Vocational rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic scoping review of international evidence

INTRODUCTION: People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) may encounter challenges in their professional lives, due to a combination of environmental and individual factors. According to Escorpizo et al., 2011 framework, Vocational rehabilitation (VR) aims to optimise job participation, providing support in the job access, retention and in the return to work for people with disability. However, the corpus of research on VR for pwMS is poor. This scoping review aims to map the available literature on VR interventions for pwMS, summarising their characteristics, study designs, implementation features, feasibility, and stakeholders' perspectives. METHODS: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, seven databases were searched up to October 2025: PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Google Scholar, OT Seeker (University of Queensland), and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Studies were eligible if they were related to VR interventions for pwMS, focused on job access, return, or retention and if they were primary articles. Data were extracted and synthesised following the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework. RESULTS: Out of 2,360 records, 28 articles describing 28 distinct VR interventions were included. Studies were published between 1996 and 2025, mostly from Western countries. Designs ranged from descriptive to randomized trials, with an increasing number of interventional and feasibility studies in recent years. The 61% of the interventions were multi-dimensional delivering a combination of rehabilitation, educational, and reasonable accommodation services. PwMS highlighted the importance of empathetic and individualized approaches, symptom management, and legal counselling as key elements in VR interventions, while logistical, personal and health issues were barriers to participation. Overall, interventions were considered feasible and acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive overview of VR interventions for pwMS, outlining a progressive shift toward multidisciplinary and goal-oriented approaches over time. Despite promising feasibility and stakeholder satisfaction, further rigorous trials are needed to evaluate effectiveness and inform evidence-based implementation of VR programmes in diverse contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350122
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vocational rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic scoping review of international evidence

Tommaso Manacorda, Giorgia Presicce, Guglielmo Dini, Benedetta Persechino et al.
PLoS ONE
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Vocational rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic scoping review of international evidence

Tommaso Manacorda, Giorgia Presicce, Guglielmo Dini, Benedetta Persechino, Michela Ponzio, Paolo Durando, Federica Rotondi, Erica Grange, Elena Pignattelli, Marco Salivetto, Lorenza Nasone, Maria Grazia Grasso, Giampaolo Brichetto, Matilde Inglese, Carlotta Gualco
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) may encounter challenges in their professional lives, due to a combination of environmental and individual factors. According to Escorpizo et al., 2011 framework, Vocational rehabilitation (VR) aims to optimise job participation, providing support in the job access, retention and in the return to work for people with disability. However, the corpus of research on VR for pwMS is poor. This scoping review aims to map the available literature on VR interventions for pwMS, summarising their characteristics, study designs, implementation features, feasibility, and stakeholders' perspectives. METHODS: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, seven databases were searched up to October 2025: PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Google Scholar, OT Seeker (University of Queensland), and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Studies were eligible if they were related to VR interventions for pwMS, focused on job access, return, or retention and if they were primary articles. Data were extracted and synthesised following the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework. RESULTS: Out of 2,360 records, 28 articles describing 28 distinct VR interventions were included. Studies were published between 1996 and 2025, mostly from Western countries. Designs ranged from descriptive to randomized trials, with an increasing number of interventional and feasibility studies in recent years. The 61% of the interventions were multi-dimensional delivering a combination of rehabilitation, educational, and reasonable accommodation services. PwMS highlighted the importance of empathetic and individualized approaches, symptom management, and legal counselling as key elements in VR interventions, while logistical, personal and health issues were barriers to participation. Overall, interventions were considered feasible and acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive overview of VR interventions for pwMS, outlining a progressive shift toward multidisciplinary and goal-oriented approaches over time. Despite promising feasibility and stakeholder satisfaction, further rigorous trials are needed to evaluate effectiveness and inform evidence-based implementation of VR programmes in diverse contexts.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(5)
Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (US), Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (IT), Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Metropolitana Milanese (Italy) (IT), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.