Distinct prognostic roles of <i>IDH</i> mutation and high-risk genomic alterations in patients with primary chondrosarcoma.

11550 Background: Prior studies report mixed associations between IDH mutation and survival in chondrosarcoma. We evaluated the prognostic impact of IDH mutation and high-risk genomic alterations in one of the largest multi-institutional cohorts while accounting for established prognostic factors. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with histologically confirmed chondrosarcoma treated at the University of Miami and University of Florida. Patients with available molecular data were included. High-risk genomic alterations were defined as TP53, TERT, or cell-cycle pathway alterations. Endpoints included median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival (mPFS) after treatment and distant metastasis–free survival (mMFS). Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis were excluded from mMFS analyses. Multivariable Cox regression models were adjusted for age, sex, tumor grade and tumor type. Results: A total of 144 patients were included; 85 (59%) had NGS data. Median age was 60 years, and 46% had grade 3 disease. The majority of patients had conventional chondrosarcoma; 52 patients (36.1%) had dedifferentiated pathology. Among 64 IDH-mutant and 62 IDH-wildtype tumors, high-risk genomic alterations were identified in 48 patients, with comparable positive margin rates between IDH-mutant (14.1%) and IDH-wildtype (14.5%) cases. After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, tumor grade, and tumor type, IDH mutation was not independently associated with mOS (HR 1.26; p=0.48). However, IDH mutation demonstrated a trend toward inferior mPFS that did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.52; p=0.07) and was independently associated with inferior mMFS (HR 2.60; p=0.004). In contrast, high-risk genomic alterations were independently associated with inferior mOS (HR 2.45; p=0.025), mPFS (HR 2.94; p=0.003) and mMFS (HR 2.71; p=0.009) as compared to those patients without high-risk genomic alterations. Conclusions: After multivariable adjustment, IDH mutation conferred increased metastatic risk without an overall survival disadvantage, whereas high-risk genomic alterations consistently predicted poor outcomes across all survival endpoints. Multivariable Cox regression analyses by survival endpoint in chondrosarcoma. Endpoint Comparison Adjusted HR (95% CI) p-value Overall Survival IDH mutant vs IDH wildtype 1.26 (0.66–2.40) 0.48 High-risk NGS vs Low-risk NGS 2.45 (1.12–5.38) 0.025 Progression-Free Survival IDH mutant vs IDH wildtype 1.52 (0.95–2.43) 0.077 High-risk NGS vs Low-risk NGS 2.94 (1.45–5.96) 0.003 Metastasis-Free Survival IDH mutant vs IDH wildtype 2.60 (1.35–5.01) 0.0043 High-risk NGS vs Low-risk NGS 2.71 (1.28–5.74) 0.009

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.11550
Primary Topic
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct prognostic roles of IDH mutation and high-risk genomic alterations in patients with primary chondrosarcoma.

Emily E. Jonczak, Elham Nasri, Akshee Batra, Amrit Paudel et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
article

Distinct prognostic roles of IDH mutation and high-risk genomic alterations in patients with primary chondrosarcoma.

Emily E. Jonczak, Elham Nasri, Akshee Batra, Amrit Paudel, Gina Z. D’Amato, Emanuela Palmerini, Osvaldo Nunez, H Thomas Temple, Jonathan C. Trent, Allie Leigh Andryski, Kyra Taylor Berwitz, Kristen Kelly Dean, Roy Yosef Miloh, Johnathan Kass, Brooke Thomas Crawford
article en

Abstract

11550 Background: Prior studies report mixed associations between IDH mutation and survival in chondrosarcoma. We evaluated the prognostic impact of IDH mutation and high-risk genomic alterations in one of the largest multi-institutional cohorts while accounting for established prognostic factors. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with histologically confirmed chondrosarcoma treated at the University of Miami and University of Florida. Patients with available molecular data were included. High-risk genomic alterations were defined as TP53, TERT, or cell-cycle pathway alterations. Endpoints included median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival (mPFS) after treatment and distant metastasis–free survival (mMFS). Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis were excluded from mMFS analyses. Multivariable Cox regression models were adjusted for age, sex, tumor grade and tumor type. Results: A total of 144 patients were included; 85 (59%) had NGS data. Median age was 60 years, and 46% had grade 3 disease. The majority of patients had conventional chondrosarcoma; 52 patients (36.1%) had dedifferentiated pathology. Among 64 IDH-mutant and 62 IDH-wildtype tumors, high-risk genomic alterations were identified in 48 patients, with comparable positive margin rates between IDH-mutant (14.1%) and IDH-wildtype (14.5%) cases. After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, tumor grade, and tumor type, IDH mutation was not independently associated with mOS (HR 1.26; p=0.48). However, IDH mutation demonstrated a trend toward inferior mPFS that did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.52; p=0.07) and was independently associated with inferior mMFS (HR 2.60; p=0.004). In contrast, high-risk genomic alterations were independently associated with inferior mOS (HR 2.45; p=0.025), mPFS (HR 2.94; p=0.003) and mMFS (HR 2.71; p=0.009) as compared to those patients without high-risk genomic alterations. Conclusions: After multivariable adjustment, IDH mutation conferred increased metastatic risk without an overall survival disadvantage, whereas high-risk genomic alterations consistently predicted poor outcomes across all survival endpoints. Multivariable Cox regression analyses by survival endpoint in chondrosarcoma. Endpoint Comparison Adjusted HR (95% CI) p-value Overall Survival IDH mutant vs IDH wildtype 1.26 (0.66–2.40) 0.48 High-risk NGS vs Low-risk NGS 2.45 (1.12–5.38) 0.025 Progression-Free Survival IDH mutant vs IDH wildtype 1.52 (0.95–2.43) 0.077 High-risk NGS vs Low-risk NGS 2.94 (1.45–5.96) 0.003 Metastasis-Free Survival IDH mutant vs IDH wildtype 2.60 (1.35–5.01) 0.0043 High-risk NGS vs Low-risk NGS 2.71 (1.28–5.74) 0.009

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of Miami (US), University of Florida (US), Jackson Health System (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.