Early outcomes of aortic root repair after previous ascending aorta and aortic valve surgery

Objective. To evaluate early outcomes of aortic root reconstruction in patients with prior ascending aorta and/or aortic valve surgery. Material and methods. A retrospective single-center study included 34 patients who underwent aortic root reconstruction between 2011 and 2026 after previous ascending aorta and/or aortic valve surgery. Median of age was 54.5 (44.5; 63) years, and males comprised 85%. Previous procedures included aortic valve replacement (53%) and ascending aortic replacement (47%). Intraoperative data, procedural characteristics and early postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results. The main indications for redo surgery were aortic root aneurysm (50%) and aneurysm combined with residual Stanford type A dissection (38%). Bentall—DeBono procedure was performed in 85% of cases, David procedure — in 12% of cases. Concomitant aortic arch procedures were required in 73% of patients, including frozen elephant trunk in 20% of patients. Median of surgery time was 336 (264; 429) min. Intraoperative technical difficulties with injury of cardiac or vascular structures occurred in 26% of patients. Early postoperative arrhythmias were observed in 6%, atrioventricular block — in 12% with permanent pacemaker implantation in 6% of cases. Aortic graft infection was diagnosed in 9% of cases. There was no in-hospital mortality. Conclusion. Redo aortic root reconstruction is a technically demanding procedure requiring individual surgical strategies. Favorable early outcomes can be achieved in specialized centers, even in cases requiring extensive aortic arch reconstruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio20261903175
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early outcomes of aortic root repair after previous ascending aorta and aortic valve surgery

Omar Mutaev, S. O. Popov, E.R. Charchyan
Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Early outcomes of aortic root repair after previous ascending aorta and aortic valve surgery

Omar Mutaev, S. O. Popov, E.R. Charchyan
article en

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate early outcomes of aortic root reconstruction in patients with prior ascending aorta and/or aortic valve surgery. Material and methods. A retrospective single-center study included 34 patients who underwent aortic root reconstruction between 2011 and 2026 after previous ascending aorta and/or aortic valve surgery. Median of age was 54.5 (44.5; 63) years, and males comprised 85%. Previous procedures included aortic valve replacement (53%) and ascending aortic replacement (47%). Intraoperative data, procedural characteristics and early postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results. The main indications for redo surgery were aortic root aneurysm (50%) and aneurysm combined with residual Stanford type A dissection (38%). Bentall—DeBono procedure was performed in 85% of cases, David procedure — in 12% of cases. Concomitant aortic arch procedures were required in 73% of patients, including frozen elephant trunk in 20% of patients. Median of surgery time was 336 (264; 429) min. Intraoperative technical difficulties with injury of cardiac or vascular structures occurred in 26% of patients. Early postoperative arrhythmias were observed in 6%, atrioventricular block — in 12% with permanent pacemaker implantation in 6% of cases. Aortic graft infection was diagnosed in 9% of cases. There was no in-hospital mortality. Conclusion. Redo aortic root reconstruction is a technically demanding procedure requiring individual surgical strategies. Favorable early outcomes can be achieved in specialized centers, even in cases requiring extensive aortic arch reconstruction.

Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 19(3)
Russian Scientific Center of Surgery (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.