A three-stage framework for spatial prediction of soil heavy metal(loid)s: Integrating in-situ FPXRF calibration, source apportionment, and refined land-use effects

High–accuracy spatial mapping of soil heavy metal(loid)s (HMs) is essential for targeted environmental management. However, intensive human disturbances complicate the spatial variation structures of soil HMs and raise the investigation costs. To tackle these challenges, we propose a three-stage framework for spatially predicting soil HMs. First, a robust geographically weighted regression model integrating land-use types (RGWR-LU) was developed to spatially calibrate the in-situ field portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) multi-HM dataset in an intensively human-impacted area of China. Second, a robust spatial receptor model integrating the RGWR–LU–calibrated in–situ FPXRF multi-HM dataset (RAPCS/RGWR–FPXRF) was established to derive the dominant source–contribution covariate and the refined land‑use effects free from interferences of other sources. Third, a robust residual cokriging framework integrating the calibrated FPXRF data, the dominant source–contribution covariate, and the refined land–use effects (RRCoK–FPXRF·SC·LU) was proposed for spatially predicting soil HMs. Key results demonstrate that: (1) RGWR–LU achieved higher spatial calibration accuracy for in–situ FPXRF multi-HM dataset ( RI > 72.08%) than RGWR, GWR, and the traditional ordinary least squares regression; (2) RAPCS/RGWR–FPXRF provided higher source–apportionment accuracy than the basic robust spatial receptor model (RAPCS/RGWR) and the traditional receptor model (APCS/MLR), yielding more effective source–contribution covariate and refined land–use effects for spatial prediction; and (3) RRCoK–FPXRF·SC·LU exhibited the highest spatial prediction accuracy among the seven evaluated models (e.g., for Cu, RMSE decreased from 7.46 mg kg⁻ 1 for ordinary kriging to 2.03 mg kg⁻ 1 for RRCoK‑FPXRF·SC·LU, with RI = 72.79%). This study presents a cost-effective, high-accuracy methodology for spatially predicting soil HMs in intensively human-impacted areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117868
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A three-stage framework for spatial prediction of soil heavy metal(loid)s: Integrating in-situ FPXRF calibration, source apportionment, and refined land-use effects

Junpeng Diao, G Xu, Yongcun Zhao, Xia Song et al.
Geoderma
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

A three-stage framework for spatial prediction of soil heavy metal(loid)s: Integrating in-situ FPXRF calibration, source apportionment, and refined land-use effects

Junpeng Diao, G Xu, Yongcun Zhao, Xia Song, Mingkai Qu, Yujun Wang, Biao Huang
article en

Abstract

High–accuracy spatial mapping of soil heavy metal(loid)s (HMs) is essential for targeted environmental management. However, intensive human disturbances complicate the spatial variation structures of soil HMs and raise the investigation costs. To tackle these challenges, we propose a three-stage framework for spatially predicting soil HMs. First, a robust geographically weighted regression model integrating land-use types (RGWR-LU) was developed to spatially calibrate the in-situ field portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) multi-HM dataset in an intensively human-impacted area of China. Second, a robust spatial receptor model integrating the RGWR–LU–calibrated in–situ FPXRF multi-HM dataset (RAPCS/RGWR–FPXRF) was established to derive the dominant source–contribution covariate and the refined land‑use effects free from interferences of other sources. Third, a robust residual cokriging framework integrating the calibrated FPXRF data, the dominant source–contribution covariate, and the refined land–use effects (RRCoK–FPXRF·SC·LU) was proposed for spatially predicting soil HMs. Key results demonstrate that: (1) RGWR–LU achieved higher spatial calibration accuracy for in–situ FPXRF multi-HM dataset ( RI > 72.08%) than RGWR, GWR, and the traditional ordinary least squares regression; (2) RAPCS/RGWR–FPXRF provided higher source–apportionment accuracy than the basic robust spatial receptor model (RAPCS/RGWR) and the traditional receptor model (APCS/MLR), yielding more effective source–contribution covariate and refined land–use effects for spatial prediction; and (3) RRCoK–FPXRF·SC·LU exhibited the highest spatial prediction accuracy among the seven evaluated models (e.g., for Cu, RMSE decreased from 7.46 mg kg⁻ 1 for ordinary kriging to 2.03 mg kg⁻ 1 for RRCoK‑FPXRF·SC·LU, with RI = 72.79%). This study presents a cost-effective, high-accuracy methodology for spatially predicting soil HMs in intensively human-impacted areas.

GeodermaVol. 471
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Soil Science (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.