Phase 1b/2 study of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or pembrolizumab coformulated with vibostolimab in participants (pts) with metastatic neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC): KEYNOTE-365 cohorts F and H.

5055 Background: Effective therapy for NEPC is an unmet need due to poor prognosis and no established standard of care. The phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (pembro) + lenvatinib (lenva; cohort F) or coformulated pembro/vibostolimab (vibo; cohort H) in pts with NEPC. Methods: Pts with pathologically confirmed treatment-emergent neuroendocrine (t-NE) or de novo metastatic NEPC (small cell carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, or mixed morphology per central review), progression ≤6 mo before screening, and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 were enrolled. Prior androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic disease was required for pts with t-NE. Prior chemotherapy regimens (≤2) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and second-generation hormonal agents (≤2) were permitted. Pts in cohort F received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + lenva 20 mg PO QD. Pts in cohort H received pembro/vibo 200 mg/200 mg IV Q3W. Pembro or pembro/vibo were given for ≤35 cycles; lenva was given until discontinuation criteria were met. Primary end points were safety, ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), and confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decrease from baseline measured twice ≥3 weeks apart). Secondary end points included ORR, time to PSA progression, radiographic PFS (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3)–modified RECIST (mRECIST) v1.1 by BICR, DOR and DCR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, and OS. Results: As of August 25, 2025, 14 and 20 pts received ≥1 dose of study treatment in cohort F or cohort H, respectively. Median follow-up was 25.6 mo (range, 22.9-35.1) and 31.4 mo (range, 23.2-45.9), respectively. Among pts with RECIST-measurable disease, confirmed ORR was 23.1% (3/13; 95% CI, 5.0-53.8) in cohort F and 12.5% (2/16; 95% CI, 1.6-38.3) in cohort H. Additional efficacy results are shown in the table. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 85.7% of pts in cohort F (64.3% grade 3 or 4) and 55.0% of pts in cohort H (25.0% grade 3 or 4). No grade 5 TRAEs occurred in either cohort. In cohorts F and H, TRAEs resulted in treatment discontinuation in 21.4% and 10.0% of pts, respectively, and immune-mediated AEs occurred in 35.7% and 15.0%. Conclusions: Pembro + lenva or pembro/vibo had a manageable safety profile and only modest antitumor activity in pts with NEPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573 . Cohort Fn = 14 Cohort Hn = 20 PSA response rate (95% CI), % 14.3 (1.8-42.8) 10.0 (1.2-31.7) Median time to PSA progression (95% CI), mo NR (NR-NR) NR (2.9-NR) ORR per mRECIST v1.1 (95% CI), % 15.4 (1.9-45.4) 12.5 (1.6-38.3) DCR per RECIST v1.1 (95% CI), % 23.1 (5.0-53.8) 12.5 (1.6-38.3) Median DOR per RECIST 1.1 (95% CI), mo NR (1.1-NR) NR (8.3-NR) Median rPFS per mRECIST v1.1 (95% CI), mo 3.9 (2.1-NR) 2.0 (1.6-4.3) Median OS (95% CI), mo 4.3 (2.8-NR) 7.0 (2.5-12.9)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5055
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase 1b/2 study of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or pembrolizumab coformulated with vibostolimab in participants (pts) with metastatic neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC): KEYNOTE-365 cohorts F and H.

G. Von Amsberg, Josep M. Piulats, Christopher Eing Wee, Niven Mehra et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Phase 1b/2 study of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or pembrolizumab coformulated with vibostolimab in participants (pts) with metastatic neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC): KEYNOTE-365 cohorts F and H.

G. Von Amsberg, Josep M. Piulats, Christopher Eing Wee, Niven Mehra, Gedske Daugaard, Urban Emmenegger, Martin Boegemann, Enrique Castellanos, Lockman Bousserouel, Howard Gurney, Cagatay Arslan, Charles Schloss, Alexandra Drakaki, Kentaro Imai, Mariusz Kwiatkowski, Evan Y. Yu, Johann S. De Bono, Debbie GJ Robbrecht, Elizabeth R. Kessler
article en

Abstract

5055 Background: Effective therapy for NEPC is an unmet need due to poor prognosis and no established standard of care. The phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (pembro) + lenvatinib (lenva; cohort F) or coformulated pembro/vibostolimab (vibo; cohort H) in pts with NEPC. Methods: Pts with pathologically confirmed treatment-emergent neuroendocrine (t-NE) or de novo metastatic NEPC (small cell carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, or mixed morphology per central review), progression ≤6 mo before screening, and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 were enrolled. Prior androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic disease was required for pts with t-NE. Prior chemotherapy regimens (≤2) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and second-generation hormonal agents (≤2) were permitted. Pts in cohort F received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + lenva 20 mg PO QD. Pts in cohort H received pembro/vibo 200 mg/200 mg IV Q3W. Pembro or pembro/vibo were given for ≤35 cycles; lenva was given until discontinuation criteria were met. Primary end points were safety, ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), and confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decrease from baseline measured twice ≥3 weeks apart). Secondary end points included ORR, time to PSA progression, radiographic PFS (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3)–modified RECIST (mRECIST) v1.1 by BICR, DOR and DCR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, and OS. Results: As of August 25, 2025, 14 and 20 pts received ≥1 dose of study treatment in cohort F or cohort H, respectively. Median follow-up was 25.6 mo (range, 22.9-35.1) and 31.4 mo (range, 23.2-45.9), respectively. Among pts with RECIST-measurable disease, confirmed ORR was 23.1% (3/13; 95% CI, 5.0-53.8) in cohort F and 12.5% (2/16; 95% CI, 1.6-38.3) in cohort H. Additional efficacy results are shown in the table. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 85.7% of pts in cohort F (64.3% grade 3 or 4) and 55.0% of pts in cohort H (25.0% grade 3 or 4). No grade 5 TRAEs occurred in either cohort. In cohorts F and H, TRAEs resulted in treatment discontinuation in 21.4% and 10.0% of pts, respectively, and immune-mediated AEs occurred in 35.7% and 15.0%. Conclusions: Pembro + lenva or pembro/vibo had a manageable safety profile and only modest antitumor activity in pts with NEPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573 . Cohort Fn = 14 Cohort Hn = 20 PSA response rate (95% CI), % 14.3 (1.8-42.8) 10.0 (1.2-31.7) Median time to PSA progression (95% CI), mo NR (NR-NR) NR (2.9-NR) ORR per mRECIST v1.1 (95% CI), % 15.4 (1.9-45.4) 12.5 (1.6-38.3) DCR per RECIST v1.1 (95% CI), % 23.1 (5.0-53.8) 12.5 (1.6-38.3) Median DOR per RECIST 1.1 (95% CI), mo NR (1.1-NR) NR (8.3-NR) Median rPFS per mRECIST v1.1 (95% CI), mo 3.9 (2.1-NR) 2.0 (1.6-4.3) Median OS (95% CI), mo 4.3 (2.8-NR) 7.0 (2.5-12.9)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Institut Català d'Ornitologia (ES), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), İzmir University of Economics (TR), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Washington (US), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), University Hospital Münster (DE), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), University of Colorado Cancer Center (US), Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony (PL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Sunnybrook Hospital (CA), Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Colorado Denver (US), Macquarie University (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.