Izalontamab brengitecan (iza-bren) versus chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study.

4008 Background: Chemotherapy plus a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor is the standard first-line treatment for PD-L1 expressing advanced ESCC. However, most patients (pts) inevitably develop resistance to first-line therapy, and second-line chemotherapy shows an ORR of less than 10% and a median OS of less than 6 mo, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutics. Iza-bren is a potentially first-in-class ADC consisting of an EGFR-HER3 bispecific antibody conjugated to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor Ed-04 via a cleavable linker. Iza-bren has shown promising clinical activity in previously treated ESCC pts in phase I study. Here, we present results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study conducted in China evaluating the efficacy and safety of iza-bren versus chemotherapy as second line treatment for advanced ESCC. Methods: Pts with recurrent or metastatic ESCC who had progressed after first-line treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive iza-bren (2.5 mg/kg at D1D8 Q3W) or physician’s choice of chemotherapy (irinotecan, paclitaxel, or docetaxel Q3W). Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Oct 17, 2025, a total of 497 pts were randomized to iza-bren (n = 249) or chemotherapy (n = 248). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. At interim analysis, median follow-up for OS was 7.8 mo in the iza-bren group and 7.6 mo in the chemotherapy group. Iza-bren has demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both OS and PFS by BICR compared with chemotherapy. The median OS was 9.8 mo (95% CI, 7.9 to 11.0) with iza-bren and 7.2 mo (95% CI, 6.2 to 8.2) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.83; P = 0.0004). The median PFS by BICR was 4.2 mo (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.5) with iza-bren and 2.0 mo (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.7) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63; P < 0.0001). ORR by BICR was 35.3% for iza-bren and 13.1% for chemotherapy. Grade≥3 TRAEs, which were predominantly hematologic in nature, occurred in 85.1% in the iza-bren group and 60.2% in the chemotherapy group. TRAEs leading to drug discontinuation were 2.0% in the iza-bren group and 3.3% in the chemotherapy group. TRAEs leading to death were 1.2% in the iza-bren group and 1.6% in the chemotherapy group. Conclusions: The study met both dual primary endpoints at prespecified interim analysis. Iza-bren demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in pts with recurrent or metastatic ESCC who had progressed after first line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The safety profile was manageable. The results support iza-bren as a new second-line standard of care for ESCC. Clinical trial information: NCT06304974 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.4008
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Izalontamab brengitecan (iza-bren) versus chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study.

Fang Wang, Guochun Cao, Zhangzhou Huang, Z T Lu et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
article

Izalontamab brengitecan (iza-bren) versus chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study.

Fang Wang, Guochun Cao, Zhangzhou Huang, Z T Lu, L Shen, Sa Xiao, Tianshu Liu, Jin Zhou, Tao Wu, Wei Li, Yong Fang, Qingsong Pang, Ning Li, Yun Fan, Xiangjiao Meng, Yi Zhu, Yanqiao Zhang, Hai Zhu, Shegan Gao
article en

Abstract

4008 Background: Chemotherapy plus a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor is the standard first-line treatment for PD-L1 expressing advanced ESCC. However, most patients (pts) inevitably develop resistance to first-line therapy, and second-line chemotherapy shows an ORR of less than 10% and a median OS of less than 6 mo, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutics. Iza-bren is a potentially first-in-class ADC consisting of an EGFR-HER3 bispecific antibody conjugated to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor Ed-04 via a cleavable linker. Iza-bren has shown promising clinical activity in previously treated ESCC pts in phase I study. Here, we present results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study conducted in China evaluating the efficacy and safety of iza-bren versus chemotherapy as second line treatment for advanced ESCC. Methods: Pts with recurrent or metastatic ESCC who had progressed after first-line treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive iza-bren (2.5 mg/kg at D1D8 Q3W) or physician’s choice of chemotherapy (irinotecan, paclitaxel, or docetaxel Q3W). Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Oct 17, 2025, a total of 497 pts were randomized to iza-bren (n = 249) or chemotherapy (n = 248). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. At interim analysis, median follow-up for OS was 7.8 mo in the iza-bren group and 7.6 mo in the chemotherapy group. Iza-bren has demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both OS and PFS by BICR compared with chemotherapy. The median OS was 9.8 mo (95% CI, 7.9 to 11.0) with iza-bren and 7.2 mo (95% CI, 6.2 to 8.2) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.83; P = 0.0004). The median PFS by BICR was 4.2 mo (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.5) with iza-bren and 2.0 mo (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.7) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63; P < 0.0001). ORR by BICR was 35.3% for iza-bren and 13.1% for chemotherapy. Grade≥3 TRAEs, which were predominantly hematologic in nature, occurred in 85.1% in the iza-bren group and 60.2% in the chemotherapy group. TRAEs leading to drug discontinuation were 2.0% in the iza-bren group and 3.3% in the chemotherapy group. TRAEs leading to death were 1.2% in the iza-bren group and 1.6% in the chemotherapy group. Conclusions: The study met both dual primary endpoints at prespecified interim analysis. Iza-bren demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in pts with recurrent or metastatic ESCC who had progressed after first line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The safety profile was manageable. The results support iza-bren as a new second-line standard of care for ESCC. Clinical trial information: NCT06304974 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Harbin Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Jilin University (CN), Peking University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN), Shandong Tumor Hospital (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Chengdu Organic Chemicals (China) (CN), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN), First Hospital of Jilin University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology (CN), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN), Anyang Tumor Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.