAMs for cancer-associated VTE.

ESMO OpenVol. 11(6)
Medical University of Graz (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Austrian Science Fund, Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Servier, Medac, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.