SMS message sentiment as a predictive indicator of quality of life and program adherence in oncology nutrition.

1627 Background: A text-message based artificial intelligence nutrition platform called “Ina” was previously developed and shown to be equivalent to human dietitians in providing nutritional recommendations to patients with cancer. Once registered on the platform, patient users exchange conversational texts with and receive tailored dietary recommendations and recipes from Ina. We investigated whether the emotional sentiment of SMS messages can act as a proactive predictor of program-related Quality of Life (QoL) and program adherence. Methods: QoL was captured via a 1-5 Likert scale (“Has using Ina improved your quality of life?”) survey, and program adherence was captured by a binary response to a question (“Have you used any of Ina’s suggested tips?”). We extracted SMS messages within a 60-day window prior to each survey and question. Sentiment was measured using the Jockers-Rinker lexicon via the validated sentimentr package; scores were calculated as a weighted average ranging from -1 (negative sentiment) to +1 (positive sentiment). Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were used to quantify the relationship between pre-survey message sentiment and program QoL/adherence outcomes, adjusting for total number of surveys completed and user’s unique baseline sentiment. Results: Between October 2019 and January 2026, 14,700 unique text messages were analyzed from 540 unique patient users of the platform (mean age: 51± 20 years; 91% female). Cancer types included breast (40%), ovarian (24%), bladder (16%), lung (13%), and colon (7%); metastases were present among 34%. For every one-point improvement in digital sentiment, users experienced a 14% improvement in subsequent program-related QoL (𝛽= 0.72, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a trend toward an association between higher positive digital sentiment and subsequent reported adherence to nutritional recommendations (𝛽 = 0.12, p = 0.097). Conclusions: Sentiment analysis of unstructured SMS messages successfully identified subtle shifts in digital tone that precede structured assessments. This 'leading indicator' of sentiment could enable proactive supportive care and provider escalation for timely triage and intervention. Given rapid symptomatic deterioration in oncology that often leads to non-adherence, text-based sentiment analysis could enable early detection of declining engagement to support improved quality of life and long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1627
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SMS message sentiment as a predictive indicator of quality of life and program adherence in oncology nutrition.

Neil M. Iyengar, Mélanie Guirette, Vera Steullet, Stacy Loeb et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

SMS message sentiment as a predictive indicator of quality of life and program adherence in oncology nutrition.

Neil M. Iyengar, Mélanie Guirette, Vera Steullet, Stacy Loeb, Ethan Basch, Marissa Buchan, Susan Bratton
article en

Abstract

1627 Background: A text-message based artificial intelligence nutrition platform called “Ina” was previously developed and shown to be equivalent to human dietitians in providing nutritional recommendations to patients with cancer. Once registered on the platform, patient users exchange conversational texts with and receive tailored dietary recommendations and recipes from Ina. We investigated whether the emotional sentiment of SMS messages can act as a proactive predictor of program-related Quality of Life (QoL) and program adherence. Methods: QoL was captured via a 1-5 Likert scale (“Has using Ina improved your quality of life?”) survey, and program adherence was captured by a binary response to a question (“Have you used any of Ina’s suggested tips?”). We extracted SMS messages within a 60-day window prior to each survey and question. Sentiment was measured using the Jockers-Rinker lexicon via the validated sentimentr package; scores were calculated as a weighted average ranging from -1 (negative sentiment) to +1 (positive sentiment). Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were used to quantify the relationship between pre-survey message sentiment and program QoL/adherence outcomes, adjusting for total number of surveys completed and user’s unique baseline sentiment. Results: Between October 2019 and January 2026, 14,700 unique text messages were analyzed from 540 unique patient users of the platform (mean age: 51± 20 years; 91% female). Cancer types included breast (40%), ovarian (24%), bladder (16%), lung (13%), and colon (7%); metastases were present among 34%. For every one-point improvement in digital sentiment, users experienced a 14% improvement in subsequent program-related QoL (𝛽= 0.72, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a trend toward an association between higher positive digital sentiment and subsequent reported adherence to nutritional recommendations (𝛽 = 0.12, p = 0.097). Conclusions: Sentiment analysis of unstructured SMS messages successfully identified subtle shifts in digital tone that precede structured assessments. This 'leading indicator' of sentiment could enable proactive supportive care and provider escalation for timely triage and intervention. Given rapid symptomatic deterioration in oncology that often leads to non-adherence, text-based sentiment analysis could enable early detection of declining engagement to support improved quality of life and long-term outcomes.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Save the Children (US), Emory University (US), NYU Langone Health (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.