Blood‐based cell‐free DNA and multitarget stool RNA screening tests to detect colorectal cancer: A systematic review

Two new tests, a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood-based test (BBT) and multitarget stool RNA (mt-sRNA) test with in-laboratory fecal immunochemical testing, were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and a second BBT is under review. These tests have the potential to overcome barriers to screening. This review evaluates the current evidence to better understand their utility for routine screening. The authors searched PubMed, other databases, and gray literature sources through March 30, 2026. Included studies examined the diagnostic accuracy, harms, and the adherence to cfDNA and mt-sRNA screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC). One investigator abstracted data, and a second confirmed. Two investigators independently assessed the risk of bias and strength of evidence. Discords were resolved through consensus. From 262 titles, 12 studies (17 publications) were included. Three studies provide moderate strength evidence to support the performance characteristics of cfDNA, and one provides low strength evidence for mt-sRNA. For cfDNA, adjusted CRC and advanced precancerous lesions sensitivities ranged from 80.8% to 81.1% and from 12.9% to 13.7%, respectively, and advanced colorectal neoplasia specificity ranged from 89.5% to 90.4%. For mt-sRNA, CRC sensitivities were 93% and 48%, and observed specificity was 90%. No studies reported serious harms, and the evidence comparing adherence was insufficient. We found that cfDNA screening tests for CRC are similar, and although mt-sRNA estimates fall below those demonstrated by mt-sDNA, its in-laboratory fecal immunochemical testing, has the potential to increase adherence. Future research examining adherence is needed, as are data from which to examine their impact on underrepresented populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70428
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood‐based cell‐free DNA and multitarget stool RNA screening tests to detect colorectal cancer: A systematic review

Rose Relevo, Karli Kondo, Jessica Griffin, Clarissa A. B. Troutman et al.
1 citations
Cancer
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
11.41
article

Blood‐based cell‐free DNA and multitarget stool RNA screening tests to detect colorectal cancer: A systematic review

Rose Relevo, Karli Kondo, Jessica Griffin, Clarissa A. B. Troutman, Rita L. Shiau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Two new tests, a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood-based test (BBT) and multitarget stool RNA (mt-sRNA) test with in-laboratory fecal immunochemical testing, were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and a second BBT is under review. These tests have the potential to overcome barriers to screening. This review evaluates the current evidence to better understand their utility for routine screening. The authors searched PubMed, other databases, and gray literature sources through March 30, 2026. Included studies examined the diagnostic accuracy, harms, and the adherence to cfDNA and mt-sRNA screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC). One investigator abstracted data, and a second confirmed. Two investigators independently assessed the risk of bias and strength of evidence. Discords were resolved through consensus. From 262 titles, 12 studies (17 publications) were included. Three studies provide moderate strength evidence to support the performance characteristics of cfDNA, and one provides low strength evidence for mt-sRNA. For cfDNA, adjusted CRC and advanced precancerous lesions sensitivities ranged from 80.8% to 81.1% and from 12.9% to 13.7%, respectively, and advanced colorectal neoplasia specificity ranged from 89.5% to 90.4%. For mt-sRNA, CRC sensitivities were 93% and 48%, and observed specificity was 90%. No studies reported serious harms, and the evidence comparing adherence was insufficient. We found that cfDNA screening tests for CRC are similar, and although mt-sRNA estimates fall below those demonstrated by mt-sDNA, its in-laboratory fecal immunochemical testing, has the potential to increase adherence. Future research examining adherence is needed, as are data from which to examine their impact on underrepresented populations.

CancerVol. 132(11)
American Cancer Society (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US)
American Cancer Society
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
11.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.