External validation of new prostate cancer risk groups by PSMA-PET (PPP3).

5112 Background: Previously, we proposed novel risk group definitions for prostate cancer patients based on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) targeted positron emission tomography (PET). PSMA-PET pan-stage nomograms (PPP3) were developed using the international, multicentre PROMISE registry (NCT06320223) to prognosticate overall survival (OS). Here, we present an external validation of PPP3. Methods: Eligible patients enrolled into our PROMISE registry database after the PPP3 data cap were included into this external validation study. Included patients had histologically proven prostate cancer and underwent PSMA-PET at hospitals in Turkey, Cyprus, Italy, China, South Africa or Germany between 2015 and 2022. PSMA-PET was standardized by PROMISE version 2 (V2); total lesion count, total tumor volume, PSMA expression score and OS follow-up were obtained as per local site practice. PPP3 nomograms were applied to calculate risk groups and Harrell´s C-indices for the external validation cohort. Calibration curves were measured for 5-year OS. Head-to-head comparison between the visual PPP3 nomogram and the simplified risk stratification table was examined by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC). Results: 1855 male patients across all disease stages with 179 (9.6%) reported deaths and median OS follow-up of 4.8 years (IQR 3.7-6.1) were analysed. In the external validation cohort C-indices (95% CI) were 0.71 (0.67-0.76) for the visual nomogram and 0.73 (0.69-0.77) for the quantitative nomogram, respectively. By simplified risk stratification table, 77 of 1855 patients (4.2%) were underestimated and 16 (0.9%) were overestimated, when compared with visual nomograms. Prognostic accuracy was comparable using both methods (AUC Nomogram: 0.64 vs. AUC Table: 0.63, p = 0.02). Conclusions: PPP3 nomograms were validated in an external multi-site patient cohort. Prognostication was accurate (C-indices > 0.70) for both PPP3 nomograms. Clinical trial information: NCT06320223 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5112
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External validation of new prostate cancer risk groups by PSMA-PET (PPP3).

Ali Kibar, Caner Civan, Francesco Mattana, Sebastian Hoberück et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

External validation of new prostate cancer risk groups by PSMA-PET (PPP3).

Ali Kibar, Caner Civan, Francesco Mattana, Sebastian Hoberück, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Dilsat Fırat Arslan, Madeleine Josefine Karpinski, Boris A. Hadaschik, Kambiz Rahbar, Michael Sathekge, Weijun Wei, Weijing Tao, Alexis Vrachimis, Ken Herrmann, Tobias Maurer
article en

Abstract

5112 Background: Previously, we proposed novel risk group definitions for prostate cancer patients based on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) targeted positron emission tomography (PET). PSMA-PET pan-stage nomograms (PPP3) were developed using the international, multicentre PROMISE registry (NCT06320223) to prognosticate overall survival (OS). Here, we present an external validation of PPP3. Methods: Eligible patients enrolled into our PROMISE registry database after the PPP3 data cap were included into this external validation study. Included patients had histologically proven prostate cancer and underwent PSMA-PET at hospitals in Turkey, Cyprus, Italy, China, South Africa or Germany between 2015 and 2022. PSMA-PET was standardized by PROMISE version 2 (V2); total lesion count, total tumor volume, PSMA expression score and OS follow-up were obtained as per local site practice. PPP3 nomograms were applied to calculate risk groups and Harrell´s C-indices for the external validation cohort. Calibration curves were measured for 5-year OS. Head-to-head comparison between the visual PPP3 nomogram and the simplified risk stratification table was examined by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC). Results: 1855 male patients across all disease stages with 179 (9.6%) reported deaths and median OS follow-up of 4.8 years (IQR 3.7-6.1) were analysed. In the external validation cohort C-indices (95% CI) were 0.71 (0.67-0.76) for the visual nomogram and 0.73 (0.69-0.77) for the quantitative nomogram, respectively. By simplified risk stratification table, 77 of 1855 patients (4.2%) were underestimated and 16 (0.9%) were overestimated, when compared with visual nomograms. Prognostic accuracy was comparable using both methods (AUC Nomogram: 0.64 vs. AUC Table: 0.63, p = 0.02). Conclusions: PPP3 nomograms were validated in an external multi-site patient cohort. Prognostication was accurate (C-indices > 0.70) for both PPP3 nomograms. Clinical trial information: NCT06320223 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Trakya University (TR), Universität Hamburg (DE), Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Renji Hospital (CN), Steve Biko Hospital (ZA), University Hospital Münster (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Martini-Klinik (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Second People’s Hospital of Huai’an (CN), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), European Institute of Oncology (IT), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Istanbul University (TR), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Prostate Cancer Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.