The Conceptual Context and Living Practice of Chan-Pure Land Integration in the Tang Dynasty

Chan-Pure Land integration (chanjing ronghe 禪淨融合) constituted a defining feature of the Tang-Song transition in the sphere of Buddhist religious practice. Building upon the Chan emphasis on sudden enlightenment and the Pure Land practice of Buddha-recitation developed during the early and middle Tang period, this integration took “one mind” and principle (li 理) and phenomena (shi 事) as the foundation of the theory of mind-nature. It also identified “samādhi” as the shared goal of religious cultivation and regarded “complementary and joint forms of practice” (hubu gongxiu 互補共修) as a necessary mode of religious life. While previous scholars have often emphasized either the doctrinal synthesis (Chan-Pure Land Synthesis) or the combination of living practices (dual cultivation of Chan-Pure Land), this study argues that Chan-Pure Land Integration must be understood as a dynamic, bidirectional interaction operating across three concurrent dimensions: doctrine, cultivation, and living religious practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17060651
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Conceptual Context and Living Practice of Chan-Pure Land Integration in the Tang Dynasty

Kai Sheng, Yulu Tian
Religions
Chinese history and philosophy
article

The Conceptual Context and Living Practice of Chan-Pure Land Integration in the Tang Dynasty

Kai Sheng, Yulu Tian
article en

Abstract

Chan-Pure Land integration (chanjing ronghe 禪淨融合) constituted a defining feature of the Tang-Song transition in the sphere of Buddhist religious practice. Building upon the Chan emphasis on sudden enlightenment and the Pure Land practice of Buddha-recitation developed during the early and middle Tang period, this integration took “one mind” and principle (li 理) and phenomena (shi 事) as the foundation of the theory of mind-nature. It also identified “samādhi” as the shared goal of religious cultivation and regarded “complementary and joint forms of practice” (hubu gongxiu 互補共修) as a necessary mode of religious life. While previous scholars have often emphasized either the doctrinal synthesis (Chan-Pure Land Synthesis) or the combination of living practices (dual cultivation of Chan-Pure Land), this study argues that Chan-Pure Land Integration must be understood as a dynamic, bidirectional interaction operating across three concurrent dimensions: doctrine, cultivation, and living religious practice.

ReligionsVol. 17(6)
Tsinghua University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.