Germline testing in Asian American and Pacific Islander women with breast cancer.

10605 Background: Per the American Cancer Society, the overall breast cancer incidence rate rose 1% per year from 2012 to 2021, while it increased 2.7% per year for Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) women. Cases increased by 50% for AAPI women under age 50, on par with White women. This study was conducted to examine rates and results of germline genetic testing in AAPI women with breast cancer. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, AAPI women with breast cancer were identified from a non-consecutive dataset of patients undergoing multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) at a national clinical diagnostic laboratory. Descriptive statistics were performed and differences in variant frequencies between groups were assessed using two-proportion z-tests. Results: From January 2016 through April 2025, 3.8% of women who underwent germline genetic testing reported AAPI ancestry (50,043/1,320,261). AAPI women made up 4.1% of all women with breast cancer who underwent MGPT. Comparatively, the most recent U.S. Census data from 2024 showed 7.0% of the population self-identified as AAPI women. The median age of AAPI women who underwent germline testing was 54 years and the most frequent pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in order were BRCA2, BRCA1, ATM, PALB2, TP53, and CHEK2 (56.0% of P/LP variants). Most AAPI women (79%) resided in large metropolitan areas, and more than half (53%) had private insurance. AAPI women with breast cancer had lower rates of P/LP variants compared with White women (6.8% vs. 9.2%; p<0.0001) and all non-AAPI women tested (6.8% vs 8.9%; p<0.0001). Among women ≤50 years, P/LP rates remained lower in AAPI compared with White women (7.9% vs 10.7%; p<0.0001) and all non-AAPI women (7.9% vs 10.5%; p<0.0001). Younger AAPI women exhibited higher P/LP rates than older AAPI women (11.2% <40 vs 6.24% >40), consistent with age-associated trends across ethnicities (14.0% all non-AAPI <40 vs 8.45% all non-AAPI >40). Conclusions: In this study cohort, AAPI women with breast cancer make up a smaller than expected proportion of all tested women with breast cancer, despite similar breast cancer incidence rates as White women. AAPI women with breast cancer who had genetic testing tended to reside in large metropolitan areas and have private insurance. These factors and others should be considered when thinking about how to broaden access to genetic testing and counseling in the future, especially in younger AAPI women who have comparably higher rates of P/LP variants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.10605
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Germline testing in Asian American and Pacific Islander women with breast cancer.

Magan Trottier, Kristin Köhler, John Michael Ranola, Jennifer Tseng
Journal of Clinical Oncology
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Germline testing in Asian American and Pacific Islander women with breast cancer.

Magan Trottier, Kristin Köhler, John Michael Ranola, Jennifer Tseng
article en

Abstract

10605 Background: Per the American Cancer Society, the overall breast cancer incidence rate rose 1% per year from 2012 to 2021, while it increased 2.7% per year for Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) women. Cases increased by 50% for AAPI women under age 50, on par with White women. This study was conducted to examine rates and results of germline genetic testing in AAPI women with breast cancer. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, AAPI women with breast cancer were identified from a non-consecutive dataset of patients undergoing multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) at a national clinical diagnostic laboratory. Descriptive statistics were performed and differences in variant frequencies between groups were assessed using two-proportion z-tests. Results: From January 2016 through April 2025, 3.8% of women who underwent germline genetic testing reported AAPI ancestry (50,043/1,320,261). AAPI women made up 4.1% of all women with breast cancer who underwent MGPT. Comparatively, the most recent U.S. Census data from 2024 showed 7.0% of the population self-identified as AAPI women. The median age of AAPI women who underwent germline testing was 54 years and the most frequent pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in order were BRCA2, BRCA1, ATM, PALB2, TP53, and CHEK2 (56.0% of P/LP variants). Most AAPI women (79%) resided in large metropolitan areas, and more than half (53%) had private insurance. AAPI women with breast cancer had lower rates of P/LP variants compared with White women (6.8% vs. 9.2%; p<0.0001) and all non-AAPI women tested (6.8% vs 8.9%; p<0.0001). Among women ≤50 years, P/LP rates remained lower in AAPI compared with White women (7.9% vs 10.7%; p<0.0001) and all non-AAPI women (7.9% vs 10.5%; p<0.0001). Younger AAPI women exhibited higher P/LP rates than older AAPI women (11.2% <40 vs 6.24% >40), consistent with age-associated trends across ethnicities (14.0% all non-AAPI <40 vs 8.45% all non-AAPI >40). Conclusions: In this study cohort, AAPI women with breast cancer make up a smaller than expected proportion of all tested women with breast cancer, despite similar breast cancer incidence rates as White women. AAPI women with breast cancer who had genetic testing tended to reside in large metropolitan areas and have private insurance. These factors and others should be considered when thinking about how to broaden access to genetic testing and counseling in the future, especially in younger AAPI women who have comparably higher rates of P/LP variants.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
City of Hope (US), Ambry Genetics (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.