Understanding and Remediating Backlash to DEI in Organizations

This paper examines factors that have led to the dissolution of many diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in public and private organizations across the United States and globally. Although anti-DEI backlash is not new, the current wave of anti-DEI backlash is unprecedented in many ways. In response, we present a conceptual model that suggests DEI may elicit negative affective (i.e., fear, animosity) and negative cognitive responses (i.e., perceived unfairness, biased construals), particularly among individuals who are members of dominant social groups (e.g., White people, men) and who endorse hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies (i.e., system justifying ideologies, social dominance orientation). These affective and cognitive reactions have led to a series of behaviors, which we categorize as subtle, active, and ambivalent resistance. We conclude by introducing propositions that may guide future research examining ways to effectively reduce anti-DEI backlash.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Psychology Review
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866261450981
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and Remediating Backlash to DEI in Organizations

H Kim, Abigail M. Folberg, Mikki Hebl, Linda T. Nguyen et al.
Organizational Psychology Review
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Understanding and Remediating Backlash to DEI in Organizations

H Kim, Abigail M. Folberg, Mikki Hebl, Linda T. Nguyen, Heavenlei A. Thomas, Abby Corrington
article en

Abstract

This paper examines factors that have led to the dissolution of many diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in public and private organizations across the United States and globally. Although anti-DEI backlash is not new, the current wave of anti-DEI backlash is unprecedented in many ways. In response, we present a conceptual model that suggests DEI may elicit negative affective (i.e., fear, animosity) and negative cognitive responses (i.e., perceived unfairness, biased construals), particularly among individuals who are members of dominant social groups (e.g., White people, men) and who endorse hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies (i.e., system justifying ideologies, social dominance orientation). These affective and cognitive reactions have led to a series of behaviors, which we categorize as subtle, active, and ambivalent resistance. We conclude by introducing propositions that may guide future research examining ways to effectively reduce anti-DEI backlash.

Organizational Psychology Review
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Providence College (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Seattle University (US), Rice University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding and Remediating Backlash to DEI in Organizations — H Kim, Abigail M. Folberg, et al. · Organizational Psychology Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS