Fosnetupitant <i>Versus</i> Fosaprepitant for Delayed Vomiting Upon Irinotecan–Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Pancreatic/Colorectal Cancer

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Real-world comparative data on neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists are needed among patients receiving FOLFOXIRI or FOLFIRINOX. We aimed to evaluate the antiemetic effectiveness of fosnetupitant <i>versus</i> that of fosaprepitant in patients treated with FOLFOXIRI/FOLFIRINOX regimens for pancreatic/colorectal cancer. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> This single-center retrospective study included patients treated from April 2018 to September 2024. Patients were matched 1:1 between treatment groups <i>via</i> propensity scores based on age, sex, alcohol history, prior treatment, and regimen dose, as appropriate. Antiemetic effectiveness was assessed as no vomiting/no nausea during days 1-7; safety outcomes were also evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted to validate the robustness of the results. Between-group comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-tests for continuous variables. <h3>Results:</h3> After matching, 43 patient pairs in the pancreatic cancer cohort and 28 pairs in the colorectal cancer cohort were analyzed; the groups had generally comparable baseline characteristics. In the pancreatic cancer cohort, fosnetupitant was associated with higher no-vomiting rates during the long-delayed phase (100% <i>vs</i>. 81%, <i>p</i>=0.006) and overall period (95% <i>vs</i>. 74%, <i>p</i>=0.014) than fosaprepitant. No significant differences in effectiveness were observed in the colorectal cancer cohort. Injection site reactions were significantly less frequent with fosnetupitant in the colorectal cancer cohort (4% <i>vs</i>. 29%, <i>p</i>=0.025). These findings remained consistent in the IPTW sensitivity analysis. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> The effectiveness of fosnetupitant may vary according to cancer type, suggesting the need to tailor antiemetic strategies for patients receiving irinotecan–oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anticancer Research
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18190
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Delayed Vomiting Upon Irinotecan–Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Pancreatic/Colorectal Cancer

Toshinobu Hayashi, Fuka Aizawa, Kazuki Maeda, Takahiro Niimura et al.
Anticancer Research
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Delayed Vomiting Upon Irinotecan–Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Pancreatic/Colorectal Cancer

Toshinobu Hayashi, Fuka Aizawa, Kazuki Maeda, Takahiro Niimura, Sota Koyama, Io Horikawa, Mitsuhiro Goda, Hitoshi Fukuda, Keisuke Ishizawa, Kenta Yagi, Shinji Abe, Toshihiko Yoshioka, Yuki Izawa-Ishizawa, Tomoaki Ishida, KEI KAWADA
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Real-world comparative data on neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists are needed among patients receiving FOLFOXIRI or FOLFIRINOX. We aimed to evaluate the antiemetic effectiveness of fosnetupitant <i>versus</i> that of fosaprepitant in patients treated with FOLFOXIRI/FOLFIRINOX regimens for pancreatic/colorectal cancer. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> This single-center retrospective study included patients treated from April 2018 to September 2024. Patients were matched 1:1 between treatment groups <i>via</i> propensity scores based on age, sex, alcohol history, prior treatment, and regimen dose, as appropriate. Antiemetic effectiveness was assessed as no vomiting/no nausea during days 1-7; safety outcomes were also evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted to validate the robustness of the results. Between-group comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-tests for continuous variables. <h3>Results:</h3> After matching, 43 patient pairs in the pancreatic cancer cohort and 28 pairs in the colorectal cancer cohort were analyzed; the groups had generally comparable baseline characteristics. In the pancreatic cancer cohort, fosnetupitant was associated with higher no-vomiting rates during the long-delayed phase (100% <i>vs</i>. 81%, <i>p</i>=0.006) and overall period (95% <i>vs</i>. 74%, <i>p</i>=0.014) than fosaprepitant. No significant differences in effectiveness were observed in the colorectal cancer cohort. Injection site reactions were significantly less frequent with fosnetupitant in the colorectal cancer cohort (4% <i>vs</i>. 29%, <i>p</i>=0.025). These findings remained consistent in the IPTW sensitivity analysis. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> The effectiveness of fosnetupitant may vary according to cancer type, suggesting the need to tailor antiemetic strategies for patients receiving irinotecan–oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy.

Anticancer ResearchVol. 46(6)
Hiroshima University (JP), Shikoku University (JP), Fukuoka University (JP), Nagoya City University (JP), Tokushima University Hospital (JP), Shimane University Hospital (JP), Kōchi University (JP), Tokushima University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.