Efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in <i>RET</i> fusion–positive solid tumors: Data from the TAPISTRY trial.

3144 Background: Pralsetinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively and potently targets oncogenic RET fusion and mutation proteins, present in multiple tumor types. We report results from the phase 2 TAPISTRY study (NCT04589845), a global, open-label, multicohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in a cohort of patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumors. Methods: Eligible patients ≥12 years old with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive solid tumors received 400 mg pralsetinib QD until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or unacceptable toxicity. Independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included IRC-assessed duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled and received ≥1 pralsetinib dose; 78% had ≤1 prior line of therapy in the metastatic setting. Median age was 56 y (range: 12-79); 61% were male. Median treatment duration was 14.3 mo (range: 0.7-31.5). Cancers included thyroid (n=18, 39%); colorectal (n=9, 20%); head and neck (n=4, 9%); pancreatic (n=4, 9%); hepatobiliary (n=3, 7%); CNS, sarcoma, and neuroendocrine and adrenal (n=2, 4% each); gastroesophageal (n=1, 2%); and unknown primary origin (n=1, 2%). ORR for the efficacy evaluable population (n=39) was 67% (95% CI: 50, 81; Table), with 5 (13%) CRs and 21 (54%) PRs. Intracranial response was observed in 1/2 (50%) patients with baseline CNS metastases. All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 33/46 (72%) reported TRAEs grade ≥3. The most common TRAEs included anemia (n=18; 39%), increased AST (n=16; 35%), and decreased neutrophil count (n=13; 28%). Hypertension was reported in 11 (24%) patients, with 3 (7%) reporting grade ≥3. Safety results were consistent with the known pralsetinib profile, with no new signals. Conclusions: Pralsetinib demonstrated robust and durable activity against RET fusion-positive solid tumors, with an ORR of 67%. These data validate RET fusions as a tissue-agnostic target with sensitivity to RET inhibition, suggesting therapeutic utility of pralsetinib. Clinical trial information: NCT04589845 . Efficacy summary by tumor type. Overall(N=39) Thyroid (n=16) Pancreatic (n=3) Colorectal (n=8) Hepatobiliary (n=3) Head and Neck (n=3) ORR, % (95% CI) 67(50, 81) 81(54, 96) 67(9, 99) 38(9, 76) 33(1, 91) 100(29, 100) DOR, median, mo (95% CI) 26.7(14.7, NE) 26.7(26.7, NE) 3.9(3.7, NE) 12.2(5.7, NE) 14.9(NE) NE PFS, median, mo (95% CI) 16.5(7.2, NE) 30.3(16.3, NE) 5.6(1.9, NE) 6.5(1.6, 12.9) 8.3(1.4, NE) NE OS, median, mo (95% CI) 30.8(16.3, NE) NE(NE) 21.7(12.7, NE) 10.2(5.7, NE) 13.8(8.3, NE) NE Follow-up, median, mo (range) 14.5(2, 32) 19.4(10, 32) 12.6(2, 31) 9.2(2, 19) 8.3(2, 19) 14.3(14, 27) NE, not evaluable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.3144
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in RET fusion–positive solid tumors: Data from the TAPISTRY trial.

Jae‐Joong Kim, Amber Thomassen, Sophia Wang, Luis G. Paz-Ares et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in RET fusion–positive solid tumors: Data from the TAPISTRY trial.

Jae‐Joong Kim, Amber Thomassen, Sophia Wang, Luis G. Paz-Ares, Do-Youn Oh, Hidetoshi Hayashi, Chia-Chi Lin
article en

Abstract

3144 Background: Pralsetinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively and potently targets oncogenic RET fusion and mutation proteins, present in multiple tumor types. We report results from the phase 2 TAPISTRY study (NCT04589845), a global, open-label, multicohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in a cohort of patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumors. Methods: Eligible patients ≥12 years old with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive solid tumors received 400 mg pralsetinib QD until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or unacceptable toxicity. Independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included IRC-assessed duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled and received ≥1 pralsetinib dose; 78% had ≤1 prior line of therapy in the metastatic setting. Median age was 56 y (range: 12-79); 61% were male. Median treatment duration was 14.3 mo (range: 0.7-31.5). Cancers included thyroid (n=18, 39%); colorectal (n=9, 20%); head and neck (n=4, 9%); pancreatic (n=4, 9%); hepatobiliary (n=3, 7%); CNS, sarcoma, and neuroendocrine and adrenal (n=2, 4% each); gastroesophageal (n=1, 2%); and unknown primary origin (n=1, 2%). ORR for the efficacy evaluable population (n=39) was 67% (95% CI: 50, 81; Table), with 5 (13%) CRs and 21 (54%) PRs. Intracranial response was observed in 1/2 (50%) patients with baseline CNS metastases. All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 33/46 (72%) reported TRAEs grade ≥3. The most common TRAEs included anemia (n=18; 39%), increased AST (n=16; 35%), and decreased neutrophil count (n=13; 28%). Hypertension was reported in 11 (24%) patients, with 3 (7%) reporting grade ≥3. Safety results were consistent with the known pralsetinib profile, with no new signals. Conclusions: Pralsetinib demonstrated robust and durable activity against RET fusion-positive solid tumors, with an ORR of 67%. These data validate RET fusions as a tissue-agnostic target with sensitivity to RET inhibition, suggesting therapeutic utility of pralsetinib. Clinical trial information: NCT04589845 . Efficacy summary by tumor type. Overall(N=39) Thyroid (n=16) Pancreatic (n=3) Colorectal (n=8) Hepatobiliary (n=3) Head and Neck (n=3) ORR, % (95% CI) 67(50, 81) 81(54, 96) 67(9, 99) 38(9, 76) 33(1, 91) 100(29, 100) DOR, median, mo (95% CI) 26.7(14.7, NE) 26.7(26.7, NE) 3.9(3.7, NE) 12.2(5.7, NE) 14.9(NE) NE PFS, median, mo (95% CI) 16.5(7.2, NE) 30.3(16.3, NE) 5.6(1.9, NE) 6.5(1.6, 12.9) 8.3(1.4, NE) NE OS, median, mo (95% CI) 30.8(16.3, NE) NE(NE) 21.7(12.7, NE) 10.2(5.7, NE) 13.8(8.3, NE) NE Follow-up, median, mo (range) 14.5(2, 32) 19.4(10, 32) 12.6(2, 31) 9.2(2, 19) 8.3(2, 19) 14.3(14, 27) NE, not evaluable.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Rigel (United States) (US), Kindai University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.