The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer with microsatellite instability-high or DNA mismatch repair deficiencies: A multicenter pooled analysis (KCSG-CO24-03).

3622 Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) for high-risk stage II MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer remains controversial, with discordant international guidelines. This study evaluated clinical outcomes comparing adjuvant CTx vs. observation in this population. Methods: This multicenter retrospective analysis included 192 patients with high-risk stage II MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer who underwent curative resection (2010-2020). High-risk features included pT4, grade 3-4, lymphovascular invasion, bowel obstruction/perforation, perineural invasion (PNI), inadequate lymph node sampling (<12), or close margins. Primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included 5-year overall survival (OS). A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed. Results: Of 192 patients, 128 (66.6%) received adjuvant CTx (FOLFOX n=66, capecitabine n=40, FL n=17, others n=5) and 64 (33.3%) underwent observation. Median follow-up was 60.5 months. During follow-up, 24 RFS events and 15 OS events occurred. The 5-year RFS was significantly higher with adjuvant CTx versus observation (94.0% vs. 83.7%; P=.001), as was 5-year OS (98.3% vs. 89.0%; P=.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant CTx as an independent prognostic factor for both RFS (HR 0.278, 95%CI 0.117-0.660; P=.003) and OS (HR 0.176, 95%CI 0.052-0.594; P=.005). PNI independently predicted worse RFS (HR 4.053; P=.002) and OS (HR 7.490; P=.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated pronounced benefit in pT4 patients (OS HR 0.094, P=.031; RFS HR 0.230, P=.038) and significant benefit in T3 patients (RFS HR 0.326, P=.031). No survival differences were observed between oxaliplatin-containing vs. non-oxaliplatin regimens (5-year RFS P=.636; OS P=.757). PSM analysis (n=56 pairs) confirmed the survival benefit (matched OS HR 0.344, P=.036). Conclusions: Adjuvant CTx significantly improves RFS and OS in high-risk stage II MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer, particularly in pT4 and PNI patients. The absence of regimen-specific survival differences suggests that treatment administration itself, rather than specific agents, determines outcomes. These findings provide evidence to bridge NCCN and ESMO guideline discrepancies, supporting risk-stratified adjuvant CTx in this population. Multivariate analysis for survival. Relapse free survival Hazard Ratio 95% CI P value Adjuvant chemotherapy No 1 0.117-0.660 0.003 Yes 0.278 Pathologic T stage T3 1 0.955-5.577 0.063 T4 2.308 Perineural invasion No 1 1.627-10.100 0.002 Yes 4.053 Overall survival Hazard Ratio 95% CI P value Adjuvant chemotherapy No 1 0.052-0.594 0.005 Yes 0.176 Age < 60 1 0.607-13.000 0.186 ≥ 60 2.810 Pathologic T stage

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.3622
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer with microsatellite instability-high or DNA mismatch repair deficiencies: A multicenter pooled analysis (KCSG-CO24-03).

Joon Young Hur, So Yeon Jeon, Seok Yun Kang, Jaemin Jo et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer with microsatellite instability-high or DNA mismatch repair deficiencies: A multicenter pooled analysis (KCSG-CO24-03).

Joon Young Hur, So Yeon Jeon, Seok Yun Kang, Jaemin Jo, Hyun Jin Bang, Jong Gwang Kim, Soon Il Lee, Yongho Noh, Hana Kim, Jina Yun, Se Jun Park, Hyeyeong Kim, Cheol-Sik Kim, Seung-Hoon Beom
article en

Abstract

3622 Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) for high-risk stage II MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer remains controversial, with discordant international guidelines. This study evaluated clinical outcomes comparing adjuvant CTx vs. observation in this population. Methods: This multicenter retrospective analysis included 192 patients with high-risk stage II MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer who underwent curative resection (2010-2020). High-risk features included pT4, grade 3-4, lymphovascular invasion, bowel obstruction/perforation, perineural invasion (PNI), inadequate lymph node sampling (<12), or close margins. Primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included 5-year overall survival (OS). A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed. Results: Of 192 patients, 128 (66.6%) received adjuvant CTx (FOLFOX n=66, capecitabine n=40, FL n=17, others n=5) and 64 (33.3%) underwent observation. Median follow-up was 60.5 months. During follow-up, 24 RFS events and 15 OS events occurred. The 5-year RFS was significantly higher with adjuvant CTx versus observation (94.0% vs. 83.7%; P=.001), as was 5-year OS (98.3% vs. 89.0%; P=.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant CTx as an independent prognostic factor for both RFS (HR 0.278, 95%CI 0.117-0.660; P=.003) and OS (HR 0.176, 95%CI 0.052-0.594; P=.005). PNI independently predicted worse RFS (HR 4.053; P=.002) and OS (HR 7.490; P=.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated pronounced benefit in pT4 patients (OS HR 0.094, P=.031; RFS HR 0.230, P=.038) and significant benefit in T3 patients (RFS HR 0.326, P=.031). No survival differences were observed between oxaliplatin-containing vs. non-oxaliplatin regimens (5-year RFS P=.636; OS P=.757). PSM analysis (n=56 pairs) confirmed the survival benefit (matched OS HR 0.344, P=.036). Conclusions: Adjuvant CTx significantly improves RFS and OS in high-risk stage II MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer, particularly in pT4 and PNI patients. The absence of regimen-specific survival differences suggests that treatment administration itself, rather than specific agents, determines outcomes. These findings provide evidence to bridge NCCN and ESMO guideline discrepancies, supporting risk-stratified adjuvant CTx in this population. Multivariate analysis for survival. Relapse free survival Hazard Ratio 95% CI P value Adjuvant chemotherapy No 1 0.117-0.660 0.003 Yes 0.278 Pathologic T stage T3 1 0.955-5.577 0.063 T4 2.308 Perineural invasion No 1 1.627-10.100 0.002 Yes 4.053 Overall survival Hazard Ratio 95% CI P value Adjuvant chemotherapy No 1 0.052-0.594 0.005 Yes 0.176 Age < 60 1 0.607-13.000 0.186 ≥ 60 2.810 Pathologic T stage

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Ulsan College (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Soonchunhyang University (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Kyungpook National University Medical Center (KR), Ajou University Hospital (KR), National Cancer Center (KR), Ulsan University Hospital (KR), Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (KR), Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (KR), Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Jeju National University Hospital (KR), Dankook University Hospital (KR), Bucheon University (KR), Jeonbuk National University (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.