Body mass index and mortality in immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated cancers: A real-world propensity-matched analysis.

11069 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a cornerstone of treatment for multiple solid tumors, including lung cancer and melanoma. Emerging evidence suggests that body mass index (BMI) may influence outcomes with immunotherapy, though findings remain inconsistent and largely derived from clinical trial populations. We evaluated the association between BMI and mortality among patients with cancers treated with ICIs using real-world data. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from TriNetX, a global real-world research platform based on de-identified electronic health records. Adult patients with lung cancer or melanoma who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, including durvalumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, or atezolizumab, were identified. Patients were stratified by documented baseline body mass index into two groups: BMI 19–24.9 (Normal) and BMI 30–49.9 (Obese). To address baseline differences, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using demographics and major comorbidities. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints included inpatient hospitalization frequency. Results: Before matching, the cohorts consisted of 7,951 patients (BMI 30–49.9) and 4,651 patients (BMI 19–24.9). After PSM, 4,152 patients were included in each cohort. Baseline characteristics, including age (mean 67 years), sex (59% male), and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, CKD), were well-balanced (p > 0.05).All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the BMI 19–24.9 group compared to the BMI 30–49.9 group (49.2% vs 43.4%), with a risk ratio of 0.88 (95% CI,0.84–0.92; p < 0.001). Overall survival was significantly longer in the obese cohort, with a median survival of 1,043 days compared to 579 days in the normal BMI cohort. High BMI was associated with a 27.5% reduction in the hazard of death (HR 0.725, 95% CI 0.68–0.77; p < 0.001). Conversely, the high BMI cohort had a higher risk of inpatient encounters (57.6% vs 55.3%; p = 0.032) and a higher mean number of hospitalizations (5.4 vs 4.6; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this large real-world study, higher BMI was associated with significantly lower mortality and nearly double the median survival time in patients treated with ICIs. While higher BMI was also associated with increased hospitalization frequency, the overall survival benefit remains robust. These findings support the "obesity paradox" in immunotherapy and suggest that nutritional status is a critical determinant of long-term ICI efficacy and healthcare utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.11069
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body mass index and mortality in immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated cancers: A real-world propensity-matched analysis.

Antonio Arciniegas Rubio, Zeeshan Solangi, Amirta Devi, Razhan Madhar et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Body mass index and mortality in immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated cancers: A real-world propensity-matched analysis.

Antonio Arciniegas Rubio, Zeeshan Solangi, Amirta Devi, Razhan Madhar, Katherin Zambrano, Ahmed Abbasi, Ghulam Shah, Tornike Zabakhidze
article en

Abstract

11069 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a cornerstone of treatment for multiple solid tumors, including lung cancer and melanoma. Emerging evidence suggests that body mass index (BMI) may influence outcomes with immunotherapy, though findings remain inconsistent and largely derived from clinical trial populations. We evaluated the association between BMI and mortality among patients with cancers treated with ICIs using real-world data. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from TriNetX, a global real-world research platform based on de-identified electronic health records. Adult patients with lung cancer or melanoma who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, including durvalumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, or atezolizumab, were identified. Patients were stratified by documented baseline body mass index into two groups: BMI 19–24.9 (Normal) and BMI 30–49.9 (Obese). To address baseline differences, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using demographics and major comorbidities. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints included inpatient hospitalization frequency. Results: Before matching, the cohorts consisted of 7,951 patients (BMI 30–49.9) and 4,651 patients (BMI 19–24.9). After PSM, 4,152 patients were included in each cohort. Baseline characteristics, including age (mean 67 years), sex (59% male), and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, CKD), were well-balanced (p > 0.05).All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the BMI 19–24.9 group compared to the BMI 30–49.9 group (49.2% vs 43.4%), with a risk ratio of 0.88 (95% CI,0.84–0.92; p < 0.001). Overall survival was significantly longer in the obese cohort, with a median survival of 1,043 days compared to 579 days in the normal BMI cohort. High BMI was associated with a 27.5% reduction in the hazard of death (HR 0.725, 95% CI 0.68–0.77; p < 0.001). Conversely, the high BMI cohort had a higher risk of inpatient encounters (57.6% vs 55.3%; p = 0.032) and a higher mean number of hospitalizations (5.4 vs 4.6; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this large real-world study, higher BMI was associated with significantly lower mortality and nearly double the median survival time in patients treated with ICIs. While higher BMI was also associated with increased hospitalization frequency, the overall survival benefit remains robust. These findings support the "obesity paradox" in immunotherapy and suggest that nutritional status is a critical determinant of long-term ICI efficacy and healthcare utilization.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Berkshire Medical Center (US), Anne Arundel Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.