Temporary carbon dioxide removal to offset short-lived climate forcers

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is considered for achieving the long-term temperature objectives of the Paris Agreement and national net-zero emission targets1–5. The durability of these CDR methods varies widely, ranging from decades to theoretically permanent6. Temporary CDR dominates present deployment, whereas permanent solutions face further feasibility and cost challenges at scale1. However, efforts to integrate temporary CDR into climate policies have relied on equivalency assumptions between temporary and permanent CDR that contradict physical climate science: temporary CDR cannot fully offset CO2 emissions as permanent CDR can6,7. Here we show that temporary CDR can serve as compensation for non-CO2 climate forcers, particularly for short-lived species whose compensation ratios are fairly insensitive to the choice of time horizon. For instance, offsetting 1 kg CH4 requires 498 kg CO2 with 20-year temporary storage (such as bioplastics) or 101 kg CO2 with 100-year storage (such as durable wood products). We suggest a critical lifetime threshold separating short-lived and long-lived species for temporary CDR applications, with implementation requiring differentiated reporting of these categories. This framework can provide a physical basis for crediting temporary CDR activities in sectors such as agriculture, in which non-CO2 emissions dominate and direct emission reductions remain challenging. Temporary carbon dioxide removal can offset short-lived non-CO2 climate forcers, providing a viable physical approach for crediting temporary carbon dioxide removal activities in industries in which non-CO2 emissions dominate and direct emission reductions are difficult.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10607-3
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporary carbon dioxide removal to offset short-lived climate forcers

Thomas Gasser, Yue He, Shilong Piao, Matthew J. Gidden et al.
Nature
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Temporary carbon dioxide removal to offset short-lived climate forcers

Thomas Gasser, Yue He, Shilong Piao, Matthew J. Gidden, Keywan Riahi, Tao Wang
article en

Abstract

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is considered for achieving the long-term temperature objectives of the Paris Agreement and national net-zero emission targets1–5. The durability of these CDR methods varies widely, ranging from decades to theoretically permanent6. Temporary CDR dominates present deployment, whereas permanent solutions face further feasibility and cost challenges at scale1. However, efforts to integrate temporary CDR into climate policies have relied on equivalency assumptions between temporary and permanent CDR that contradict physical climate science: temporary CDR cannot fully offset CO2 emissions as permanent CDR can6,7. Here we show that temporary CDR can serve as compensation for non-CO2 climate forcers, particularly for short-lived species whose compensation ratios are fairly insensitive to the choice of time horizon. For instance, offsetting 1 kg CH4 requires 498 kg CO2 with 20-year temporary storage (such as bioplastics) or 101 kg CO2 with 100-year storage (such as durable wood products). We suggest a critical lifetime threshold separating short-lived and long-lived species for temporary CDR applications, with implementation requiring differentiated reporting of these categories. This framework can provide a physical basis for crediting temporary CDR activities in sectors such as agriculture, in which non-CO2 emissions dominate and direct emission reductions remain challenging. Temporary carbon dioxide removal can offset short-lived non-CO2 climate forcers, providing a viable physical approach for crediting temporary carbon dioxide removal activities in industries in which non-CO2 emissions dominate and direct emission reductions are difficult.

Nature
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (CN), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.